ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: To profile conjunctival T cell populations in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients after instillation of daily topical cyclosporine-A (CsA) 0.1% cationic emulsion (Ikervis), and to evaluate patients' tolerance to these eye drops. METHODS: Nineteen participants were prescribed Ikervis prophylaxis once daily to both eyes from 3-5 weeks pre-HSCT to 12 months post-HSCT. The outcome measure was conjunctival T cell proportions from flow cytometry after impression cytology. Covariates included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit lamp and fundal examination, dry eye (SPEED) and quality of life questionnaires, non-invasive keratograph tear break-up time (NIKBUT), conjunctival redness, meibography, lipid thickness, Schirmer test, tear cytokines, fluorescein staining, tear osmolarity, and meibomian gland expressibility. RESULTS: The conjunctival T cell analysis showed either stable or decreased proportions of conjunctival CD4 T cells at the last visit from baseline in compliant patients. CD4 proportions were increased in non-compliant patients and in the single patient who developed ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). All patients were tolerant to Ikervis but 6/19 were not compliant. In the majority of patients, vision did not affect activities of daily living. Pre- and post-HSCT up to the last study visit, there was no statistically significant change in clinical covariates. Only one participant developed ocular GVHD at 9 months post-HSCT. CONCLUSION: Superficial conjunctival T cell profile reflects compliance to daily topical Ikervis eye drops and clinical ocular surface parameters in allogenic HSCT patients. Tolerance is comparable to other formulations of topical CsA in the first 12 months. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04636918. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04636918?cond=ocular+Graft+Versus+Host+Disease&cntry=SG&draw=2&rank=2 .
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The side effects of dry eye medications can lead to medication non-adherence and, eventually, to poor outcomes. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the side effects of dry eye disease (DED) medications (burning/stinging sensation and blurring) are important to patients compared to medication benefits or costs. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with DED were recruited at a referral eye center in Singapore (n = 139). This study utilized a Discrete Choice Experiment where patients were presented with 10 choice tasks where they were asked to choose between their current medication (or no medication), and two hypothetical medications that varied based on five attributes: duration of burning/stinging, duration of blurring, time to medication effectiveness, medication frequency, and out-of-pocket cost. The main outcomes were relative attribute importance and predicted uptake. RESULTS: Latent class logistic regressions found two groups with distinct preferences. For both classes, duration of burning/stinging (Class 1 = 23%, Class 2 = 29%) and cost (Class 1 = 24%, Class 2 = 27%) were the most important attributes while duration of blurring (Class 1 = 15%, Class 2 = 9%) was the least important. The predicted uptake of a medication increased 18 percentage-points when burning/stinging duration decreased from 2 h to a few minutes. The predicted uptake for new medications was lowest for those on medication with well-controlled symptoms and highest for those who were not on medication and could not control their symptoms effectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that duration of burning/stinging was an important factor when choosing medications. Incorporating patient preferences in medication decisions can potentially improve patient acceptance of a treatment regimen.
