High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in advanced medial compartmental knee arthrosis: A comparative study with propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated knee medial compartmental osteoarthritis(MOA) can be treated with High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) or Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA). This study aims to describe and compare outcomes of HTO and UKA in patients with isolated severe MOA. The authors hypothesized that similar outcomes can be achieved. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively of HTOs and UKAs performed between January-2016 and April-2021 by a knee surgeon. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS) were collected pre-operatively, six-months and two-years post-surgery. OA severity was graded on pre-operative radiograph. Medial Proximal Tibia Angle (MPTA), Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA), Joint Line Convergence Angle (JLCA) and Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKAA), were measured on full-length radiograph. 47 HTO and 74 UKA were included. Propensity score matching was performed, accounting for preoperative scores, age, gender and body mass index (BMI), before statistical analysis. Level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age(56.42 vs 58.57, p = 0.067), BMI(29.82 vs 29.09, p = 0.484), gender distribution (p = 0.663) and laterality (p = 0.836). Pre-operatively, both groups were similar in clinical scores and lower limb alignment. On follow-up, both groups achieved similar improvements in clinical scores. However, the HTO group reported poorer extension at 6-months (7.91° vs 4.80°, p = 0.013) and 2-years (5.57° vs 3.24°, p = 0.018). Three cases of hinge fracture and six cases of implant removal occurred in the HTO group. One case of tibial fracture occurred in the UKA group. CONCLUSIONS: In severe MOA, similar outcomes were achieved with HTO and UKA at two years.

Time course and correlates of psychological distress post spinal surgery: A longitudinal study.

Background: Psychological distress post lumbar spine surgery is associated with poorer outcomes. There is a scarcity of studies devoted to analyzing the risk factors associated with psychological distress in patients who have undergone lumbar fusion surgery. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the time course and severity of psychological distress using the STarT Back Tool (SBT) and (2) determine the demographic and clinical predictors of SBT score post lumbar spine fusion surgery. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study analyzed 227 subjects with 1- and 2-level lumbar fusion surgery who underwent standardized assessment preoperatively and at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative variables collected were demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Postoperative psychological distress was measured by self-reported SBT. Risk factors for SBT over time were identified using ordinal and mixed-effects modelling. Results: Although the trajectory of SBT levels declined postoperatively over time, at week-12, 20% of patients had moderate to high SBT. Postoperative SBT scores at week-4 time point was significantly greater than SBT scores at week-8 (OR = 2.7, 95% credible interval [CrI]; 1.8-3.9). Greater SBT scores at week-4 were strongly associated with greater SBT scores throughout 12 weeks of follow-up (OR = 7.3, [95% CrI; 1.2-31.4]). Greater postoperative SBT levels over time were associated with being male (OR = 2.2, 95% CrI; 1.0-3.9), greater preoperative back or leg pain intensity (OR = 2.2; 95% CrI: 1.0-4.4), greater preoperative leg weakness (OR = 4.2, 95% CrI: 1.7-7.5) and higher preoperative depression levels (OR = 4.8; 95% CrI: 1.6-10.4). Conclusion: Postoperative SBT levels declined nonlinearly over time. However, a sizable proportion of patients had moderate to high psychological distress at week-12 postsurgery. Greater preoperative back or leg pain intensity, leg weakness and depression levels, and male gender were risk factors of greater psychological distress postsurgery. Although requiring validation, our study has identified potential modifiable risk factors which may give an opportunity to provide early (preoperative) and targeted strategies to optimize postoperative psychosocial outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgeries.

Systems modelling as an approach for eliciting the mechanisms for hip fracture recovery among older adults in a participatory stakeholder engagement setting.

Introduction: Due to an aging population, the rising prevalence and incidence of hip fractures and the associated health and economic burden present a challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Studies have shown that a complex interplay of physiological, psychological, and social factors often affects the recovery trajectories of older adults with hip fractures, often complicating the recovery process. Methods: This research aims to actively engage stakeholders (including doctors, physiotherapists, hip fracture patients, and caregivers) using the systems modeling methodology of Group Model Building (GMB) to elicit the factors that promote or inhibit hip fracture recovery, incorporating a feedback perspective to inform system-wide interventions. Hip fracture stakeholder engagement was facilitated through the Group Model Building approach in a two-half-day workshop of 25 stakeholders. This approach combined different techniques to develop a comprehensive qualitative whole-system view model of the factors that promote or inhibit hip fracture recovery. Results: A conceptual, qualitative model of the dynamics of hip fracture recovery was developed that draws on stakeholders' personal experiences through a moderated interaction. Stakeholders identified four domains (i.e., expectation formation, rehabilitation, affordability/availability, and resilience building) that play a significant role in the hip fracture recovery journey.. Discussion: The insight that recovery of loss of function due to hip fracture is attributed to (a) the recognition of a gap between pre-fracture physical function and current physical function; and (b) the marshaling of psychological resilience to respond promptly to a physical functional loss via uptake of rehabilitation services is supported by findings and has several policy implications.

Large Versus Small Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomies Performed With a Protective Wire Over the Lateral Hinge: Incidence of Lateral Hinge Fracture and Early Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of lateral hinge fractures (LHFs) during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) is unacceptably high, especially with distractions >10 mm. LHFs result in malunion, loss of correction, and recurrence of symptoms adversely affecting clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the incidence of LHF when a protective guide wire is utilized during MOW-HTO in small and large corrections and (2) to study the effect of correction size on early clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 96 knees that underwent MOW-HTO between 2019 and 2020. A protective wire applied intraoperatively across the lateral hinge point before opening wedge distraction was performed for all patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on opening wedge sizes: group A (opening distraction <10 mm) and group B (opening distraction ≥10 mm). LHF and wound complications were recorded. Prospective Knee Score and Function Score (Knee Society), Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental Component Summaries of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Incidence of LHF was low in group A (n = 2; 6.1%) and group B (n = 3; 9.1%). A single case of intraoperative LHF was noted in each group, with each case resulting in a type 1 fracture. The incidence of postoperative fractures was comparable between groups (groups A vs B, n = 1 vs 2). At 6 months, clinical outcomes in group A were superior to those of group B (Knee Score, 85.7 ± 14.7 vs 73.1 ± 20.3, P = 0.028; Function Score, 73.5 ± 16.5 vs 63.1 ± 19.5, P = 0.047; Oxford Knee Score, 20.2 ± 4.7 vs 25.6 ± 8.5, P = 0.008; Physical Component Summary, 46.8 ± 8.1 vs 40.2 ± 10.9, P = 0.018). However, clinical outcomes were comparable at 2 years (P > .05). CONCLUSION: A protective wire was associated with a low incidence of LHF, even in larger MOW-HTO corrections. Large corrections had poorer clinical outcomes as compared with small corrections at 6 months. However, clinical outcomes between groups were comparable at 2 years.

Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Introduction: The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery. Aims: To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction. Methods: 1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2 years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score. Results: At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 (P < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups. Conclusions: Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.

Validity and Reliability of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) Score in Patients With Hallux Valgus in Singapore.

The European Foot and Ankle Society score is a popular tool for monitoring treatment outcomes of foot or ankle conditions. However, few studies have assessed its psychometric properties in patients with hallux valgus. We aimed to validate the European Foot and Ankle Society score in patients with hallux valgus in Singapore. This is a cohort study of 121 patients with operatively managed hallux valgus from a tertiary referral hospital, evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with the primary endpoint of restoring patients to premorbid status. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed through 7 a priori hypotheses by correlating the European Foot and Ankle Society score with other patient-reported outcomes measures. Structural validity was assessed via Confirmatory Factor Analysis, whereby a good fit was indicated when Comparative Fit Index >0.95, Tucker-Lewis Index >0.95, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation <0.06, and Standardized Root Mean Residuals <0.08. Among our subjects, the European Foot and Ankle Society score demonstrated reliability, reflected by a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.773). Six out of the 7 a priori hypotheses were fulfilled, indicating both convergent and divergent construct validity. Structural validity was confirmed with our European Foot and Ankle Society score model which showed good fit for a 1-factor structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis = 0.998, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.996, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.025 [90% CI: 0-0.111], Standardized Root Mean Residuals = 0.027). In conclusion, the European Foot and Ankle Society score was validated for monitoring treatment outcomes of patients with hallux valgus in Singapore.

Distalization of hinge site with use of hinge wire reduces hinge fracture rates in closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Closing wedge distal femoral osteotomies (CWDFO) are attractive treatment options for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with coronal plane deformity. However, it has been traditionally associated with high rates of hinge fracture that can adversely impact recovery and patient outcomes. Appropriate siting of hinge point can be an effective method of reducing the incidence of hinge fractures. This study aims to illustrate a case series of CWDFO with low rates of hinge fracture utilising our preferred hinge point site. METHODS: A retrospective study of a cohort of 39 CWDFO was performed between May 2019 and May 2022. Both medial and lateral CWDFO were included. The hinge point in all cases was placed at the level of the inferior margin of the metaphyseal flare, and inferior to the gastrocnemius origin, with a hinge thickness of 10 mm. Post-operative radiographs were obtained at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery to assess for hinge fracture and union. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of CWDFO were performed, consisting of eighteen cases of valgus malalignment that underwent medial CWDFO and twenty-one cases of varus malalignment that underwent lateral CWDFO. At surgery, the mean age was 47.6 (± 13.9) years and mean BMI was 29.4 (± 4.9). There were 23 men and 16 women. Three cases of hinge fractures occurred intraoperatively, translating into a hinge fracture rate of 7.69%. However, union was achieved in all three cases and all patients in this case series were able to progress to weight bear as tolerated at 2 months post-osteotomy. CONCLUSION: Distal placement of the hinge at the level of the inferior metaphyseal flare margin with the use of a hinge wire can greatly reduce the rates of hinge fracture in CWDFO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Radiological and Clinical Outcomes comparing 2-level MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: To compare early postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes between 2-level minimally invasive (MIS) trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: Fifty three consecutive patients undergoing 2-level lumbar interbody fusion from L3-L5 for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled. Twenty four patients underwent LLIF and 29 underwent TLIF. RESULTS: Operative time and length of stay were similar between LLIF and TLIF (272.8 ± 82.4 vs 256.1 ± 59.4 minutes; 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 4.7 ± 3.3 days, P > .05), whereas blood loss was lower for LLIF (229.0 ± 125.6 vs 302.4 ± 97.1mls, P = .026). Neurological deficits were more common in LLIF (9 vs 3, P = .025), whereas persistent deficits were rare for both (1 vs 1, P = 1). For both groups, all patient reported outcomes visual analogue scale (VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, SF-36 physical) improved from preoperative to 2-years postoperative (P < .05), with both groups showing no significant differences in extent of improvement for any outcome. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrated superior restoration of disc height (L3-L4: 4.1 ± 2.4 vs 1.2 ± 1.9 mm, P < .001; L4-L5: 4.6 ± 2.4 vs .8 ± 2.8 mm, P < .001), foraminal height (FH) (L3-L4: 3.5 ± 3.6 vs 1.0 ± 3.6 mm, P = .014; L4-L5: 3.0 ± 3.5 vs -.1 ± 4.4 mm, P = .0080), segmental lordosis (4.1 ± 6.4 vs -2.1 ± 8.1°, P = .005), lumbar lordosis (LL) (4.1 ± 7.0 vs -2.3 ± 12.6°, P = .026) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (-4.1 ± 7.0 vs 2.3 ± 12.6°, P = .019) at 2-years follow-up. CONCLUSION: The superior radiological outcomes demonstrated by 2-level trans-psoas LLIF did not translate into difference in clinical outcomes compared to 2-level TLIF at the 2-years follow-up, suggesting both approaches are reasonable for 2-level lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Radiofrequency Plantar Fascia Coblation With and Without Gastrocnemius Recession in the Management of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of plantar heel pain. Although most are self-limiting, recalcitrant conditions can be debilitating, significantly reducing patient's quality of life. A myriad of surgical procedures are available for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (RPF) with little consensus on best practice. This purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency coblation with and without gastrocnemius release on the surgical management of RPF. METHODS: Between June 2013 and June 2019, a total of 128 patients with RPF and tight gastrocnemius were treated surgically. Presence of tight gastrocnemius was assessed clinically by a positive Silfverskiold test. Group A (n = 73) consisted of patients who underwent radiofrequency coblation alone; group B (n = 55) consisted of patients who underwent radiofrequency coblation and endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) score. Secondary outcome measures included (1) American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score; (2) physical (PCS) and mental component summaries (MCS) of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; (3) overall assessment of improvement, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction; and (4) complication rates. RESULTS: Both groups reported significant improvement in VAS, AOFAS, and PCS scores postoperatively at 6 and 24 months. Group B (radiofrequency coblation with gastrocnemius recession) was associated with better VAS at both 6 months (3.0 ± 2.9 vs 1.7 ± 2.6, P < .05) and 24 months postoperatively (1.9 ± 3.1 vs 0.8 ± 2.0, P < .05) compared with group A (radiofrequency coblation without gastrocnemius recession). At 24 months postoperatively, no differences were found in AOFAS, PCS, MCS scores, expectation fulfilment, or overall satisfaction. No wound complications were reported in either group. One patient (group B) has persistent symptoms consistent with tarsal tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort comparative study, treatment of RPF with radiofrequency coblation alone was associated with slightly inferior results than radiofrequency coblation combined with endoscopic gastrocnemius recession in terms of pain relief without an increase in complication rates. However, at 2 years, we did not find a significant difference in other measures of outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Validity and Reliability of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score for the English-Literate Singapore Population With Hallux Valgus.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal (AOFAS MTP-IP) score in patients with hallux valgus in Singapore. METHOD: A total of 121 English-literate patients with hallux valgus identified between October 2017 and May 2020 were analyzed. Reliability was assessed via Cronbach α. Construct validity was evaluated through 20 a priori hypotheses by correlating the AOFAS MTP-IP score for hallux and lesser toes with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to evaluate responsiveness at 6 months postoperative. Structural validity was evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) whereby a good fit was indicated when comparative fit index (CFI) is >0.95, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) is >0.95 and standardized root mean residual (SRMR) is <0.08. RESULTS: The AOFAS MTP-IP score demonstrated reliability with a Cronbach α of 0.837. Convergent construct validity was confirmed when all a priori hypotheses were fulfilled. Structural validity was established with our AOFAS MTP-IP score model that displayed good fit for a 1-factor structure (CFI = 0.988, TLI = 0.960, SRMR = 0.034). Responsiveness of the AOFAS MTP-IP score for hallux was demonstrated by an SRM score of 1.28. CONCLUSION: The AOFAS MTP-IP score displayed adequate reliability and validity among English-literate patients in Singapore with an operatively managed hallux valgus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Factors Associated with Pain Intensity and Walking Disability After Lumbar Fusion: A Longitudinal Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal study. OBJECTIVE: To identify the preoperative factors associated with postoperative lumbar fusion recovery in back or leg pain, self-reported walking time, and gait speed over a 6-month period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The demand for lumbar fusion surgeries has significantly increased over the years. Yet, some patients report persistent postsurgical pain and poor functional outcomes. Unfortunately, the associated risk factors are not well understood. METHODS: The study analyzed 232 subjects with mono- or bisegmental lumbar fusion surgery who underwent standardized assessment preoperatively and at 4, 12, and 24weeks postoperatively. Preoperative variables collected were demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Back or leg pain was measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Walking disability was measured by self-reported walking time and performance-based fast gait speed. Risk factors of pain and walking disability over time were identified using ordinal and linear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: At 6 months post-surgery, 17% of patients reported having moderate or severe back/leg pain and 24% were unable to walk longer than 30 minutes. Greater preoperative self-reported leg weakness frequency and body-mass-index (BMI) were strongly associated with greater pain and walking disability. Additionally, greater preoperative depression symptoms were associated with greater back/leg pain (adjusted odds ratio = 4.0) and shorter walking time (adjusted odds ratio = 2.7)-but not with slower gait speed (difference = 0.01 m/s). Old age and female gender were strongly associated with gait speed but not with self-reported walking time. CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of patients had poor pain and walking outcomes even at 6 months post-surgery. Preoperative leg weakness and BMI were consistent risk factors and patients with greater depression symptoms may have poorer self-reported outcomes. Although requiring validation, our study has identified potentially modifiable risk factors which may give clinicians an opportunity to provide early (preoperative) and targeted intervention strategies to optimize postoperative outcomes.Level of Evidence: NA.

The Relationship Between Cervical Sagittal Balance and Adjacent Segment Disease After Three-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between cervical sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) development after 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is a common complication after ACDF. Previous studies have shown that sagittal imbalance may be associated with ASD development after 1-level or 2-level ACDF. However, these findings may not be generalizable to 3-level procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data of 46 patients who underwent 3-level ACDF at a tertiary institution. Lateral cervical radiographs taken preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up were reviewed for ASD. The mean follow-up duration was 5 years. Radiographic parameters measured were cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), segmental sagittal alignment, T1 slope (T1S), sagittal vertical axis, and T1S-cervical lordosis. RESULTS: ASD was present in 27 (58.7%) patients, but only 1 patient (2.2%) underwent reoperation at 4.8 years. The CSA, sagittal vertical axis, and T1S were similar preoperatively, but the T1S-cervical lordosis was higher in the ASD group (18.28 vs. 9.82, P =0.016). All 4 parameters were similar postoperatively and at last follow-up. The ASD group had a greater change in CSA over the follow-up period (-6.26 vs. -1.47, P =0.05), but they achieved similar sagittal alignment at last follow-up. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike studies on 1-level and 2-level ACDF, this study found that cervical spinal alignment was not associated with ASD development after 3-level ACDF. ASD development also had no impact on clinical outcomes at 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-nonrandomized cohort study.

Measurement properties of Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Pain catastrophizing impacts symptoms and outcomes for knee osteoarthritis (OA). We evaluated the internal consistency, content, construct and structure validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in patients with knee OA. METHODS: We evaluated content validity of PCS via cognitive interviews. We then recruited patients with knee OA enlisted for knee replacement (KR) surgery in a Singapore tertiary referral hospital for cross-sectional validation evaluation of PCS. Data was collected 2 weeks prior to KR. Analyses was guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) framework for internal consistency, construct validity and structure validity. RESULTS: Adequate content validity was confirmed from 10 patients in cognitive interviews. 675 (70.4% female, mean (standard deviation, SD) age = 65.52 (6.84) years) were included (91.7% total KR, 8.3% unicompartmental KR) in the cross-sectional study. The mean (SD) PCS score was 12.65 (10.55), with 0.14% and 8.63% ceiling and floor effects, respectively. PCS demonstrates high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). Construct validity was demonstrated by fulfilment of seven out of seven (100%) a priori hypotheses. PCS was strongly correlated with anxiety and depression, and moderately correlated with physical functioning and mental health domains of the short form 36 health survey (SF-36). Sensitivity analyses between Chinese and non-Chinese subgroups are generally consistent. From confirmatory factor analysis, the PCS model showed good fit for a second-order, three-factor structure (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.950, SRMR = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports internal consistency, construct validity and structural validity of PCS as a measure of pain catastrophizing in knee OA patients. Key points • The PCS is validated for measuring pain catastrophizing in knee OA patients, for evaluation of possible link to post-KR surgery satisfaction outcomes and other purposes.

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Scores after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in an Asian Population: A 2-Year Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aims to analyze the relationship between body mass index (BMI) subjective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The prevalence of cervical spondylosis and ACDF in expected to continue rising among the aging population of Asia. Moreover, the prevalence of obesity is also increasing. However, limited information is available about the mechanism by which BMI affects PRO after ACDF. METHODS: Total 878 patients underwent ACDF between 2000 and 2015. After excluding patients with previous cervical instrumentation, >2 levels fused, missing BMI measurement, or neoplastic/trauma indication for surgery, 535 patients were included. The PRO measures of the Neck Disability Index, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for Neck Pain, NPRS for Limb Pain, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Neurogenic Symptom Score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score were used. Patients were grouped based on their preoperative BMI, as per the World Health Organization guidelines for Asian populations. PRO scores were collected preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the relationship of BMI category with the individual score, accounting for several factors that are likely to affect the outcomes. RESULTS: Total 19 (3.4%) were underweight, 155 (28.0%) were normal weight, 112 (20.3%) were overweight, and 267 (48.3%) were obese. Patients across all BMI categories experienced significant and similar improvements in their postoperative PRO scores. There were no significant differences in the preoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 2-year postoperative PRO scores of the groups. Rate of reoperation was highest in patients with grade II obesity at 8.07%; however, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the BMI, all patients exhibited similar satisfactory outcomes following ACDF. The results support surgery in all subgroups of patients with symptomatic nerve compression in the cervical spine.

Women Do Not Have Poorer Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing lumbar spine surgery report greater preoperative pain and disability and have less improvement after surgery. There is a paucity of literature on sex-related differences after minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) surgery. We aim to determine whether sex influences outcome after MIS TLIF at 5-year midterm follow-up. METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data for 907 patients who underwent MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2004 to 2013 were reviewed. Of these, 296 patients (94 males and 202 females) were reviewed at 5-year follow-up. All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 5 years. Data recorded included patient demographics, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental component scores (SF-36 PCS and MCS), and the North American Spine Society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument. RESULTS: Females who underwent MIS TLIF were generally younger (females, 52.2 years; males, 56.1 years; P = .04). Females had significantly poorer preoperative ODI (females, 49.5; males, 41.5; P < .001) and SF-36 PCS (females, 31.9; males, 35.6; P < .01) and MCS (females, 44.9; males, 49.2; P < .01) scores. At 2-year and 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in ODI, SF-36, and pain scores between sexes. Both groups reported similar proportions that returned to work and returned to function. There were no differences in proportion of patients who were satisfied or had their expectations fulfilled. CONCLUSIONS: Women who undergo MIS TLIF have poorer preoperative function and quality of life than men. However, women demonstrated greater improvement after surgery, attaining similar clinical outcomes at 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A comparison of contiguous two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a structural allograft versus a Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: the results of a three-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Allografts and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are the two most commonly used materials in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, their effectiveness in two-level ACDF remains controversial. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level ACDF with plate fixation using either a structural allograft or a PEEK cage. METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, 88 consecutive patients underwent two-level ACDF, of whom 53 received an allograft and 35 patients received a PEEK cage. All PEEK cages were filled with local autografts. All clinical outcomes were prospectively collected before and six months and two years after surgery. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using a visual analogue scale for neck pain and limb pain, the Neck Pain and Disability Score, the Neck Disability Index, the Neurogenic Symptom Score, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Radiological outcomes were assessed preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: A preoperative comparison revealed no difference between the two patient groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, preoperative symptoms, operation level, or follow-up (mean = 42.8 months). No differences in the improvements in clinical outcomes were observed between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in mean disc height, segmental height, and segmental lordosis postoperatively. The fusion rate for the PEEK cage was 100% at both levels, while the fusion rate for the allograft group was 98.1% at the cephalad level and 94.2% at the caudad level (p > 0.05). Subsidence at the cephalad level occurred in 22.9% (8/35) of segments in the PEEK group and 7.7% (4/52) of segments in the allograft group (p = 0.057). At the caudal level, a higher incidence of cage subsidence was noted in the PEEK group than in the allograft group [37.1% (13/35) versus 15.4% (8/52)] (p = 0.02). Overall, subsidence was noted in 30% (21/70) of the PEEK group and in 11% (12/104) of the allograft group (p <  0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PEEK cages resulted in a higher rate of subsidence in two-level ACDF than the use of allografts. Two-level ACDF using either allografts or PEEK cages resulted in similar clinical outcomes, radiological improvements in alignment and fusion rates.

Predictors of Outcomes After Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Multivariate Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study that was carried out using prospectively collected registry data. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Proper patient selection is paramount to achieving good surgical results. Identifying predictors of outcomes may aid surgical decision-making and facilitate counseling of patients to manage expectations. METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data of 104 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Outcomes assessed at 2 years were the presence of residual neck pain/arm pain (AP), and attainment of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Physical Component Score (PCS) of SF-36, as well as patient satisfaction, fulfilment of expectations, willingness to undergo same surgery again, return to work (RTW), and return to function (RTF). Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariate stepwise logistical regression were performed to identify independent predictors of each outcome using 22 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative disease state. RESULTS: Lower preoperative NDI was predictive of the absence of residual neck pain/AP at 2 years. Higher preoperative JOA score was predictive of MCID attainment for PCS, satisfaction, expectation fulfilment, willingness to undergo the same surgery for same condition, and RTF. Poorer preoperative scores of NDI, JOA, and PCS were predictors of attaining MCID of the respective scores. Older patients were less likely to attain MCID for JOA. Higher preoperative AP was a risk factor for unsuccessful RTW. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the preoperative JOA score was the best predictor of outcomes after ACDF. A preoperative JOA cutoff value of 9.25-10.25 predicted satisfaction, expectation fulfilment, willingness to undergo same surgery, and RTF with at least 70% sensitivity and 50% specificity. These findings may aid surgeons in identifying patients at risk of a poor outcome and guide preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations of the surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty are not adversely affected by body mass index.

AIM: To study the effect of obesity on clinical and radiographic outcomes of computer-navigated knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 117 patients underwent primary computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Eight were lost to follow-up and 8 had incomplete data. RESULTS: Eighty-four (83.2%) female, 17 (16.8%) male patients age 65.3 ±â€¯6.9 years with a pre-operative BMI 27.2 ±â€¯4.1 (18.6-40.0) kg/m2, 7.3 ±â€¯0.98 years follow-up. Forty-two (41.6%) had a BMI>27.5 kg/m2 indicative of obesity in Singapore. Post-operative radiographic alignment, 2-year Oxford knee scores and ROM were not significantly associated with BMI. CONCLUSION: BMI is not a determinant of functional scores when computer navigation is used.

No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a known predictor of negative outcomes in spinal surgery. However, its effect on the functional outcomes and revision rates after ADR is not well-documented. This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a major tertiary center. The objective was to elucidate the impact of smoking on functional outcomes in cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR). METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical ADR for myelopathy or radiculopathy from 2004 to 2015 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included in the study. Patient function was assessed using Short Form-36 (SF-36), American Association of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) cervical spine, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Incidence of further surgery on affected and adjacent segments was analyzed as well. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included in the study, consisting of 117 nonsmokers and 20 smokers. There were 60 patients who presented with myelopathy and 77 with radiculopathy. The mean age of smokers was 42.6 years, compared with 46.4 years in the nonsmoker group (P < .01). Statistical improvement was noted in postoperative range of motion, as well as AAOS, SF-36, and JOA scores in both groups, with no difference between groups at 2 years of follow-up. A total of 84.2% of nonsmokers and 87.5% of smokers reported as surgery having met their expectations. A total of 5 of 117 nonsmokers (5.1%) and 4 of 20 smokers (20%) needed revision surgery (P = .018). Three of the 4 smokers who required surgery for adjacent or multisegment disease, whereas only 2 of the nonsmokers needed an operation for adjacent segment disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicates that there is no difference in functional outcome or patient satisfaction between smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers have a higher chance of revision surgery after an artificial disc replacement compared with nonsmokers at 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The Association Between Psychological Resilience and Physical Function Among Older Adults With Hip Fracture Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations of prefracture psychological resilience and prefracture general mental health with physical function among older adults with hip fracture surgery. DESIGN: Single-center observational study. INTERVENTION: None. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥50 years who underwent first hip fracture surgery between January 2017 and December 2017 (N = 152). METHODS: We used data collected prospectively from the hospital's hip fracture registry. We performed generalized estimating equations to examine the associations of prefracture psychological resilience (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) and prefracture general mental health (Short Form-36 mental health subscale) with physical function (Short Form-36 physical functioning subscale) at 4 time points-prefracture (based on recall), and 1.5, 3, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Prefracture psychological resilience had an association with physical function; a 1-unit increase in psychological resilience score was associated with 1.15 units [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71, 1.59] higher physical function score across 4 time points. In contrast, the association between general mental health and physical function varied over time; a 1-unit increase in general mental health score was associated with 0.42 units (95% CI 0.18, 0.66) higher physical function score at prefracture, 0.02 units (95% CI -0.18, 0.22) lower at 1.5 months, 0.23 units (95% CI -0.03, 0.49) higher at 3 months, and 0.39 units (95% CI 0.09, 0.68) higher at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Psychological resilience is associated with physical function among older adults with hip fracture surgery, independent from general mental health. Our findings suggest the potential for interventions targeting psychological resilience for these patients and call for more studies on psychological factors affecting physical function recovery after hip fracture surgery.