Are We on the Same Page? A Cross-Sectional Study of Patient-Clinician Goal Concordance in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-clinician goal concordance is associated with improved outcomes in certain chronic diseases but not explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined goal concordance, correlates of concordance, and the association of concordance with health outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients with RA seen at least 1 time in the prior 12 months at 1 of 2 rheumatology clinics participated. Patients and their clinicians independently ranked top 3 goals for RA treatment from 8 options before a routine visit. Patients completed postvisit surveys on health, demographic information, health literacy, and adherence. Goal concordance was defined as the patient's number 1 goal being among the clinician's top 3 goals for that patient. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of concordance. RESULTS: Patients were 58% female and 16% Spanish-speaking, and 29% had limited health literacy. Among 204 patient-clinician dyads, 20% were goal-discordant. "Have less pain" was selected by both patient and clinician in 81% of dyads, followed by "have fewer problems doing daily activities" by 63%. Otherwise, clinicians prioritized avoiding side effects, whereas patients ranked improved sleep, fatigue, and mood. Longer disease duration was associated with discordance (median 13.3 years, interquartile range [IQR] 5.2-20 among discordant vs. 7 years, IQR 4-14; P = 0.039); higher depressive symptoms were associated with concordance (8.1% vs. 24%; P = 0.04). Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence (adjusted odds ratio 2.76 [95% confidence interval 1.01, 7.56]). CONCLUSION: One in 5 patient-clinician dyads had discordant treatment goals. Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence. Studies to improve goal elicitation and communication of patients with RA's priorities are needed.

Assessment of Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Underground Hard Rock and Other Mining Industry Workers in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah.

Importance: Respirable silica exposure has been strongly and consistently linked to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among foundry workers, persons in the construction trades, stone crushers and drillers, and coal miners. However, risk of RA in hard rock mining has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective: To analyze occupational risk of RA in hard rock miners in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study estimated the association between mining industry work and reported RA in a random-digit telephone survey of men 50 years or older living in selected counties with elevated levels of pneumoconiosis mortality (N = 1988). The survey was conducted between January 12 and May 4, 2021. Exposures: Underground hard rock and other mining and related mineral-processing occupations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Report of a clinician diagnosis of RA further defined by treatment with corticosteroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Risk was estimated using logistic regression. Results: The analytic sample of 1988 men (survey response rate, 11.1% of all contacts) had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (10.1) years. Underground hard rock mining was reported by 118 (5.9%); underground mining of other types, predominantly coal mining (no concomitant hard rock), 62 (3.1%); and surface mining or ore processing (no underground), 262 (13.2%). Adjusting for age and smoking and accounting for nonmining silica exposure, mining employment was associated with increased odds of corticosteroid-treated RA (n = 89) (odds ratio, 4.12 [95%, 2.49-6.81]). The odds were similar for RA treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (n = 80) (odds ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.93-5.66]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional survey study, workers in hard rock and other underground mining and surface mining occupations experienced 3- to 4-fold increased odds of RA. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider patients with relevant work exposures as at higher risk for developing RA.

Dusty trades and associated rheumatoid arthritis in a population-based study in the coal mining counties of Appalachia.

OBJECTIVES: We previously showed increased coal mining-associated risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Using additional survey data, we sought to delineate this risk further. METHODS: We used data from two cross-sectional, random-digit-dial, population-based surveys (males;≥50 years) in selected counties in the Appalachian region of the inland, mid-Atlantic USA with elevated pneumoconiosis mortality. Surveys ascertained age, smoking, coal mining and non-coal silica exposure jobs. In a subset, we surveyed ergonomic exposures, scored by intensity. We queried diagnosis of RA, corticosteroid use, and, in a subset, use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Multivariable logistic regression modelled RA risk (defined by glucocorticoid or DMARDs use) associated with coal mining employment, other silica exposure, smoking status, and age and ergonomic exposures. RESULTS: We analysed data for 2981 survey respondents (mean age 66.6 years; 15% current, 44% ex-smokers). The prevalence of glucocorticoid-treated and DMARD-treated RA was 11% and 4%, respectively. Glucocorticoid-treated RA was associated with coal mining (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.5 to 4.9) and non-coal mining silica exposure (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4 to 4.4). For DMARD-treated RA, the odds associated with coal mining and other silica remained elevated: OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.18, 4.5) and OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.51, 5.0), respectively. In the same model, the highest intensity ergonomic exposure also was associated with increased odds of RA (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.96 to 9.6). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a strong association between coal mining and other silica-exposing dusty trades and RA. Clinicians and insurers should consider occupational histories in the aetiology of RA.

The Impact of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

BACKGROUND: Risk of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be elevated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but little research has studied the impact of these conditions on SLE outcomes. We examined prevalence, incidence, and impact of self-reported asthma and COPD in two US-based SLE cohorts (FORWARD and Lupus Outcomes Study [LOS]). METHODS: Prevalence of asthma and COPD were defined as presence of conditions at individuals' first interviews; incidence was defined as new reports over the next 3 years. Cross-sectional associations of asthma/COPD with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and longitudinal analyses associations with asthma/COPD at entry with PROs 3 years later were examined. RESULTS: In FORWARD, 19.8% and 8.3% participants reported asthma and COPD, respectively, at entry. In LOS, 36.0% reported the presence of either (US population comparisons: asthma, 9.7%; COPD, 6.1%). Cross-sectionally, asthma/COPD was associated with worse PROs, including disease activity. In FORWARD, individuals with asthma experienced greater worsening of fatigue, pain, and global health ratings longitudinally; individuals with COPD experienced greater increases in self-reported SLE activity. However, no such patterns were noted in the LOS. CONCLUSION: Asthma and COPD appeared to be more common in SLE than in the general US population and were associated with worse status on PROs cross-sectionally. Asthma was linked to decrements in PROs longitudinally.

Socioeconomic Status, Health Care, and Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affects those with low socioeconomic status. Evidence from the past 2 decades has revealed clearer distinctions on the mechanisms of poverty that affect long-term outcomes in SLE. Poverty exacerbates direct, indirect, and humanistic costs and is associated with worse SLE disease damage, greater mortality, and poorer quality of life. Ongoing commitments from medicine and society are required to reduce disparities, improve access to care, and bolster resilience in persons with SLE who live in poverty.

Relationships Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health Status in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with poor adult health and immune dysregulation. The impact of ACEs on patients with autoimmune disease is unknown. The present study was undertaken to compare the prevalence of ACEs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to a population-based survey estimate and to investigate relationships between ACEs and SLE outcomes. METHODS: Data derived from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study (CLUES), a sample of adult patients with SLE. Participants completed a 10-item ACE questionnaire covering 3 domains (abuse, neglect, household challenges). We estimated ACE prevalence in 269 CLUES participants compared to geographically matched respondents from the 2015 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which was standardized to CLUES participant characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity). We examined associations of patient-reported and physician-assessed health status measures with overall ACE levels and domains using multivariable linear regression, controlling for sociodemographics, nephritis, and juvenile-onset SLE. RESULTS: Although specific domains varied, overall ACE levels were similar for CLUES and BRFSS respondents. Among SLE patients, 63.2% had ≥1 ACE, and 19.3% had ≥4. ACEs were more prevalent in those who were older, women, Latino or African American, and without college degrees, but not in those with lupus nephritis. In adjusted models, higher ACE levels and ACE domains were associated with worse patient-reported SLE activity, depression, and health status but were not significantly associated with physician-assessed SLE activity, damage, or severity. CONCLUSION: Given the association between ACE levels and important patient-reported outcomes in SLE, our study reinforces the need for prevention of ACEs in childhood and for clinical interventions to promote resilience among adults who have experienced ACEs.

Longitudinal Study of Fatigue, Stress, and Depression: Role of Reduction in Stress Toward Improvement in Fatigue.

OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is common among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the causes are not well understood. Our objective was to examine perceived stress and depressive symptoms as predictors of fatigue in SLE. METHODS: Data from 2 years of the Lupus Outcomes Study (n = 650 patients), obtained through annual structured interviews, were used. Fatigue was measured with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) vitality scale along with a variety of self-report measures of disease, depression, and stress. Multivariate linear regression models examined predictors of changes in fatigue. Model 1 tested the association of time 1 (T1) depression with time 2 (T2) fatigue; model 2 added T1 perceived stress to model 1, and final models added T1-to-T2 decrease in stress. All analyses controlled for T1 fatigue, age, sex, self-report of fibromyalgia, pain, and SLE duration, activity, and damage. RESULTS: Mean ± SD age was 51 ± 12 years, 92% of participants were women, and 68% were white. The mean ± SD SF-36 fatigue score was 55 ± 24. T1 depression significantly predicted T2 fatigue. When T1 stress was added, stress (ß = 1.7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1, 2.2]; P < 0.0001) significantly predicted T2 fatigue, but depression was no longer significant. The addition of T1-to-T2 decrease in stress was associated with a clinically meaningful decline in fatigue (ß = -11.8 [95% CI -15.6, -8.9]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: While depressive symptoms initially predicted subsequent fatigue, the effects were mediated by stress. A decrease in stress, in addition, was associated with a clinically meaningful decrease in fatigue. These results suggest that perceived stress plays an important role in SLE fatigue and may be an important focus of interventions for fatigue.

The Impact of Frailty on Changes in Physical Function and Disease Activity Among Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced physical function and frailty are common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, relationships between frailty and changes in physical function and disease activity over time in RA are unknown. We tested whether frailty is a risk factor for worsening patient-reported physical function and disease activity in RA. METHODS: Adults from a longitudinal RA cohort (N = 124) participated. By using an established frailty definition, individuals with three or more of the following deficits were considered frail: 1) body mass index less than or equal to 18.5, 2) low grip strength, 3) severe fatigue, 4) slow 4-m walking speed, and 5) low physical activity. Individuals with one to two or zero deficits were considered "pre-frail" or "robust," respectively. Physical function and RA disease activity were assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI), respectively, at baseline and follow-up 2 years later. Regression analyses modeled associations of frailty status with change in HAQ and RADAI scores between baseline and follow-up with and without controlling for covariates. Associations of individual frailty components with change in HAQ and RADAI scores were also examined. RESULTS: Among adults with RA, baseline frailty status predicted significant increases, or worsening, in HAQ (ß: 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.8; P < 0.01) but not RADAI scores (ß: 0.5; 95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 1.5; P > 0.05) between baseline and follow-up in fully adjusted models. Fatigue was an important contributor to this effect. CONCLUSION: Frailty may be an important risk factor for reduced physical function over time in RA. Future studies should address whether interventions to reduce frailty improve physical function in RA.

Prevalence of Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis in Coal Mining Counties of the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to inhaled mineral dust, in particular silica, is associated with increased odds of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases. We studied the association of RA with work-related coal and silica exposure in the Appalachian region of the US. METHODS: We carried out a random-digit dialed telephone survey in selected counties in Appalachia that had elevated coal workers' pneumoconiosis mortality. Our study cohort included men ages ≥50 with any employment history, and we assessed exposure to coal mining employment, other work-related dust, and ergonomic factors. We ascertained self-reported physician diagnosis of any arthritis and of RA with glucocorticoid treatment. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and associated population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates. RESULTS: Among the 973 men who met study entry criteria (mean ± SD ages 66 ± 10 years; 54% ever smokers), 266 (27%) reported coal mining work and 189 (19%) reported other work-related silica exposure. There were 517 men (53%), who reported any arthritis and 112 (12%) whose disease met the study definition of RA. Adjusting for covariates, coal mining was associated with elevated odds of RA (OR 3.6 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.1-6.2]), which accounted for a PAF of 33% (95% CI 26-40%) of the men studied. For any arthritis, the coal mining-associated OR was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6-3.2), with an associated PAF of 20% (95% CI 14-25%). CONCLUSION: In this population of older males living in a coal mining region, we estimated that 20% of arthritis and 33% of RA may be attributable to coal mining work.

Poverty, Neighborhoods, Persistent Stress, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outcomes: A Qualitative Study of the Patients' Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain the perspective of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) regarding the role of poverty, neighborhood, and chronic stress in SLE outcomes. METHODS: Through annual structured interviews as part of the Lupus Outcomes Study, 723 persons with SLE were followed from 2003 to 2015 in order to establish the effect of combinations of poverty, persistent poverty, residence in an area of concentrated poverty, access to health care, and chronic stress on accumulated damage. We obtained a sample of 28 of the 723 individuals on the basis of household income, geography, and outcomes in their last interview, and administered qualitative interviews to explore their perspectives on the impact of these factors on SLE outcomes. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Persons in poverty frequently reported that poverty necessitated a choice to deal with food, medical care, and housing insecurity on a daily basis and to relegate their management of SLE to occurrences of disease flares. They also reported that exposure to crime in their neighborhoods was a stressor that triggered worse disease activity. Affluent participants reported that neighborhood neither helped nor hindered dealing with SLE, because they relied on networks not tied to neighborhoods to deal with SLE. CONCLUSION: Mitigating poverty and reducing exposure to crime through moving to safer neighborhoods are factors identified by individuals with SLE as potentially critical in disease outcomes.

Association of Medication Beliefs, Self-efficacy, and Adherence in a Diverse Cohort of Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) is often suboptimal. We examined associations among medication beliefs, self-efficacy, and adherence to medications in RA. METHODS: Data were from a longitudinal observational cohort of persons with RA. Subjects completed telephone interviews on self-reported adherence, self-efficacy, demographics, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), which assesses beliefs in necessity and beliefs about taking medication. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression identified correlates of poor adherence to synthetic DMARD and prednisone as well as to biologic therapy, including medication concerns and necessity. RESULTS: There were 362 patients who reported taking a synthetic DMARD and/or prednisone. Of these, 14% and 21% reported poor adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, and biologics, respectively. There were 64% who reported concern about taking medicines, 81% about longterm effects, and 47% about becoming too dependent on medicines. In multivariate analyses, the BMQ necessity score was independently associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91), while self-efficacy was associated with greater odds of poor adherence to oral medications (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.59). Beliefs in medicines and self-efficacy were not associated with adherence to biologics. CONCLUSION: In a diverse cohort of patients with RA, stronger beliefs in the necessity of medication were associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, while higher self-efficacy was associated with poor adherence. Providers can play important roles in eliciting patient beliefs about medications to improve adherence and ultimately health outcomes.

Experience and Context Shape Patient and Clinician Goals For Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Alignment of patient and clinician goals, which is central to effective patient-centered care, has been linked to improved patient experience and outcomes but has not been explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to analyze goal conceptualization among RA patients and clinicians. METHODS: Seven focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview were conducted with RA patients and clinicians who were recruited from 4 rheumatology clinics. An interview guide was developed to explore goal concordance related to RA treatment. Researchers utilized a concurrent deductive-inductive data analysis approach. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age 55 years, 74% female, 32% non-white, and 26% Spanish-speaking) and 18 clinicians (44% trainees, 44% female, 28% non-white) participated. Across clinician and patient focus groups, the 2 identified domains were patient knowledge of RA and psychosocial dynamics (stress) in RA treatment. Within the knowledge domain, 3 themes emerged: RA knowledge for informed choice, RA knowledge to ensure adherence and medication safety, and clinician assumption of patient inability to interpret information. Within the second domain of RA and stress, 2 themes emerged: patient illness experience informs treatment context in ways that are not shared by clinicians, and the impact of patient-clinician communication and decision-making on goal concordance. CONCLUSION: Knowledge is a shared goal, but RA patients and clinicians hold divergent attitudes towards this goal. While knowledge is integral to self-management and effective shared decision-making, mismatches in attitudes may lead to suboptimal communication. Tools to support patient goal-directed RA care may promote high quality patient-centered care and result in reduced disparities.

Smoking Is the Most Significant Modifiable Lung Cancer Risk Factor in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess lung cancer risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), relative to demographics, drug exposures, smoking, and disease activity. METHODS: We analyzed data from 14 SLE cohorts. We calculated adjusted HR estimates for lung cancer in SLE, relative to demographics, smoking, time-dependent medication exposures, and cumulative disease activity [mean adjusted SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores]. This project was approved by the ethics boards of all participating institutions, including the Institutional Review Board of the McGill University Health Centre. The ethics approval number for the Cancer Risk study is GEN-06-031. RESULTS: Within these 14 SLE cohorts, 49 incident lung cancers occurred. Among lung cancer cases, 59.0% were in the highest SLEDAI quartile at baseline versus 40.8% of lung cancer-free SLE controls. The vast majority (84.2%) of SLE lung cancer cases were ever-smokers at baseline, versus 40.1% of those without lung cancer. In adjusted models, the principal factors associated with lung cancer were ever smoking (at cohort entry) and current age. Estimated adjusted effects of all drugs were relatively imprecise, but did not point toward any drug exposures as strong lung cancer risk factors. CONCLUSION: We saw no clear evidence for drugs as a trigger for lung cancer risk in SLE, although drug risk estimates were relatively imprecise. Smoking may be the most significant modifiable lung cancer risk factor in SLE.

Socioeconomic Predictors of Incident Depression in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess different measures of socioeconomic status (SES) as predictors of incident depression among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Data were derived from the 2010-2015 waves of the Lupus Outcomes Study, where individuals with confirmed SLE were interviewed annually by telephone. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, using a validated lupus-specific cutoff (≥23) for major depressive disorder. Women interviewed in ≥2 consecutive waves, with scores <23 in the first wave (T1), were included. The level of financial strain was classified as high, moderate, or none based on responses to 3 questions. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the impact of poverty status, income, education, and financial strain at T1 on the risk of incident depression the next year (T2), with adjustment for sociodemographic and disease status measures. Individuals could contribute more than one 2-year dyad to the analysis. RESULTS: In total, 682 women contributed 2,097 observations, with 19% having high financial strain, 47% moderate strain, and 34% no strain. There were 166 women who had 184 episodes of incident depression (rate = 8.8/100 person-years). In bivariate analysis, poverty, lower income and education, disease activity, and high financial strain were associated with depression onset; race/ethnicity was not. Poverty, income, and education were not significant in multivariate analyses, but disease activity and high financial strain were (odds ratio 1.85 [95% confidence interval 1.06-3.23]). CONCLUSION: High financial strain was a significant predictor of new-onset depression in women with SLE, controlling for disease factors and other SES measures. Determining specific, modifiable sources of financial strain may help prevent the development of depression.