Phase 3 study of recombinant von Willebrand factor in patients with severe von Willebrand disease who are undergoing elective surgery.

Essentials Recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) is effective in von Willebrand disease (VWD). A phase 3 study of rVWF, with/without recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) before surgery in VWD. Overall rVWF's efficacy was rated excellent/good; rVWF was administered alone in most patients. rVWF was well-tolerated and hemostasis was achieved in patients with severe VWD undergoing surgery. SUMMARY: Background Recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) has demonstrated efficacy for on-demand treatment of bleeding in severe von Willebrand disease (VWD), warranting evaluation in the surgical setting. Objectives This study (NCT02283268) evaluated the hemostatic efficacy/safety profile of rVWF, with/without recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), in patients with severe VWD undergoing surgery. Patients/Methods Patients received rVWF 40-60 IU kg-1 , VWF ristocetin cofactor activity was measured 12-24 h before surgery. If endogenous FVIII activity (FVIII:C) target levels were achieved 3 h before surgery, rVWF was administered alone 1 h before surgery; rVWF was co-administered with rFVIII if target endogenous FVIII levels were not achieved. rVWF was infused postoperatively to maintain target trough levels. Overall and intraoperative hemostatic efficacy, the pharmacodynamics of rVWF administration and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results All patients treated with rVWF for major (n = 10), minor (n = 4) and oral (n = 1) surgery had overall and intraoperative hemostatic efficacy ratings of excellent (73.3% and 86.7%) or good (26.7% and 13.3%). Most rVWF infusions (89.4%) were administered alone, resulting in hemostatically effective levels of endogenous FVIII within 6 h, which were sustained for 72-96 h; 70% (n = 7/10) of major surgeries were performed without rFVIII co-administration. Six patients reported 12 treatment-emergent AEs. Two patients each had one serious AE: diverticulitis (not treatment related) and deep vein thrombosis (sponsor-assessed as possibly treatment related). No severe allergic reactions or inhibitory antibodies were reported. Conclusions These data support the efficacy and safety profile of rVWF in patients with severe VWD undergoing elective surgery.

The natural history of occult or angiodysplastic gastrointestinal bleeding in von Willebrand disease.

Recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the most challenging complications encountered in the management of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). The commonest cause is angiodysplasia, but often no cause is identified due to the difficulty in making the diagnosis. The optimal treatment to prevent recurrences remains unknown. We performed a retrospective study of VWD patients with occult or angiodysplastic bleeding within the setting of the von Willebrand Disease Prophylaxis Network (VWD PN) to describe diagnostic and treatment strategies. Centres participating in the VWD PN recruited subjects under their care with a history of congenital VWD and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to angiodysplasia, or cases in which the cause was not identified despite investigation. Patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome or those for whom the GI bleeding was due to another cause were excluded. Forty-eight patients from 18 centres in 10 countries were recruited. Seven individuals had a family history of GI bleeding and all VWD types except 2N were represented. Angiodysplasia was confirmed in 38%, with video capsule endoscopy and GI tract endoscopies being the most common methods of making the diagnosis. Recurrent GI bleeding in VWD is associated with significant morbidity and required hospital admission on up to 30 occasions. Patients were treated with multiple pharmacological agents with prophylactic von Willebrand factor concentrate being the most efficient in preventing recurrence of the GI bleeding. The diagnosis and treatment of recurrent GI bleeding in congenital VWD remains challenging and is associated with significant morbidity. Prophylactic treatment with von Willebrand factor concentrate was the most effective method of preventing recurrent bleeding but its efficacy remains to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Guidance on the dental management of patients with haemophilia and congenital bleeding disorders.

Recommendations for dental preventive strategies and treatment planning were originally developed through consensus meetings by the Scottish Oral Health Group for Medically Compromised Patients and published in 2003 as a Guideline. The United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) Dental Working Party has updated these recommendations following the AGREE II approach (www.agreetrust.org), involving a literature search, a review of national and international guidelines and after seeking the opinions of haemophilia treaters in the United Kingdom by an online survey. Where possible, evidence from the literature is graded according to the 'GRADE' system (www.bcshguidelines.com/bsch_process/evidence_levels_and_grades_of_recommendations/43_grade.html); however, overall there is a lack of robust data and most studies have methodological limitations. The objective of this guidance, which is largely consensus-based, is to assist dental practitioners in primary and secondary care to provide routine dental care for patients of all ages with congenital bleeding diatheses in order to improve overall access to dental care. The guidance may not be appropriate in all cases and individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach. Date for guideline review: May 2016.

SURgical interventions with FEIBA (SURF): international registry of surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitory antibodies.

Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) can effectively achieve haemostasis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Further evaluation of FEIBA in surgical settings is of significant interest considering the relatively limited prospective data published to date. The aim of the study is to evaluate the perioperative efficacy and safety of FEIBA in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Haemophilia patients with inhibitors who underwent surgical procedures and received FEIBA for perioperative haemostatic control were prospectively enrolled in an open-label, noninterventional, postauthorization study [SURgical interventions with FEIBA (SURF)]. Outcome measures included haemostatic efficacy, safety, FEIBA exposure and blood loss associated with the perioperative use of FEIBA. Thirty-five surgical procedures were performed at 19 centres worldwide in patients with congenital haemophilia A, congenital haemophilia B, or acquired haemophilia A. Haemorrhagic risk was severe in 37.1% (13 of 35) of the procedures, moderate in 25.7% (9 of 35) and mild in 37.1% (13 of 35). One moderate risk surgery was excluded from the efficacy analyses because it did not meet all protocol requirements. Haemostasis was judged to be 'good' or 'excellent' in 91.2% (31 of 34) of surgical procedures and 'fair' in 8.8% (3 of 34). Among the 12 adverse events, three were serious adverse events (SAEs), two of which were unrelated to FEIBA therapy; one SAE, a clot in an arteriovenous fistula, was deemed to be possibly related to therapy. This prospective investigation confirms that FEIBA can be safely and effectively used when performing surgical procedures in haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Consensus recommendations for the use of FEIBA(®) in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors undergoing elective orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgery.

A growing number of publications have described the efficacy and safety of FEIBA as a first-line haemostatic agent for surgical procedures in haemophilia A patients with high-responding FVIII inhibitors. The aim of this study was to provide practical guidance on patient management and selection and also to communicate a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA during and after surgery. A consensus group was convened with the aims of (i) providing an overview of the efficacy and safety of FEIBA in surgery; (ii) sharing best practice; (iii) developing recommendations based on the outcome of (i) and (ii). To date there have been 17 publications reporting on the use of FEIBA in over 210 major and minor orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgical procedures. Haemostatic outcome was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 78-100% of major cases. The reporting of thromboembolic complications or anamnestic response to FEIBA was very rare. Key to the success of FEIBA as haemostatic cover in surgery is to utilize the preplanning phase to prepare the patient both for surgery and also for rehabilitation. Haemostatic control with FEIBA should be continued for an adequate period postoperatively to support wound healing and to cover what can in some patients be an extended period of physiotherapy. Published data have demonstrated that FEIBA can provide adequate, well tolerated, peri and postoperative haemostatic cover for a variety of major and minor surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia A. The consensus recommendations provide a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA.

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study of the recombinant factor VIIa variant BAY 86-6150 in hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: BAY 86-6150 is a new human recombinant factor VIIa variant developed for high procoagulant activity and longer action in people with hemophilia with inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAY 86-6150 in non-bleeding hemophilia subjects. METHODS: The study included non-bleeding men (18-65 years of age) with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Sixteen subjects were randomized 3 : 1 to four cohorts of escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50 or 90 µg kg(-1) [n = 3 per cohort]) or placebo (n = 1 per cohort); an independent data-monitoring committee reviewed previous cohort data before the next dose escalation. Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose; subjects were monitored for 50 days postdose. RESULTS: At the tested doses, BAY 86-6150 was not associated with clinically significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. BAY 86-6150 pharmacokinetics exhibited a linear dose response, with a half-life of 5-7 h. Subjects demonstrated consistent, dose-dependent thrombin generation ex vivo in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (mean peak effect, 26-237 nm thrombin from 6.5 to 90 µg kg(-1)). Peak thrombin levels over time paralleled BAY 86-6150, with thrombin kinetics appearing to be slightly shorter; thus, circulating BAY 86-6150 retained activity. There were corresponding decreases in activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times. No subject developed de novo anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies during the 50-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study, BAY 86-6150 was tolerated at the highest dose (90 µg kg(-1)), with no safety concerns. Safety and efficacy will be further evaluated in phase II/III studies.

Factor IX replacement to cover total knee replacement surgery in haemophilia B: a single-centre experience, 2000-2010.

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a well recognized treatment for haemophilic arthropathy. Successful haemostasis can be achieved by bolus doses or continuous infusion (CI) using either recombinant (r) or plasma-derived (pd) factor IX (FIX). We retrospectively analysed our experience of factor replacement to cover TKR in haemophilia B patients and explored factors related to FIX use during surgery. Between 2000 and 2010, 13 primary TKRs were performed in 11 haemophilia B patients. Operations were performed by the same surgeon using standard techniques. Median age was 58 years (42-79). An adjusted CI protocol was used for 5 days followed by bolus doses. FIX:C was maintained at 100 IU dL(-1) in the immediate postoperative period. There was no excess haemorrhage. There was no evidence of thrombosis or infection. All patients received mechanical thromboprophylaxis and only one chemical. CI was used in seven cases. Ten patients received pdFIX. Median hospital stay was 14 days (8-17). Median factor usage was 999 IU kg(-1) (768-1248). During CI, factor consumption was 695 IU kg(-1), 691 IU kg(-1) and 495 IU kg(-1) for BeneFix®, Replenine® and Haemonine, respectively. Clearance of both pdFIX and rFIX reduced during CI. All operations were uncomplicated. The decreased clearance in the CI setting reduced the amount of FIX required to maintain a therapeutic level. This reduction was greater with pdFIX and may be related to pharmacokinetic differences between pdFIX and rFIX. Given the excellent safety profile of the pdFIX products, CI of FIX and particularly pdFIX is safe, efficacious and convenient.

Management of muscle haematomas in patients with severe haemophilia in an evidence-poor world.

Treatment studies in haemophilia focus on joint bleeds; however, some 10-25% of bleeds occur in muscles. This review addresses management of muscle haematoma in severe haemophilia, defines gaps in the published evidence, and presents a combined clinician and physiotherapist perspective of treatment modalities. The following grade 2C recommendations were synthesized: (i) Sport and activity should be based on individual factor levels, bleeding history and physical characteristics, (ii) Musculoskeletal review aids the management of children and adults, (iii) 'Time to full recovery' should be realistic and based on known timelines from the healthy population, (iv) Diagnosis should be carried out by both a clinician and physiotherapist, (v) Severe muscle bleeds should be treated similarly to surgical patients: a 50% trough for 10-14 days followed by high-level prophylaxis, (vi) Protection, rest, ice, compression and elevation should be implemented in the acute stage, and (vii) Physiotherapy and rehabilitation should be divided into: control of haemorrhage (phase 1); restoration of Range of Movement (ROM) and strength (phase 2); functional rehabilitation and return to normal living (phase 3). Recommendations specifically for inhibitor patients include: (i) Minor to moderate bleeds should be managed by home-treatment within 1 h of bleed onset using either one injection of rFVIIa 270 µg kg(-1), or two to three injections of rFVIIa 90 µg kg(-1) (2-3 h intervals), or FEIBA 50-100 U kg(-1) (repeated at 12-hourly intervals, if necessary) and (ii) Severe muscle bleeds should be supervised by the treatment centre and include bypassing agents until clinical improvement is observed.

UKHCDO guidelines on the management of HCV in patients with hereditary bleeding disorders 2011.

Chronic HCV infection continues to be of significant clinical importance in patients with hereditary bleeding disorders. This guideline provides information on the recent advances in the investigation and treatment of HCV infection and gives GRADE system based recommendations on the management of the infection in this patient group.

Experience of four UK comprehensive care centres using FEIBA® for surgeries in patients with inhibitors.

Increasing evidence indicates that factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor bypassing agents (FEIBA® and NovoSeven®) can provide effective peri-operative haemostasis in haemophilia patients with high-responding inhibitors. We report the collected experience of all major and minor surgeries, conducted between December 1998 and September 2008, at four UK haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres with FEIBA® as the first-line bypassing agent in patients with inhibitors. A total of 26 surgical procedures were performed in 18 patients of ages 34-83 years including five patients with acquired FVIII inhibitors. A single pre-operative infusion of FEIBA was followed by 6-12 h interval dosing for major surgeries at the discretion of the physician to approximate a maximum of 200 U kg(-1) day(-1), with tapering when postoperative haemostasis and wound healing permitted. Haemostatic outcomes were retrospectively reviewed against European consensus thresholds for blood loss and duration of treatment compared with expectations for equivalent procedures in non-inhibitor patients. Peri-operative haemostatic outcome with FEIBA was rated excellent or good in 78% of 18 major surgeries in 12 patients, including 11 major orthopaedic procedures. Haemostatic outcome was rated excellent in all seven procedures in five patients with acquired FVIII inhibitors and in all eight minor surgical procedures in six patients. FEIBA was well tolerated with no intra-operative haemostatic complications. A single, transient postoperative thrombotic adverse event occurred in a patient with cerebrovascular disease. This case series adds significantly to existing evidence that FEIBA can provide adequate, well-tolerated, peri-operative haemostatic cover for a wide variety of major and minor surgical procedures.

FEIBA prophylaxis in haemophilia patients: a clinical update and treatment recommendations.

In patients with severe haemophilia and inhibitors, regular factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the frequency of bleeding by up to 85% and to improve patient quality of life. FEIBA is well tolerated; the incidence of thrombotic events and of allergic reactions is extremely low. The concept of prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors is relatively new and some clinicians may be unsure of how to use FEIBA in this context. These treatment recommendations, based on published evidence plus the collective experience of a group of haematologists (with practical knowledge of managing inhibitor patients with FEIBA prophylaxis), are intended to provide guidance to clinicians considering initiating and maintaining patients on FEIBA prophylaxis with specific focus on practical aspects of patient selection, dosing, monitoring and stop criteria.

Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in patients with inherited bleeding disorders: an international, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is a major co-morbidity in patients with hemophilia. However, there is little information on the efficacy of antiviral therapy and long-term follow-up after treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of interferon-based (IFN-based) therapy on hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication, to identify determinants associated with treatment response, and to assess the occurrence of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) after completing antiviral therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter cohort study, 295 treatment-naïve hemophilia patients chronically infected with HCV were included. The effect of therapy was expressed as sustained virological response (SVR). Determinants associated with treatment response were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Cumulative incidence of ESLD was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier survival table. RESULTS: Among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative patients (n = 235), SVR was 29% (29/101) for IFN monotherapy, 44% (32/72) for IFN with ribavirin, and 63% (39/62) for pegylated IFN (PegIFN) with ribavirin. In patients co-infected with HIV (n = 60), IFN monotherapy, IFN with ribavirin, and PegIFN with ribavirin eradicated HCV in 7/35 (20%), 1/2 (50%), and 11/23 (48%), respectively. SVR increased with genotype 2 and 3 [OR 11.0, 95% CI: 5.8-20.5], and combination therapy (IFN and ribavirin OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7-8.4), PegIFN and ribavirin (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.8-9.5). Up to 15 years after antiviral treatment, none of the patients with a SVR relapsed and none developed ESLD. In contrast, among unsuccessfully treated patients the cumulative incidence of ESLD after 15 years was 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Successful antiviral therapy appears to have a durable effect and reduces the risk of ESLD considerably.

Acquired haemophilia masked by warfarin therapy.

Acquired haemophilia is a rare phenomenon and prompt diagnosis is essential for successful treatment. Early laboratory detection could minimize its potentially devastating consequences and reduce mortality but when a masking element such as anticoagulant therapy is present, delay in diagnosis is not uncommon. A prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) may be falsely attributed to warfarin alone, particularly when it is associated with oral anticoagulant overdose. We describe two patients on treatment with warfarin who presented with a bleeding diathesis and disproportionately prolonged APTT, which led to the diagnosis of antibodies directed against factor VIII.

Tuberculosis complicating treatment of hepatitis C in an HIV-infected haemophilia A patient.

Pegylated interferon (pegIFN)/ribavirin has been established as the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected individuals [1-3]. We report the case of an individual who was well prior to treatment, but was diagnosed with tuberculous adenitis after receiving 12 weeks of pegIFN/ribavirin therapy. The association of pegIFN and ribavirin therapy with tuberculosis (TB) has not been described previously.

Experience of prophylaxis treatment in children with severe haemophilia.

The practice of prophylactic treatment of boys with severe haemophilia has been evaluated in our centre. Prophylaxis was started at the median age of 3.7 years (range 0.4-12.7 years) in 38/41 children (93%) under 17 years of age. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0.4-12.7 years). The criteria of primary prophylaxis according to the definition by the European Paediatric Network of Haemophilia Management was fulfilled by 9/38 (24%). Although a majority [76%, 29/38] of the children started prophylaxis after a median number of joint bleeds of 3.5, 70% of the children in this group had clinical joint scores of 0. Intravenous catheter insertion was required at a median age of 15.5 months (range 5-36 months) in 21% of the children, resulting in a catheter infection rate of 1.74 per 1000 catheter days. None developed an inhibitor on prophylaxis and three patients who had low-titre inhibitors (< 5 Bethesda units) prior to prophylaxis had undetectable inhibitors after prophylaxis. The home-treatment training programme required considerable time and cost. As a result, 87% of the children used peripheral venous access and hospital visits declined as prophylaxis became established. Parents' incentives for prophylaxis were that the children undertook many physical activities and sports previously not recommended, there was less parental anxiety and an overall improvement in the quality of life for the whole family.

Multiple myeloma and human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection.

Multiple myeloma (MM) in three human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is reported. HIV infection predisposes to the development of high-grade B-cell lymphomas, but few cases of plasma cell tumours in association with HIV have been reported. The coincidence of HIV infection and neoplasia highlights the distinct roles of immunodeficiency and infection with herpesviridae, including HIV itself, in the pathogenesis of HIV-related tumours. In addition, a number of cytokines (e.g., interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and angiogenic factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and basic fibroblastic growth factor [bFGF]) may play a role in the initiation, maintenance, and progression of multiple myeloma (MM). Infection was the first clinical consideration to the cause of the illness in two of our HIV-seropositive patients. The diagnosis of MM may be difficult in patients with advanced HIV infection as they often have renal failure, bone marrow plasmacytosis, repeated infections, and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia, due to HIV infection itself, opportunistic pathogens, and/or medication.

Carriage of antibiotic-resistant pneumococci among Asian children: a multinational surveillance by the Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP).

To investigate the nasal carriage of antibiotic-resistant pneumococci by children, anterior nasal swabs were done for 4963 children <5 years old in 11 countries in Asia and the Middle East. In total, 1105 pneumococci isolates (carriage rate, 22.3%) were collected, 35.8% of which were found to be nonsusceptible to penicillin. Prevalence of penicillin nonsusceptibility was highest in Taiwan (91.3%), followed by Korea (85.8%), Sri Lanka (76.5%), and Vietnam (70.4%). Penicillin resistance was related to residence in urban areas, enrollment in day care, and a history of otitis media. The most common serogroups were 6 (21.5%), 23 (16.5%), and 19 (15.7%). The most common clone, as assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, was identical to the Spanish 23F clone and to strains of invasive isolates from adult patients. Data in this study documented the high rate of penicillin or multidrug resistance among isolates of pneumococci carried nasally in children in Asia and the Middle East and showed that this is due to the spread of a few predominant clones in the region.

A survey of patients with acquired haemophilia in a haemophilia centre over a 28-year period.

Data of patients with acquired inhibitors to clotting factors seen in a haemophilia centre from 1970-98 was collected. Twenty-four patients with anti-factor VIII antibodies and four with acquired von Willebrand disease case records were evaluable. Two-thirds of the patients were females and their age ranged from 2 to 92 years (median 69). There was no correlation between the inhibitor titres and the severity or the pattern of bleeding. Porcine factor VIII and activated prothrombin complex were both effective for acute bleeds. Prednisolone and cyclophosphamide proved valuable for suppression of the antibodies without adverse effects even in the elderly group of patients. Three deaths were directly related to bleeding. This review has shown the life-threatening nature of this acquired bleeding disorder, its variable clinical presentation and the importance of early referral to a specialist centre for appropriate therapy.