Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Knee Surg ; 36(6): 584-590, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879407

ABSTRACT

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant cause of pain and disability worldwide. Imaging provides diagnosis, prognostication, and follow-up. Radiographs are first line, useful, and inexpensive. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect additional features not seen on radiograph, but it is of questionable usefulness in the management of knee OA. Our aim was to investigate the usefulness of MRI in the workup of knee OA and whether MRI alters management in knee OA. A retrospective review was performed of consecutive MRI knees performed for knee pain in those over 50 years. Clinical information and documentation of management plan pre- and post-MRI were collected. Assessment was made whether the MRI results influenced the final management plan. Of the 222 MRI knees included for study, the majority (62.2%) had not had a recent radiograph. OA was reported in 86.9% of radiographs and 89.6% of MRI. On MRI, the most prevalent finding was tearing/abnormality of the medial meniscus, seen in 47% of MRIs overall, increasing to all in severe OA. MRI assisted with management in 9.5% of all (21/222) patients, and changed management plans in 23% of those that had documented management plans prior to the MRI (6/26 patients). MRIs can guide tailored management in knee OA and are useful for surgical planning; however, they should only be ordered in certain cases, and a radiograph should always be performed first. MRI should be considered if symptoms are not explained by OA alone or the appropriate treatment option requires MRI.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain
2.
Radiol Case Rep ; 16(3): 487-492, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33363688

ABSTRACT

Primary synovial chondromatosis is a rare benign neoplastic process, in which cartilaginous nodules are produced in the subsynovial tissue. It has 3 main subtypes (intra-articular, tenosynovial and bursal). We present the case of a 61-year-old female, with a mass involving her right thumb for at least 5 years, which had recently increased in size. X-ray showed a soft tissue mass, without calcification or any underlying bony abnormality. Ultrasound and MRI showed a 6-cm mass surrounding the right flexor pollicis longus tendon of the right thumb. The patient went on to have surgical resection and was given a diagnosis of tenosynovial chondromatosis.

3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(8): 2208-2215, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738752

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Identifying fluid responsiveness is critical to optimizing perfusion while preventing fluid overload. An experimental study of hypovolemic shock resuscitation showed the importance of ventricular compliance and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) on fluid responsiveness. The authors tested the hypothesis that reduced ventricular compliance measured using transesophageal echocardiography results in decreased fluid responsiveness after a fluid bolus. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Two-center, university hospital study. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 29 patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization. INTERVENTION: Albumin 5%, 7 mL/kg, was infused over 10 minutes to characterize fluid responders (>15% increase in stroke volume) from nonresponders. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Invasive hemodynamics and the ratio of mitral inflow velocity (E-wave)/annular relaxation (e'), or E/e' ratio, were measured using transesophageal echocardiography to assess left ventricular (LV) compliance at baseline and after albumin infusion. Fifteen patients were classified as responders and 14 as nonresponders. The E/e' ratio in responders was 7.4 ± 1.9 at baseline and 7.1 ± 1.8 after bolus. In contrast, E/e' was significantly higher in nonresponders at baseline (10.7 ± 4.6; p = 0.04) and further increased after bolus (12.6 ± 5.5; p = 0.002). PVP was significantly greater in the nonresponders at baseline (14 ± 4 mmHg v 11 ± 3 mmHg; p = 0.02) and increased in both groups after albumin infusion. Fluid responsiveness was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and was 0.74 for the E/e' ratio (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.93; p = 0.029) and 0.72 for the PVP (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.92; p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: Fluid responders had normal LV compliance and lower PVP at baseline. In contrast, nonresponders had reduced LV compliance, which worsened after fluid bolus. E/e,' more than PVP, may be a useful clinical index to predict fluid responsiveness.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Diastole/physiology , Fluid Therapy/methods , Venous Pressure/physiology , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Coronary Artery Bypass/trends , Female , Fluid Therapy/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/trends , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...