Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
1.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 2024 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intensive lifestyle interventions including modest reductions in daily caloric intake (i.e., continuous calorie energy reduction (CER)), are recommended by U.S. national professional health organizations (e.g. American Heart Association). However, they are less effective in Black communities. A burgeoning literature has reported the promise of intermittent fasting (IF) as an alternative strategy for weight loss. However, IF studies have been conducted with predominately White participants and provided participants resources not readily available in real-world situations. OBJECTIVE: Weight loss and weight-related outcomes of a scalable (able to be widely disseminated and implemented) IF intervention developed with and for Black adults were compared to a CER intervention for the purpose of determining IF's feasibility (initial effectiveness, adherence, acceptance) in a Black community. DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled pilot study was conducted. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A total of 42 Black adults with a BMI≥25 were recruited from five Black churches (3 IF churches, 2 CER churches) in Western New York State from September 2021 until May 2022. Participants were free of medical conditions that might have contraindicated participation in a weight reduction program and other factors that might affect weight loss. INTERVENTIONS: Community health workers delivered the 6-month, 16-session faith-based IF and CER interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was feasibility, consisting of initial effectiveness on body weight (percent body weight lost from baseline to 6-month follow-up), adherence, and acceptability. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models accounting for within-church clustering were used. A baseline covariate corresponding to the outcome variable was included in the model. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: There was statistically significant weight loss within both arms [IF: -3.5 (-6, -0.9)]; [CER: -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8) kg], from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Compared to CER, IF led to significantly lower daily energy intake [414.2 (55.2, 773.2) kcal] and fat intake [16.1 (2.4, 29.8) g]. IF may result in lower fruit and vegetable intake [-103.2 (-200.9, -5.5) g] and fiber intake -5.4 (-8.7, -2) compared to CER. Participants in the IF arm completed 3.8 (1.4) more self-monitoring booklets compared to those in the CER arm (p=0.02). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: An IF intervention developed with and for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches. Larger studies need to be conducted to ascertain the extent IF can serve as a viable weight loss alternative to CER interventions in Black communities.

2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(2)2024 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As one of the 10 most common cancers in the United States, bladder cancer is the most expensive cancer to treat. Most bladder cancers (70%-80%) are diagnosed at early stages as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which can be removed. However, 50% to 80% of NMIBC recurs within 5 years, and 15% to 30% progresses with poor survival. Besides life-long surveillance, current treatment is limited. Preclinical and epidemiologic evidence suggest that dietary isothiocyanates (ITCs) in cruciferous vegetables (Cruciferae) could be a noninvasive and cost-effective strategy to improve NMIBC prognosis. Yet, a Cruciferae intervention that increases ITC exposure in NMIBC survivors has not been tested. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to test the effect of a Cruciferae intervention on urinary ITC levels and Cruciferae intake in NMIBC survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a 2-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a Cruciferae intervention against a general fruit and vegetable intervention (control) for NMIBC survivors. Both 6-month interventions consisted of mailed educational materials, a live call with staff to review the materials, and 11 interactive voice response calls. We anticipated that our Cruciferae intervention (Power to Redefine Your Health [POW-R Health]) would increase Cruciferae intake to 1 cup/day (secondary outcome), thus raising urinary ITC levels to 10 µM (primary outcome) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We randomized 49 patients with NMIBC diagnosed in 2018 through 2019, and retained 42 patients at 6-month follow-up. The treatment group reported 0.94 cups (95% CI, 0.24-1.65; P=.010) higher Cruciferae intake (treatment, 1.37 ± 1.19 cups vs control, 0.56 ± 0.72 cups) and increased urinary ITC levels by 11.1 µmol/g creatinine (treatment, 26.2 ± 20.9 vs control, 7.8 ± 11.5; P=.027) at 6-month follow-up compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our dietary intervention is the first to significantly increase Cruciferae intake and urinary ITC levels in NMIBC survivors, demonstrating an increase in ITC to levels that significantly decrease risk of disease-specific survival. A future randomized controlled trial testing POW-R Health on bladder cancer recurrence and progression is warranted. If proven to improve bladder cancer outcomes, our intervention has the potential to be a noninvasive, cost-effective, easily accessible way for NBMIC survivors to improve their bladder cancer prognosis.


Subject(s)
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Survivors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Racism is a social determinant of health inequities and associated with poorer health and health behaviors. As a domain of racism, self-reported racial discrimination affects health through unhealthy behaviors (e.g., smoking) but the understudied impact of self-reported racial discrimination's relationship with healthy behaviors (e.g., cancer screening) precludes a comprehensive understanding of racism's impact on health inequities. Understanding how self-reported racial discrimination impacts healthy behaviors is even more important for those living in rural persistent poverty areas (poverty rates of 20% or more of a population since 1980), who have a higher disease burden due to poverty's interaction with racism. The distinct sociocultural context of rural persistent poverty areas may result in differential responses to self-reported racial discrimination compared to those in non-persistent poverty areas. METHODS: A community-engaged process was used to administer a survey to a convenience sample of 251 Black adults residing in 11 rural persistent poverty counties in the state of Arkansas. Self-reported racial discrimination, fruit and vegetable intake, colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, and screening mammography were assessed. Stress and religion/spirituality were also assessed as potential mediators or moderators in the relationship between self-reported racial discrimination and healthy behaviors. RESULTS: In adjusted models, those reporting more self-reported racial discrimination had a higher probability of having had a test to check for cervical cancer (situation discrimination: OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.5; frequency discrimination: OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12). Stress and religion/spirituality were not significant mediators/moderators. DISCUSSION: Greater self-reported racial discrimination was associated with a higher odds of cervical cancer screening. Black adults residing in rural persistent poverty areas may have greater self-reported racial discrimination-specific coping and racial identity attitudes.

4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(12): 1145-1155, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526781

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers, facilitators, and priority needs related to cancer prevention, control, and research in persistent poverty areas. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups with 17 providers and staff of primary care clinics serving persistent poverty areas throughout the state of Arkansas. RESULTS: We identified multiple barriers, facilitators, and priority needs related to cancer prevention and control at primary care clinics serving persistent poverty areas. Barriers included transportation, medical costs, limited providers and service availability, and patient fear/discomfort with cancer topics. Facilitators identified were cancer navigators and community health events/services, and priority needs included patient education, comprehensive workflows, improved communication, and integration of cancer navigators into healthcare teams. Barriers to cancer-related research were lack of provider/staff time, patient uncertainty/skepticism, patient health literacy, and provider skepticism/concerns regarding patient burden. Research facilitators included better informing providers/staff about research studies and leveraging navigators as a bridge between clinic and patients. CONCLUSION: Our results inform opportunities to adapt and implement evidence-based interventions to improve cancer prevention, control, and research in persistent poverty areas. To improve cancer prevention and control, we recommend locally-informed strategies to mitigate patient barriers, improved patient education efforts, standardized patient navigation workflows, improved integration of cancer navigators into care teams, and leveraging community health events. Dedicated staff time for research, coordination of research and clinical activities, and educating providers/staff about research studies could improve cancer-related research activities in persistent poverty areas.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Poverty Areas , Humans , Delivery of Health Care , Focus Groups , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Communication , Qualitative Research
5.
Inquiry ; 60: 469580231152051, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36799349

ABSTRACT

This study compared the effectiveness of two Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) interventions on weight loss among overweight and obese Marshallese adults. The study was a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in 30 churches in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Marshallese adults with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were eligible for the study. The study sample included 380 participants. Participants received either a faith-based adaptation of the DPP or a family-focused adaptation of the DPP, each delivered over 24 weeks. The primary outcome was weight change from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes in Hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, dietary intake, family support for healthy behaviors, and physical activity. Outcomes were examined longitudinally using general linear mixed effects regression models, adjusting for baseline outcomes, sociodemographic covariates, and clustering of participants within churches. Reductions in weight were small for both groups. Overall, only 7.1% of all participants lost 5% or more of their baseline body weight. There were no significant differences in weight loss between the 2 arms at 6 months (P = .3599) or at 12 months (P = .3207). Significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found between the 2 arms at 6 months (P = .0293; P = .0068, respectively). Significant within-arm changes were found for sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and family support for both arms at both follow-ups. Both interventions achieved a modest weight loss. While even modest weight loss can be clinically significant, future research is needed to identify chronic disease prevention interventions that can successfully reduce weight for this at-risk population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Overweight , Adult , Humans , Overweight/prevention & control , Overweight/complications , Obesity/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Weight Loss/physiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
6.
Nutrients ; 15(2)2023 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36678146

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer (PanCa) is a highly fatal malignancy with few modifiable risk and prognostic factors. This study investigates the association between cola, diet cola, and non-cola soft drink consumption and PanCa risk and mortality. A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Patient Epidemiology Data System (1982-1998) at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Buffalo, NY, USA), including 213 PanCa patients and 852 cancer-free controls. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, including a 46-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of cola, diet cola, and non-cola soft drink consumption and PanCa risk. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs of cola, diet cola, and non-cola soft drink consumption and PanCa mortality. Stratified analyses were conducted by sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. We observed significant 55% increased odds of PanCa among patients consuming ≥1 regular cola per day (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.01-2.39). We also observed non-significant 38% increased hazard of mortality among patients consuming ≥1 regular cola per day (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.91-2.07). We conclude that regular cola consumption is a modifiable lifestyle that may be associated with PanCa risk and mortality following diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Sugars , Humans , Artificially Sweetened Beverages , Sweetening Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Prospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Beverages/adverse effects , Beverages/analysis , Pancreatic Neoplasms
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 33(8): 1095-1105, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35773504

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Prior cancer research is limited by inconsistencies in defining rurality. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of cancer risk factors and cancer screening behaviors across various county-based rural classification codes, including measures reflecting a continuum, to inform our understanding of cancer disparities according to the extent of rurality. METHODS: Using an ecological cross-sectional design, we examined differences in cancer risk factors and cancer screening behaviors from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey (2008-2013) across rural counties and between rural and urban counties using four rural-urban classification codes for counties and county-equivalents in 2013: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, National Center for Health Statistics, USDA Economic Research Service's rural-urban continuum codes, and Urban Influence Codes. RESULTS: Although a rural-to-urban gradient was not consistently evident across all classification codes, the prevalence of smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, and binge alcohol use increased (all ptrend < 0.03), while colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening decreased (all ptrend < 0.001) with increasing rurality. Differences in the prevalence of risk factors and screening behaviors across rural areas were greater than differences between rural and urban counties for obesity (2.4% vs. 1.5%), physical activity (2.9% vs. 2.5%), binge alcohol use (3.4% vs. 0.4%), cervical cancer screening (6.8% vs. 4.0%), and colorectal cancer screening (4.4% vs. 3.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Rural cancer disparities persist across multiple rural-urban classification codes, with marked variation in cancer risk factors and screening evident within rural regions. Focusing only on a rural-urban dichotomy may not sufficiently capture subpopulations of rural residents at greater risk for cancer and cancer-related mortality.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Obesity , Risk Factors , Rural Population , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population
8.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 15(6): 377-390, 2022 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271710

ABSTRACT

We conducted a scoping review of sweet beverages (SB) and cancer outcomes to ascertain SB's relationship with cancer by SB type and cancer type. We used the PRISMA Scoping Review Guidelines to review quantitative studies of SB and cancer. Eligible studies included articles reporting a quantitative association between SB intake and a cancer-related health outcome in humans, including adiposity-related versus non-adiposity-related cancers. Studies included analyses not confounded by artificial sweeteners. SB was defined as beverages with added sugars, 100% fruit juices, or fruit drinks that were not 100% fruit juice. We used a data-charting form to extract study characteristics and results.A total of 38 were included. The sample consisted predominately of adults from European countries outside of the United States or predominately White samples in the United States. Across all conceptualizations of SB, a greater proportion of studies examining carbonated drinks reported SB's relationship with poorer cancer outcomes, which was exacerbated in adiposity-related cancers.The composition of different types of SB (e.g., high fructose corn syrup, natural fructose) as they relate to cancer is important. Studies including more diverse populations that bear a disproportionate burden of both SB intake and cancer are needed. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Different sugars in SB may impact cancer differently. Compared with SB made with other types of sugar, drinks made with man-made fructose (carbonated drinks) had poorer cancer outcomes, especially in cancers impacted by obesity. Understanding how different SB affect cancer would help us target which SB to avoid.


Subject(s)
High Fructose Corn Syrup , Neoplasms , Adult , Beverages/adverse effects , Fructose , High Fructose Corn Syrup/analysis , Humans , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/etiology , Obesity/complications , Sweetening Agents/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Hum Lact ; 38(4): 732-739, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pacific Islanders in the United States have lower initiation rates and shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding compared to other racial/ethnic groups. RESEARCH AIM: To describe infant feeding beliefs and experiences of Marshallese living in the United States. METHODS: We used a prospective and cross-sectional exploratory, descriptive qualitative design with Marshallese participants (N = 36) residing in the United States between July 2019 and July 2020. Data were collected at 6-8 weeks postpartum. Our qualitative analytic approach integrated inductive and deductive techniques. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 27.1 years (SD = 6.1), and 88.9% (n = 32) were born in the Marshall Islands. A majority of participants were single, widowed, or in an unmarried partnership (n = 28, 77.8%). Most participants had a high school education or lower (n = 30, 83.3%). Mean household size was 7.2 (SD = 2.8). Fewer than half of participants had no health insurance (n = 14, 38.9%), and almost all participants (91.7%) did not work at the time of data collection. Two themes emerged: 1) infant feeding initiation and practices; and 2) concerns over breastfeeding in public. The majority of participants' infants received both human milk and formula. Participants described beliefs that breastfeeding in public was against American customs, which influenced their decision about breastfeeding in public. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was the first to document infant feeding beliefs and experiences of Marshallese living in the United States at 6-8 weeks postpartum. Findings will inform future health education programs.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Transients and Migrants , Infant , Female , Humans , United States , Adult , Ethnicity , Respect , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies
10.
JMIR Cancer ; 8(1): e32291, 2022 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is one of the top 10 most common cancers in the United States. Most bladder cancers (70%-80%) are diagnosed at early stages as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which can be removed surgically. However, 50% to 80% of NMIBC cases recur within 5 years, and 15% to 30% progress with poor survival. Current treatments are limited and expensive. A wealth of preclinical and epidemiological evidence suggests that dietary isothiocyanates in cruciferous vegetables (Cruciferae) could be a novel, noninvasive, and cost-effective strategy to control NMIBC recurrence and progression. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop a scalable dietary intervention that increases isothiocyanate exposure through Cruciferae intake in NMIBC survivors. METHODS: We worked with a community advisory board (N=8) to identify relevant factors, evidence-based behavior change techniques, and behavioral theory constructs used to increase Cruciferae intake in NMIBC survivors; use the PEN-3 Model focused on incorporating cultural factors salient to the group's shared experiences to review the intervention components (eg, the saliency of behavioral messages); administer the revised intervention to community partners for their feedback; and refine the intervention. RESULTS: We developed a multicomponent intervention for NMIBC survivors consisting of a magazine, tracking book, live telephone call script, and interactive voice messages. Entitled POW-R Health: Power to Redefine Your Health, the intervention incorporated findings from our adaptation process to ensure saliency to NMIBC survivors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence-based, theoretically grounded dietary intervention developed to reduce bladder cancer recurrence in NMIBC survivors using a systematic process for community adaptation. This study provides a model for others who aim to develop behavioral, community-relevant interventions for cancer prevention and control with the overall goal of wide-scale implementation and dissemination.

11.
Health Promot Perspect ; 11(2): 179-185, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34195041

ABSTRACT

Background: Public health officials anticipate severe health outcomes amidst the circulation of two major viruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza. This study investigated intent to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and influenza, and sought to identify attitudes towards vaccines and barriers for vaccine acceptance. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Louisiana State University Medicine Clinic from September 2020 to December 2020. Intent to be vaccinated against the COVID-19 and influenza virus was assessed through a brief questionnaire. Additionally, hesitancy and attitudes regarding vaccines were ascertained using validated 5-point Likert scales. In total, 280 patients completed the questionnaire. Results: A total of 248 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall 167 (67%, 95% CI = 61.1-73.0%) of patients were unsure or did not intend to be vaccinated against COVID-19, while only 19.3% (95% CI = 14.4-24.5%) were unsure or did not intend to be vaccinated against the influenza vaccine. Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy included concern regarding side effects, fear of getting sick from the vaccine, and the absence of vaccine recommendations from their doctor. Concerningly, African American patients demonstrated decreased likelihood of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusion: This survey revealed that only 1 in 3 adults intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19, while 8 out of 10 adults intended to receive the influenza vaccine. Patients who intended on getting the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to be African American. Given the degree of hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccination, a multifaceted approach to facilitate vaccine uptake that includes vaccine education, behavioral change strategies, and health promotion, is paramount.

12.
J Cancer Educ ; 36(6): 1277-1284, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441002

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a critical modifiable risk factor in cancer prevention, control, and survivorship. Comprehensive weight loss interventions (e.g., Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)) have been recommended by governmental agencies to treat obesity. However, their high implementation costs limit their reach, especially in underserved African American (AA) communities. Community health workers (CHWs) or trusted community members can help increase access to obesity interventions in underserved regions facing provider shortages. CHW-led interventions have increased weight loss. However, in-person CHW training can be costly to deliver and often requires extensive travel to implement. Web-based trainings have become common to increase reach at reduced cost. However, the feasibility of an online CHW training to deliver the DPP in AAs is unknown. The feasibility of an online CHW training to deliver the DPP adapted for AAs was assessed. The online training was compared to an in-person DPP training with established effectiveness. CHW effectiveness and satisfaction were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Nineteen participants (in-person n = 10; online n = 9) were recruited. At post-training, all scored higher than the 80% on a knowledge test required to deliver the intervention. All participants reported high levels of training satisfaction (88.9% of online participants and 90% of in-person participants rated the training as at least 6 on a 1-7 scale) and comfort to complete intervention tasks (78% of online participants and 60% of in-person participants scored at least 6 on a 1-7 scale). There were no significant differences in outcomes by arm. An online CHW training to deliver the DPP adapted for AAs faith communities produced comparable effectiveness and satisfaction to an evidence-based in-person CHW training. Further research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of different CHW training modalities to reduce obesity.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Community Health Workers , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Rural Population , Weight Loss
13.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 8(2): 375-383, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529423

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined barriers to accessing medical care for migrant US-residing Marshallese Islanders. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to identify potential inequities. Surveys from largely migrant diabetic Marshallese Islanders (n = 255) were compared with nationally representative data. Two major outcomes were assessed including 1-whether or not one reported having forgone medical care in the past year because of cost-and 2-whether or not one reported not having a usual source of care. RESULTS: Overall, 74% and 77% of Marshallese Islanders reported forgone care and no usual source of care, respectively, versus 15% and 7% of the US diabetic population. In multivariable analyses, being younger; uninsured; unemployed; male; of lower education; Native American or Hispanic (versus White); and residing in the South were associated with forgone care nationwide, whereas only lacking insurance was associated with forgone care among Marshallese Islanders. Nationwide being younger; uninsured; unmarried; female; of lower education; Native American or Hispanic (versus White); and residing in the South were associated with not having a usual source of care, whereas only being younger and uninsured were associated with not having a usual source of care among Marshallese Islanders. CONCLUSION: The largest group of diabetic Marshallese Islanders in the continental US faces severe healthcare access inequities necessitating policies that increase access to health insurance options and associated resources.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Female , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
14.
Ethn Health ; 26(8): 1196-1208, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288554

ABSTRACT

Objective: Examine cross-sectional associations between body mass index (BMI) and related health behaviors, barriers and facilitators to health care, and perceived health status among a sample of U.S. Marshallese adults with Type 2 diabetes and evaluate associations of interest between participants and their family members.Design: Cross-sectional baseline data were analyzed from participants in a diabetes self-management education intervention trial.Setting: Data collection took place in home or community settings through a community-academic partnership in Arkansas.Participants: Study participants consisted of U.S. Marshallese adults with Type 2 diabetes (N = 221) and their family members (N = 211) recruited through community settings.Intervention(s): N/A.Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants' height and weight were measured using standard protocols to calculate BMI (kg/m2). Diet, physical activity, health care access, financial strain related to health care, perceived health status, and health care satisfaction were measured using self-report surveys.Results: Participants' mean BMI was 31.0 (95% CI: 30.2-31.7), with over half of study participants and their family members' BMI falling in the obese category. Participants' BMI was positively associated with spreading health care bill payments over time (ß = 1.75 (SE = 0.87); p = 0.045). Positive associations between participants and their family members were observed for self-reported health status conditions, health care coverage, health care utilization, and health care satisfaction.Conclusion: Study findings highlight the high prevalence of obesity and related risk factors among U.S. Marshallese adults with Type 2 diabetes and emphasize the need for intervention strategies that build upon cultural strengths and target community, policy, systems, and environmental changes to address obesity and chronic disease in this marginalized community.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Risk Factors
15.
Prev Med Rep ; 18: 101084, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32309114

ABSTRACT

Black adults bear a disproportionate burden of the obesity epidemic but are underrepresented in weight loss research and lose less weight than their white counterparts in weight loss interventions. Comprehensive behavioral weight loss interventions cause weight loss, but their high cost have stymied their implementation in black and other underserved communities. Recent translations of evidence-based weight loss interventions for black communities have been designed to increase intervention reach. However, the costs of implementing such interventions have seldom been reported in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Thus, the costs of implementing a community-health worker delivered Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) adaptated for rural black adults of faith (The WORD) are reported. Data from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial conducted in 31 churches (n = 440) were used to calculate implementation costs. All participants received the 16-session core weight loss intervention and weight loss data was collected at baseline and 6 months. Participants lost an average of 2.53 kg at 6 months. Total implementation costs were $340.95 per participant. Thus, the implementation cost was $138 per kg. This is one of the few comprehensive examinations of costs for a DPP translation for black adults of faith and provide initial data from which practitioners and policy makers can use to determine the engagement of churches to disseminate the DPP through churches. Future studies are needed to confirm the extent churches are a cost-effective strategy to cause weight loss in black communities.

17.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 28(3): 510-520, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984668

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Rural black communities bear a disproportionate burden of obesity. To increase reach among underserved groups, community-based weight loss and maintenance interventions are crucial. METHODS: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was adapted for rural black adults of faith to create The Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance (WORD) trial, a group-based, community health worker-delivered weight loss intervention. A Weight Loss Only arm (16 sessions) was compared with a Weight Loss + Maintenance arm (16 + 12 sessions) in a cluster randomized controlled trial of 31 churches (n = 440). Weight and related behaviors were assessed at 0, 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: The WORD produced weight loss from baseline to 6 months (percentage body weight change -2.47 [-3.13 to -1.80]). Among those who lost 5% of their baseline weight, there was a statistical trend of lower weight regain in the Weight Loss + Maintenance arm compared with control. Maintenance arm participants reported higher activity at 12 months. There were no between-arm differences at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: The WORD produced weight loss from baseline to 6 months on par with that produced by other DPP adaptations for black communities, including adaptations using health professionals. Weight regain was also consistent with that reported in prior literature. Continuing sessions as part of the church's mission may foster adoption of DPP-based weight loss programs.


Subject(s)
Obesity/therapy , Weight Reduction Programs/methods , Black or African American , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/psychology , Religion , Rural Population
18.
Transl Behav Med ; 10(1): 195-203, 2020 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31294809

ABSTRACT

The emerging era of precision medicine (PM) holds great promise for patient care by considering individual, environmental, and lifestyle factors to optimize treatment. Context is centrally important to PM, yet, to date, little attention has been given to the unique context of religion and spirituality (R/S) and their applicability to PM. R/S can support and reinforce health beliefs and behaviors that affect health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to discuss how R/S can be considered in PM at multiple levels of context and recommend strategies for integrating R/S in PM. We conducted a descriptive, integrative literature review of R/S at the individual, institutional, and societal levels, with the aim of focusing on R/S factors with a high level of salience to PM. We discuss the utility of considering R/S in the suitability and uptake of PM prevention and treatment strategies by providing specific examples of how R/S influences health beliefs and practices at each level. We also propose future directions in research and practice to foster greater understanding and integration of R/S to enhance the acceptability and patient responsiveness of PM research approaches and clinical practices. Elucidating the context of R/S and its value to PM can advance efforts toward a more whole-person and patient-centered approach to improve individual and population health.


Subject(s)
Precision Medicine , Spirituality , Humans , Religion
19.
J Relig Health ; 59(2): 758-771, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29790080

ABSTRACT

Religion and body weight was explored at two time points among overweight and obese African-American adults. Baseline and follow-up data were collected from 26 adults participating in a weight loss intervention and analyzed using multiple regression analyses of religious measures, body weight, and other variables. Frequent church attendance was significantly associated with greater weight lost from baseline to 16-week follow-up. In this exploratory study, religious interactions and experiences may be involved in shaping body weight among African-Americans attempting to lose weight.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Obesity/psychology , Religion , Adult , Body Weight , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Weight Loss
20.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 30(4): 1302-1330, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31680100

ABSTRACT

This scoping review identifies the best practices of community-based participatory research with Pacific Islanders in the United States and United States Affiliated Pacific Islands. Eighty-four articles from January 2000 to December 2017 were included in the review. Best practices included the importance of engaging Pacific Islander community leaders as research staff, community co-investigators, and community advisory board members. Best practices also focused on removing barriers to research by using participants' native languages, conducting research within the geographic community, and spending significant time to build trust. Novel best practices included honoring Pacific Islanders' cultural practices such as protocols for engagement, reciprocity, and social and spiritual inclusiveness and honoring Pacific Islanders' collectivist cultural structure. The goal of this scoping review is to aid community-academic partnerships working to improve the health of Pacific Islanders.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Community-Based Participatory Research/standards , Humans , Micronesia , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...