ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This exploratory study examined the facilitators of and barriers to acceptance of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and potential risk compensation behaviour emerging from its use among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender individuals (TGs) in India. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 400 individuals registered with a targeted intervention programme. Logistic regression models were used to identify facilitators of and barriers to PrEP acceptance. RESULTS: The respondents consisted of 68% MSM and 32% TGs. Risk behaviour categorization identified 40% as low risk, 41% as medium risk and, 19% as high risk for HIV infection. About 93% of the respondents were unaware of PrEP, but once informed about it, 99% were willing to use PrEP. The facilitators of PrEP acceptance were some schooling [odds ratio (OR) 2.16; P = 0.51], being married or in a live-in relationship (OR 2.08; P = 0.46), having a high calculated risk (OR 3.12; P = 0.33), and having a high self-perceived risk (OR 1.8; P = 0.35). Increasing age (OR 2.12; P = 0.04) was a significant barrier. TGs had higher odds of acceptance of PrEP under conditions of additional cost (OR 2.12; P = 0.02) and once-daily pill (OR 2.85; P = 0.04). Individuals identified as low risk for HIV infection showed lower odds of potential risk compensation, defined as more sexual partners (OR 0.8; P = 0.35), unsafe sex with new partners (OR 0.71; P = 0.16), and decreased condom use with regular partners (OR 0.95; P = 0.84), as compared with medium-risk individuals. The associations, although not statistically significant, are nevertheless important for public health action given the limited scientific evidence on PrEP use among MSM and TGs in India. CONCLUSIONS: With high acceptability and a low likelihood of risk compensation behaviour, PrEP can be considered as an effective prevention strategy for HIV infection among MSM and TGs in India.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Transgender Persons/psychology , Adult , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Risk Behaviors , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
A total of four cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates were obtained from two CMV seronegative patients, each of whom received a lung transplant from the same seropositive donor. CMV was isolated from Patient 1 from two bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) specimens, one obtained during treatment with ganciclovir (GCV) and a second during later treatment with foscarnet. Both of these isolates are sensitive to GCV and foscarnet. CMV was isolated from Patient 2 from a blood and a BAL specimen obtained during treatment with GCV. Both of these isolates are resistant to GCV and show reduced GCV phosphorylation. Patient 1 is still alive 33 months posttransplant. Patient 2 died 6 1/2 months posttransplant. Although the four strains differ with respect to GCV susceptibility and phosphorylation, their DNA restriction fragment hybridization patterns and UL97 kinase gene sequences indicate that they are closely related. The restriction fragment hybridization patterns are identical among the strains, while these patterns differ markedly from those of unrelated strains. The DNA sequences of the UL97 genes of the strains from Patient 2 differ by only one nucleotide from those of Patient 1. The same comparison with unrelated strains shows a minimum of 12 nucleotide differences. The nucleotide change in the strains from Patient 2 produces an amino acid substitution of serine for leucine at residue 595, a substitution that was previously shown to transfer GCV resistance. Both patients, therefore, were apparently infected with the same donor strain, but during the course of GCV prophylaxis and treatment, a GCV-resistant mutant strain was selected in Patient 2.