Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Chim Acta ; 473: 71-74, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28830683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we reported on the impact of point-of-care testing (POCT) on practice efficiency in an academic primary care practice that was established to develop new models of care delivery. Here we report a follow-on confirmation study in a more typical primary care practice in the community. METHODS: In this observational study with a retrospective comparison analysis we measured metrics of practice efficiency on two patient cohorts: those that did not receive POCT and those that did. RESULTS: In the patient cohort that received POCT there was a 99% reduction in letters to patients (p<0.001), a 75% decrease in calls to patients (not significant due to small numbers), a 50% reduction in follow-up tests per visit (p=0.044) and a 38% reduction in follow-up visits due to abnormal test results (p=0.178). Financial analysis including testing costs, revenues and efficiency gains to the practice demonstrated a net financial benefit of $11.90-14.74 per patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the earlier published findings that POCT can improve metrics of practice efficiency in a primary care practice.


Subject(s)
Internal Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Testing/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...