Clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis is the single most common cause of pain and disability in older adults. This review addresses the question of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, DARE, HTA and NHS EED databases were searched from inception to 02 May 2020. Search terms related to the clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions were used. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and key data were extracted. Random effect meta-analysis was conducted for pain, physical function and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: In total, 1467 studies were identified. Of these, 26 studies were included; methodological quality of most studies was adequate. Physiotherapy interventions were more effective than control for function, SMD - 0.166 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) - 0.420 to 0.088.] and ROM, SMD - 0.219 [95% CI - 0.465 to 0.028] for a follow-up of 2 or 3 months. Patients in the intervention group showed improvement in pain at 12-13 weeks, SMD - 0.175 [95% CI - 0.416 to 0.067]. No evidence on the pooled estimate of cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions was found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that has examined the clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following TKR. The findings of this review suggest that physiotherapy interventions were effective for improving physical function, ROM and pain in a short-term follow-up following TKR. Insufficient evidence exists to establish the benefit of physiotherapy in the long term for patient with TKR. Further study should examine the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions.

A qualitative study to explore the experiences of first contact physiotherapy practitioners in the NHS and their experiences of their first contact role.

PURPOSE: First Contact Practitioner (FCP) roles have been developed for health professionals with advanced practice skills to take on many of the musculoskeletal responsibilities currently carried out by general practitioners. FCP roles are new and still developing. Currently there is little research that has investigated the experiences of FCPs. This knowledge could help stakeholders and other clinicians gain an understanding into what makes a successful FCP role. The aim of this research was to explore the experiences of FCP working in North West England to gain insight into the first point of contact service, and their experiences of this developing full time FCP role. METHODS: A qualitative design using in-depth semi-structured, face-to-face interviews was undertaken to explore the experiences of FCP providing a first point of contact service. The study took place in an economically deprived and ethnically diverse location in North West England. FINDINGS: Ten FCPs were recruited, four were appointed from Band 6 posts to FCP training posts, 9 were male. The mean years qualified was 12.8. Five themes were identified: 1. 'It's the level of clinical complexity that you're dealing with', 2. FCP role - rewards and challenges, 3. Own wellbeing, 4. Professional development and education, 5. Realities of working in practice governed by business. CONCLUSION: FCP roles are an exciting development for people with MSK conditions, the physiotherapy profession, primary care providers and MSK physiotherapists. Mentorship support, workload and standards of training and practice are important when considering future expansion for the sustainability of these roles.

Patients' perceptions of rehabilitation in the community following hip fracture surgery. A qualitative thematic synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is one of the most common injuries in adults and can be a life changing experience for most. Many patients are ill-prepared for the changes in their normal daily activity that often occur in the following months after surgery. Community rehabilitation services vary, as management often focuses on acute over community services. This can impact on the patient's experience post hip fracture. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to understand and examine patients' perspective, views and experiences of physiotherapy rehabilitation in the community after hip fracture surgery, to improve future clinical practice for this population. DESIGN: A qualitative thematic synthesis was undertaken to investigate the aim. A content thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was carried out of the following databases: CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, Whiley Online, AMED & CINAHL. Further searches were performed in Google Scholar and backwards citation was used to search within included studies. STUDY SELECTION: A review of qualitative studies was performed using the SPIDER tool for identification of suitable studies and the CASP tool for analysis of quality. Studies were included if they were qualitative or part qualitative and involved patients' perceptions of rehabilitation after hip fracture following hospital discharge. RESULTS: Full text review was performed on 35 studies of which, 10 were identified as suitable. Three key themes were identified regarding experiences of rehabilitation within the community after hip fracture: Engaging in physical activity; Maintaining a positive perspective, and Support. CONCLUSION: Findings support the need for the patient perspective and experience to be considered in the improvement of hip fracture care pathways regarding rehabilitation in the community setting after hip fracture. This can help identify key areas of improvement in rehabilitation to enhance and improve the patient journey after hip fracture. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42018095434.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To examine the reported clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total hip replacement (THR). A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, DARE, HTA, and NHS EED databases were searched for studies on clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy in adults with THR published up to March 2020. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and key data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and a Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Data were summarised and combined using random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 1263 studies related to the aim of the review were identified, from which 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. These studies were conducted in Australia (n = 3), Brazil (n = 1), United States of America (USA) (n = 2), France (n = 2), Italy (n = 2), Germany (n = 3), Ireland (n = 1), Norway (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Japan (n = 1), Denmark (n = 1), and United Kingdom (UK) (n = 1). The duration of follow-up of the included studies was ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months. Physiotherapy interventions were found to be clinically effective for functional performance, hip muscle strength, pain, and range of motion flexion. From the National Health Service perspective, an accelerated physiotherapy programme following THR was cost-effective. The findings of the review suggest that physiotherapy interventions were clinically effective for people with THR. However, questions remain on the pooled cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions, and further research is required to examine this in patients with THR. Future studies are required to examine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions from patients, caregivers, and societal perspectives.Registration Prospero (ID: CRD42018096524).

Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in real-world settings. METHODS: A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database NHS EED) databases were searched for studies published in English language up to April 2018. Prospective and retrospective observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonate treatment among adults with osteoporosis were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS: The search yielded 540 published studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The mean age of patients included within the studies ranged between 53 to 80.8 years, and the follow-up varied from 3 months to 14 years. The mean persistence of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months, 1 year and 2 years ranged from 34.8% to 71.3%, 17.7% to 74.8% and 12.9% to 72.0%, respectively. The mean medication possession ratio ranged from 28.2% to 84.5%, 23% to 50%, 27.2% to 46% over 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. All studies included scored between 6 to 8 out of 9 on the NOS. The determinants of adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates included geographic residence, marital status, tobacco use, educational status, income, hospitalisation, medication type and dosing frequency. CONCLUSIONS: While a number of studies reported high levels of persistence and adherence, the findings of this review suggest that patient persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates medications was poor and reduced notably over time. Overall, adherence was suboptimal. To maximise adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates, it is important to consider possible determinants, including characteristics of the patients.

Exploring the disclosure decisions made by physiotherapists with a specific learning difficulty.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the disclosure decisions made in the workplace by physiotherapy staff with a specific learning difficulty (SpLD). DESIGN & SETTING: An exploratory qualitative design was used, which was informed by the social model of disability. The research was undertaken in North West England. It is presented according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of eight physiotherapists recognised as having a SpLD were recruited. All participants had studied on one of two programmes at a university in England between 2004-2012. Their NHS workplace experience was from across the UK. DATA GENERATION: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken within the university setting or via telephone. Interviews lasted 40 to 70minutes and were digitally recorded. An interview guide was used to direct the interview. DATA ANALYSIS: Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four participants were female. The mean number of years qualified as a physiotherapist was 4.5years (SD=2.27). Three themes were identified: 'Disclosing during the workplace application'; 'Positive about disabled people scheme'; 'Disclosing in the workplace'. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of dyslexia is a selective process and is a central dilemma in the lives of individuals who have a concealable stigmatised identity. As a consequence, physiotherapy staff with dyslexia may choose to conceal their disability and not disclose to their employer. In order for staff with dyslexia to get the support they need in the workplace, disclosure is recommended. A number of recommendations have been made to facilitate the disclosure process.