Open descending and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement: operative steps for patients with prior endovascular treatment.

Open surgery remains the gold standard for the treatment of the thoracoabdominal aorta. The rising number of endovascularly treated patients comes with an increase in the number of patients who require secondary open interventions due to the complex nature of the aortic disease or to treat endovascular complications. We describe our current approach to secondary open extent II thoracoabdominal aortic repair in patients with prior endovascular repair. In this case report, we show two different cases that exemplify this scenario.

Resternotomy aortic root and arch replacement following previous complex type A aortic dissection requiring endovascular repair for malperfusion.

A redo sternotomy, aortic root, and arch replacement in a patient following previous complex surgical and endovascular type A aortic dissection repair is presented in this video case report. Shortly after having the initial type A aortic dissection repair with replacement of the ascending aorta, the patient developed severe visceral malperfusion due to a compressed distal true lumen and underwent emergency endovascular repair with ascending arch and descending thoracic aorta stents and chimney grafts for the aortic arch vessels as well as fenestration of the intimal flap of the abdominal aorta. Unfortunately, the patient developed permanent paraplegia and progressive symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation. The patient underwent a redo sternotomy, aortic root, and arch replacement with explantation of the ascending stent graft and chimney stent grafts. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was maintained throughout the procedure. The aortic arch was replaced using a Terumo Aortic Plexus multibranched graft distally anastomosed to the endovascular stent graft, and the innominate and left common carotid arteries were reimplanted onto the graft. The aortic root was replaced with a Bioconduit graft, using a modified Cabrol technique to reimplant the left coronary artery. A satisfactory postoperative course and computed tomography imaging highlight the feasibility of this highly complex aortic arch repair with careful preoperative planning.

A multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients on the elective waiting list for cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: During the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, elective cardiac surgery was suspended to provide ICU beds for COVID-19 patients and those requiring urgent cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the pandemic on outcomes of patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A multi-centre prospective cohort study. SETTING: The elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. PARTICIPANTS: Patients on the elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was surgery, percutaneous therapy or death at one year. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on patients on the elective adult cardiac surgery waiting list as of 1 March 2020 across seven UK cardiac surgical centres. Primary outcome was surgery, percutaneous therapy or death at one year. Demographic data and outcomes were obtained from local electronic records, anonymised and submitted securely to the lead centre for analysis. RESULTS: On 1 March 2020, there were 1099 patients on the elective waiting list for cardiac surgery. On 1 March 2021, 83% (n = 916) had met a primary outcome. Of these, 840 (92%) had surgery after a median of 195 (118-262) days on waiting list, 34 (3%) declined an offer of surgery, 23 (3%) had percutaneous intervention, 12 (1%) died, 7 (0.6%) were removed from the waiting list. The remainder of patients, 183 (17%) remained on the elective waiting list. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown, for the first time, significant delays to treatment of patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery. Although there was a low risk of mortality or urgent intervention, important unmeasured adverse outcomes such as quality of life or increased perioperative risk may be associated with prolonged waiting times.

Early experience of aortic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: A significant restructuring of the healthcare services has taken place since the declaration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with elective surgery put on hold to concentrate intensive care resources to treat COVID-19 as well as to protect patients who are waiting for relatively low risk surgery from exposure to potentially infected hospital environment. METHODS: Multicentre study, with 19 participating centers, to define the impact of the pandemic on the provision of aortovascular services and patients' outcomes after having adapted the thresholds for intervention to guarantee access to treatment for emergency and urgent conditions. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, including all patients with aortovascular conditions admitted for surgical or conservative treatment from the 1st March to the 20th May 2020. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were analyzed, and 182 underwent surgery. Diagnosis included: aneurysm (45%), acute aortic syndrome (44%), pseudoaneurysm (4%), aortic valve endocarditis (4%), and other (3%). Timing for surgery was: emergency (40%), urgent (34%), or elective (26%). In-hospital mortality was 12%. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the peri-operative period, and this subgroup was not associated with a higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant change in service provision for aortovascular patients in the UK. Although the emergency and urgent surgical activity were maintained, elective treatment was minimal during early months of the pandemic. The preoperative COVID-19 screening protocol, combined with self-isolation and shielding, contributed to the low incidence of COVID-19 in our series and a mortality similar to that of pre-pandemic outcomes.