ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There is only one study in the literature in which 3D evaluation of sphenoid sinus volume in patients with cleft lip and palate was used. This shows that this issue has not been adequately evaluated. The present study aimed to compare the volume of the sphenoid sinuses in patients with cleft lip and palate on cone-beam computed tomography images, and to compare them with healthy controls. The high variability of sphenoid sinus volumes poses a risk for iatrogenic lesions during surgical procedures. Because the degree of pneumatization due to increased volume increases the likelihood of exposure of vital neurovascular structures such as the internal carotid artery, maxillary nerves, and optic nerves. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 64 patients (32 cleft palate, 32 controls) over 18 years of age who had sphenoid sinuses in the image area were included in our study. OUTCOMES: Sphenoid Sinus Volume. RESULTS: When the groups were compared in terms of total sinus volume, there was a statistically significant difference between them. Total sinus volume was significantly mean 2.806,87â mm lower in patients with cleft lip and palate compared to the healthy group (P = .015). CONCLUSION: To be aware this lower volume of the sphenoid sinus in cleft lip and palate patients will be useful for the surgical approach to sphenoid sinus. However, the literature on the subject is insufficient, more comprehensive clinical and radiological studies are needed on a larger sample.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of multiheaded condyles (MHC) in a group of Turkish subjects using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: In this retrospective study, CBCT scans of 975 patients (546 female, 429 male; age 15-89 years, mean age 42.46 years) who were referred to Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Bifid and trifid mandibular condyle cases were analyzed according to the patients' age, gender, and laterality, and their frequencies were determined statistically. RESULTS: A multiheaded mandibular condyle (MHC) was detected in 57 of the 975 patients (546 female, 429 male). MHC was diagnosed unilaterally in 49 patients; in 8 patients, it was observed bilaterally. A bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) was detected in 54 patients. A trifid mandibular condyle (TMC) was found in 2 women, and one tetrafid mandibular condyle was seen in 1 woman. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MHC was 5.84% in our proband, which is higher than in previous studies. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of MHC in males or females.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Panoramic radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are traditionally used for imaging temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and its pathologies. Besides these radiographic techniques, the recent use of ultrasonography (US) in diagnosing joint diseases has been introduced. However, there is no prospective clinical study examining the application of US in imaging of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) patients. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the features of the joint and surrounding structures in the US in TMD patients. METHODS: 320 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 100 of these individuals accepted to participate in the study. This study evaluated 200 TMJ; including the right TMJ and left TMJ of 100 patients. The study was designed as a clinical single-blind observational device trial. RESULTS: It has been seen that women are 3.54 times more likely to have muscle pain than men. It has been determined that the probability of joint pain increased as the joint space with the mouth closed increased. It has been seen that women are 3.61 times more likely to experience headaches than men. CONCLUSIONS: The US, which is becoming increasingly common in dentistry, can be used as an aid in TMD diagnoses. US will not be sufficient when it is desired to evaluate the TMJ joint area more precisely and clearly in patients who will be planned for advanced surgical intervention. Therefore, it may be necessary to refer for MRI. The values of our findings will be a reference in TMD diagnoses. GOV ID: NCT04452110.
