Label-free nLC-MS/MS proteomic analysis reveals significant differences in the proteome between colorectal cancer tissues and normal colon mucosa.

Despite the discovery of numerous driving and passenger genes that play key roles in cancer characteristics, progress in cancer treatment has not been satisfactory. This is mainly because conventional therapies are neither selective nor targeted. Another important reason is that cancer cells rapidly develop resistance to chemotherapeutic agents due to excessive accumulation of mutations and/or epigenetic changes. In light of this, we believe that the discovery of new targets and key genes/proteins could improve treatment options. In this study, tissue samples (tumor and normal mucosa) were first collected from the colon or rectum by right or left hemicolectomy. Proteomic analysis was then performed using the label-free nLC-MS/MS method. We determined 77 proteins with statistically significant differences in expression levels between cancerous and normal mucosa. While the expression of 76 proteins was decreased in cancer tissues, only one protein (RNA-binding motif protein_X chromosome-RBMX) was increased in colorectal cancer tissues. The bioinformatics portal Metascape was used to determine the biological processes involved. 77 proteins with significantly different expression between cancerous and normal tissues were compared with the UALCAN platform using data from the Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). The results for 45 of the 77 proteins clearly matched the CPTAC dataset. Western blot studies confirmed that RBMX protein (critical for gene transcription and alternative splicing of various pre-mRNAs) was increased 2.04-fold, while decorin protein (a matrix proteoglycan with tumor suppressor functions) was dramatically decreased by about 6.04-fold in tumor samples compared with normal mucosa.

Molecular Pathways, Targeted Therapies, and Proteomic Investigations of Colorectal Cancer.

According to the GLOBOCAN 2020 data, colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. The risk factors for colorectal cancer include a diet abundant with fat, refined carbohydrates, animal protein, low fiber content, alcoholism, obesity, long-term cigarette smoking, low physical activity, and aging. Colorectal carcinomas are classified as adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, squamous cell, adenosquamous, spindle cell, and undifferentiated carcinomas. In addition, many variants of colorectal carcinomas have been recently distinguished based on histological, immunological, and molecular characteristics. Recently developed targeted molecules in conjunction with standard chemotherapeutics or immune checkpoint inhibitors provide promising treatment protocols for colorectal cancer. However, the benefit of targeted therapies is strictly dependent on the mutational status of signaling molecules (e.g., KRAS) or mismatch repair systems. Here it is aimed to provide a comprehensive view of colorectal cancer types, molecular pathways associated, recently developed targeted therapies, as well as proteomic investigations applied to colorectal cancer for the discovery of novel biomarkers and new targets for treatment protocols.

Heme-regulated inhibitor: an overlooked eIF2α kinase in cancer investigations.

Heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase is a serine-threonine kinase, controlling the initiation of protein synthesis via phosphorylating α subunit of eIF2 on serine 51 residue, mainly in response to heme deprivation in erythroid cells. However, recent studies showed that HRI is also activated by several diverse signals, causing dysregulations in intracellular homeostatic mechanisms in non-erythroid cells. For instance, it was reported that the decrease in protein synthesis upon the 26S proteasomal inhibition by MG132 or bortezomib is mediated by increased eIF2α phosphorylation in an HRI-dependent manner in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. The increase in eIF2α phosphorylation level through the activation of HRI upon 26S proteasomal inhibition is believed to protect cells against the buildup of misfolded and ubiquitinated proteins, having the potential to trigger the apoptotic response. In contrast, prolonged and sustained HRI-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation can induce cell death, which may involve ATF4 and CHOP expression. Altogether, these studies suggest that HRI-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation may be cytoprotective or cytotoxic depending on the cells, type, and duration of pharmacological agents used. It is thus hypothesized that both HRI activators, inducing eIF2α phosphorylation or HRI inhibitors causing disturbances in eIF2α phosphorylation, may be effective as novel strategies in cancer treatment if the balance in eIF2α phosphorylation is shifted in favor of autophagic or apoptotic response in cancer cells. It is here aimed to review the role of HRI in various biological mechanisms as well as the therapeutic potentials of recently developed HRI activators and inhibitors, targeting eIF2α phosphorylation in cancer cells.

Molecular analysis of cell survival and death pathways in the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib-resistant PC3 prostate cancer cell line.

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is an important protein quality control system involved in intracellular homeostasis. To achieve intracellular homeostasis, proteins that are misfolded as a result of translational errors or genetic mutations must be eliminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In our previous publications, we determined that 4T1 breast and B16F10 melanoma cancer cells have differential levels of resistance to proteasome inhibitors. Again, in the previous studies, we reported that 4T1 cell cultures, despite being p53-mutant, underwent apoptosis as a result of bortezomib treatment. The first goal of this study was to verify the resistance levels of parental and resistant PC3 prostate cancer cells to bortezomib using WST-1 test. As a result of treatment with different bortezomib concentrations for 48 h, the IC50 value of the parental cells was determined as 32.8 nM and that of the resistant cells was determined as 346 nM. This result showed that the resistant cells were at least 10.5 times more resistant. In addition, to determine whether the resistance gained was reversible or not, the cells were passaged in a medium without bortezomib for one month. The IC50 value determination by WST-1 test showed that the resistant PC3 cells gained an irreversible bortezomib resistance phenotype. The results of the 3D spheroid experiment showed that the 3D spheroid diameter of resistant cells was significantly higher than that of the parental cells. The studies conducted with Western blot showed that ERK1 MAPK T202 phosphorylation and the conversion of autophagy marker LC3-I to LC3-II were significantly increased in parental cells as compared to the resistant cells. Finally, the results showed that while both maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) inhibitor OTSSP167 and Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM (also an inhibitor of the expression of antiapoptotic protein GRP78) are promising agents for cancer cells resistant to the proteasome inhibitors, CDK2 inhibitor CVT-313 was found ineffective in both parental and the resistant cells.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Epigenetic Modifications in Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is involved in almost all cellular processes (cell cycle, gene transcription and translation, cell survival and apoptosis, cell metabolism and protein quality control) mainly through the specific degradation of the majority of intracellular proteins (>80%) or partial processing of transcription factors (e.g., NF-κB). A growing amount of evidence now indicates that epigenetic changes are also regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Recent studies indicate that epigenetic regulations are equally crucial for almost all biological processes as well as for pathological conditions such as tumorigenesis, as compared to non-epigenetic control mechanisms (i.e., genetic alterations or classical signal transduction pathways). OBJECTIVE: Here, we reviewed the recent work highlighting the interaction of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway components (e.g., ubiquitin, E1, E2 and E3 enzymes and 26S proteasome) with epigenetic regulators (histone deacetylases, histone acetyltransferases and DNA methyltransferases). RESULTS: Alterations in the regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway have been discovered in many pathological conditions. For example, a 2- to 32-fold increase in proteasomal activity and/or subunits has been noted in primary breast cancer cells. Although proteasome inhibitors have been successfully applied in the treatment of hematological malignancies (e.g., multiple myeloma), the clinical efficacy of the proteasomal inhibition is limited in solid cancers. Interestingly, recent studies show that the ubiquitin-proteasome and epigenetic pathways intersect in a number of ways through the regulation of epigenetic marks (i.e., acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation). CONCLUSION: It is therefore believed that novel treatment strategies involving new generation ubiquitinproteasome pathway inhibitors combined with DNA methyltransferase, histone deacetylase or histone acetyltransferase inhibitors may produce more effective results with fewer adverse effects in cancer treatment as compared to standard chemotherapeutics in hematological as well as solid cancers.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Resistance Mechanisms Developed Against the Proteasomal Inhibitors in Cancer Cells.

BACKGROUND: The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is crucial for all cellular processes and is, therefore, a critical target for the investigation and development of novel strategies for cancer treatment. In addition, approximately 30% of newly synthesized proteins never attain their final conformations due to translational errors or defects in post-translational modifications; therefore, they are also rapidly eliminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. OBJECTIVE: Here, an effort was made to outline the recent findings deciphering the new molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as well as the resistance mechanisms developed against proteasome inhibitors in cell culture experiments and in the clinical trials. RESULTS: Since cancer cells have higher proliferation rates and are more prone to translational errors, they require the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for selective advantage and sustained proliferation. Therefore, drugs targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway are promising agents for the treatment of both hematological and solid cancers. CONCLUSION: A number of proteasome inhibitors are approved and used for the treatment of advanced and relapsed multiple myeloma. Unfortunately, drug resistance mechanisms may develop very fast within days of the start of the proteasome inhibitor-treatment either due to the inherent or acquired resistance mechanisms under selective drug pressure. However, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms leading to the proteasome inhibitor-resistance will eventually help the design and development of novel strategies involving new drugs and/or drug combinations for the treatment of a number of cancers.

An investigation of the mechanisms underlying the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib resistance in PC3 prostate cancer cell line.

The phenomenon of acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a long-standing conundrum in cancer treatment. To help delineate drug resistance mechanisms and pave the way for the development of novel strategies, we generated a PC3 prostate cancer cell line resistant to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for the first time. The resistant cells were found to have an IC50 value of 359.6 nM, whereas the IC50 value of parental cells was 82.6 nM after 24 h of treatment with varying doses of bortezomib. The resistant cells were also partly cross-resistant to the novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib; however, they were not resistant to widely used chemotherapeutic agent vincristine sulfate, indicating that enhanced cellular drug efflux via the multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters is not the molecular basis of the resistance. Since both bortezomib and carfilzomib target and inhibit the chymotrypsin-related activity residing in the ß5 subunit of the proteasome (PSMB5), we next examined its expression and found surprisingly no significant alteration in the expression profile of the mature form. However, a significant increase in the accumulation of the precursor form of PSMB5 in response to 100 nM bortezomib was observed in the parental cells without a significant accumulation in the resistant cells. The results presented here thus suggest that the molecular mechanisms causing resistance to proteasome inhibitors need to be examined in-depth to overcome the resistance to ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors in cancer treatment.

A novel and effective inhibitor combination involving bortezomib and OTSSP167 for breast cancer cells in light of label-free proteomic analysis.

PURPOSE: The 26S proteasome plays important roles in many intracellular processes and is therefore a critical intracellular cellular target for anticancer treatments. The primary aim of the current study was to identify critical proteins that may play roles in opposing the antisurvival effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib together with the calcium-chelator BAPTA-AM in cancer cells using label-free LC-MS/MS. In addition, based on the results of the proteomic technique, a novel and more effective inhibitor combination involving bortezomib as well as OTSSP167 was developed for breast cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using label-free LC-MS/MS, it was found that expressions of 1266 proteins were significantly changed between the experimental groups. Among these proteins were cell division cycle 5-like (Cdc5L) and drebrin-like (DBNL). We then hypothesized that inhibition of the activities of these two proteins may lead to more effective anticancer inhibitor combinations in the presence of proteasomal inhibition. In fact, as presented in the current study, Cdc5L phosphorylation inhibitor CVT-313 and DBNL phosphorylation inhibitor OTSSP167 were highly cytotoxic in 4T1 breast cancer cells and their IC50 values were 20.1 and 43 nM, respectively. Under the same experimental conditions, the IC50 value of BAPTA-AM was found 19.9 µM. Using WST 1 cytotoxicity assay, it was determined that 10 nM bortezomib + 10 nM CVT-313 was more effective than the control, the single treatments, or than 5 nM bortezomib + 5 nM CVT-313. Similarly, 10 nM bortezomib + 10 nM OTSSP167 was more cytotoxic than the control, the monotherapies, 5 nM bortezomib + 5 nM OTSSP167, or than 5 nM bortezomib + 10 nM OTSSP167, indicating that bortezomib + OTSSP167 was also more effective than bortezomib + CVT-313 in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the 3D spheroid model proved that bortezomib + OTSSP167 was more effective than the monotherapies as well as bortezomib + CVT-313 and bortezomib + BAPTA-AM combinations. Finally, the effect of bortezomib + OTSSP167 combination was tested on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, and it similarly determined that 20 nM bortezomib +40 nM OTSSP167 combination completely blocked the formation of 3D spheroids. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, the results presented here indicate that bortezomib + OTSSP167 is a novel and effective combination and may be tested further for cancer treatment in vivo and in clinical settings.

Correction to: Secretomes reveal several novel proteins as well as TGF-ß1 as the top upstream regulator of metastatic process in breast cancer.

In the original publication of the article, Acknowledgement section was missed out and Table 1 was published incompletely. The Acknowledgment and complete table 1 are given in this correction. The original article has been corrected.

Secretomes reveal several novel proteins as well as TGF-ß1 as the top upstream regulator of metastatic process in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer is resistant to many conventional treatments and novel therapeutic targets are needed. We previously isolated subsets of 4T1 murine breast cancer cells which metastasized to liver (4TLM), brain (4TBM), and heart (4THM). Among these cells, 4TLM is the most aggressive one, demonstrating mesenchymal phenotype. Here we compared secreted proteins from 4TLM, 4TBM, and 4THM cells and compared with that of hardly metastatic 67NR cells to detect differentially secreted factors involved in organ-specific metastasis. METHOD AND RESULTS: Label-free LC-MS/MS proteomic technique was used to detect the differentially secreted proteins. Eighty-five of over 500 secreted proteins were significantly altered in metastatic breast cancer cells. Differential expression of several proteins such as fibulin-4, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1, TGF-ß1 MMP-3, MMP-9, and Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin were further verified using ELISA or Western blotting. Many of these identified proteins were also present in human metastatic breast carcinomas. Annexin A1 and A5, laminin beta 1, Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB were commonly found at least in three out of six studies examined here. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showed that proteins differentially secreted from metastatic cells are involved primarily in carcinogenesis and TGF-ß1 is the top upstream regulator in all metastatic cells. CONCLUSIONS: Cells metastasized to different organs displayed significant differences in several of secreted proteins. Proteins differentially altered were fibronectin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7, and Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1. On the other hand, many exosomal proteins were also common to all metastatic cells, demonstrating involvement of key universal factors in distant metastatic process.

Differential effects of p38 MAP kinase inhibitors SB203580 and SB202190 on growth and migration of human MDA-MB-231 cancer cell line.

p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) belongs to the MAPK superfamily, phosphorylating serine and/or threonine residues of the target proteins. The activation of p38 MAPK leads to cell growth, differentiation, inflammation, survival or apoptosis. In this study, we tested the effect of two highly specific and potent inhibitors of p38 MAPK (namely, SB203580 and SB202190) on human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 to elucidate the controversial role of p38 MAPK on cell proliferation and/or cell migration/metastasis further. It was determined that the IC50 value of SB203580 was 85.1 µM, while that of SB202190 was 46.6 µM, suggesting that SB202190 is slightly more effective than SB203580. To verify the effect of each inhibitor on cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, the cells were treated with various doses of SB203580 and SB202190 and examined using iCELLigence system. No significant effect of 1 and 5 µM of both inhibitors were seen on cell proliferation as compared to the DMSO-treated control cells for up to 96 h. On the other hand, both SB203580 and SB202190 significantly prevented cell proliferation at a concentration of 50 µM. SB202190 was again more effective than SB203580. Afterwards, we tested the effect of each inhibitor on cell migration using wound assay. Both SB203580 and SB202190 significantly reduced cell migration in a time-dependent manner at a concentration of 50 µM. However, interestingly it was observed that a low and noncytotoxic dose of 5 µM of SB203580 and SB202190 also did cause significant cell migration inhibition at 48 h of the treatment, corroborating the fact that p38 MAPK pathway has a critical role in cell migration/metastasis. Then, we tested whether each p38 MAPK inhibitor has any effect on cell adhesion during a treatment period of 3 h using iCELLigence system. A concentration of only 50 µM of SB202190 reduced cell adhesion for about 1.5 h (p < 0.001); after that period of time, cell adhesion in 50 µM SB202190-treated cells returned to the level of the control cells. To determine the mechanism of growth and cell migration inhibitory effects of p38 MAPK inhibitors, the activation/inactivation of various proteins and enzymes was subsequently analyzed by PathScan® Intracellular Signaling Array kit. The ERK1/2 phosphorylation level was not modified by low concentrations (1 or 5 µM) of SB202190 and SB203580; while a high concentration (50 µM) of both inhibitors caused significant reductions in the ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In addition, it was determined that both p38 MAPK inhibitors caused significant increases on the Ser15 phosphorylation of mutant p53 in MDA-MB-231 under these experimental conditions; while SB202190 was more potent than SB203580.

A novel combination treatment for breast cancer cells involving BAPTA-AM and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.

Glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa/binding immunoglobulin protein (GRP78/BIP) is a well-known endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone protein regulating ER stress by facilitating protein folding, assembly and Ca2+ binding. GRP78 is also a member of the heat shock protein 70 gene family and induces tumor cell survival and resistance to chemotherapeutics. Bortezomib is a highly specific 26S proteasome inhibitor that has been approved as treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. The present study first examined the dose- and time-dependent effects of bortezomib on GRP78 expression levels in the highly metastatic mouse breast cancer 4T1 cell line using western blot analysis. The analysis results revealed that GRP78 levels were significantly increased by bortezomib at a dose as low as 10 nM. Time-dependent experiments indicated that the accumulation of GRP78 was initiated after a 24 h incubation period following the addition of 10 nM bortezomib. Subsequently, the present study determined the half maximal inhibitory concentration of intracellular calcium chelator BAPTA-AM (13.6 µM) on 4T1 cells. The combination effect of BAPTA-AM and bortezomib on the 4T1 cells was investigated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and WST-1 assays and an iCELLigence system. The results revealed that the combination of 10 nM bortezomib + 5 µM BAPTA-AM is more cytotoxic compared with monotherapies, including 10 nM bortezomib, 1 µM BAPTA-AM and 5 µM BAPTA-AM. In addition, the present results revealed that bortezomib + BAPTA-AM combination causes cell death through the induction of apoptosis. The present results also revealed that bortezomib + BAPTA-AM combination-induced apoptosis is associated with a clear increase in the phosphorylation of stress-activated protein kinase/Jun amino-terminal kinase SAPK/JNK. Overall, the present results suggest that bortezomib and BAPTA-AM combination therapy may be a novel therapeutic strategy for breast cancer treatment.

Bortezomib and etoposide combinations exert synergistic effects on the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3.

Novel treatment modalities are urgently required for androgen-independent prostate cancer. In order to develop an alternative treatment for prostate cancer, the cytotoxic effects of the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, either alone or in combination with the two commonly used chemotherapeutic agents irinotecan and etoposide, on the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3 were evaluated in the present study. The PC-3 cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and treated with various doses of bortezomib, irinotecan, etoposide or their combinations. The growth inhibitory and cytotoxic effects were determined by water-soluble tetrazolium (WST)-1 assay, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay or iCELLigence system. The combination index values were determined by the Chou-Talalay method. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of bortezomib on the PC-3 cell line was determined to be 53.4 nM by WST-1 assay, whereas the IC50 values of irinotecan and etoposide were determined to be 2.1 and 26.5 µM, respectively. These results suggest that the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is more potent, compared with irinotecan and etoposide, in the androgen-insensitive and tumor protein p53-null cell line PC-3. The combined effects of bortezomib+irinotecan and bortezomib+etoposide were also tested on PC-3 cells. The effect of bortezomib+irinotecan combination was not significantly different than that produced by either monotherapy, according to the results of iCELLigence system and MTT assay. However, 40 nM bortezomib+5 µM etoposide or 40 nM bortezomib+20 µM etoposide combinations were observed to be more effective than each drug tested alone. The results of the current study suggest that bortezomib and etoposide combination may be additionally evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

A proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer cell line.

The 26S proteasome is a proteolytic enzyme found in both cytoplasm and nucleus. In this study, we examined the differential expression of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib-induced proteins in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. It was found that GRP78 and TCEB2 were over-expressed in response to treatment with bortezomib for 24h. Next, we analyzed the expression of intracellular proteins in response to treatment with 100nM bortezomib for 24h by label-free LC-MS/MS. These analyses showed that Hsp70, the 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 and sequestosome 1 were increased at least 2 fold in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. The proteins identified by label-free LC-MS/MS were then analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Tool to determine biological networks affected by inhibition of the 26S proteasome. The analysis results showed that post-translational modifications, protein folding, DNA replication, energy production and nucleic acid metabolism were found to be among the top functions affected by the 26S proteasome inhibition. The biological network analysis indicated that ubiquitin may be the central regulator of the pathways modulated after bortezomib-treatment. Further investigation of the mechanism of the proteins modulated in response to the proteasomal inhibition may lead to the design of more effective and novel therapeutic strategies for cancer. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is approved and used for the treatment of human cancer (multiple myeloma), the mechanism of action is not entirely understood. A number of studies showed that proteasome inhibitors induced apoptosis through upregulation of tumor suppressor protein p53. However, the role of tumor suppressor protein p53 in bortezomib-induced apoptosis is controversial and not well-understood. The tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in at least 50% of human cancers and is strongly induced by proteasomal inhibition. Some also reported that the proteasome inhibitor can induce apoptosis in a p53-independent manner. Also, it is reported that Noxa, a target of p53, is induced in response to proteasomal inhibition in a p53-independent manner. However, we have also previously reported that neither Puma nor Noxa are induced by proteasomal inhibition in p53-null 4T1 breast cancer cells, which is commonly used for in vivo breast cancer tumor models. The current results provided additional targets of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and may therefore help in understanding the p53-independent mechanism of apoptosis induction by proteasome inhibitors. In addition, the results presented in this current study report for the first time that proteasomal subunit Psmd14, anti-apoptotic GRP78, anti apoptotic protein Card10, Dffb, Traf3 and Trp53bp2 are regulated and overexpressed in response to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies targeting these anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic proteins as well as inhibiting the proteasome simultaneously may be more effective against cancer cells. The proteins identified here present new avenues for the development of anti-cancer drugs.

Additive enhancement of apoptosis by TRAIL and fenretinide in metastatic breast cancer cells in vitro.

Successful management of metastatic breast cancer still needs better chemotherapeutic approaches. The combination of fenretinide (4-HPR), a synthetic retinoid inducing apoptosis by ROS generation, and TRAIL, a cell death ligand inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis, might result in more powerful cytotoxic activity. We therefore investigated the cytotoxic activity and resulting cell death mode of this combination in MDA-MB-231 cell line as a representative of metastatic state. Cytotoxicity was assessed by the ATP viability assay while the mode of cell death was determined both morphologically using fluorescence microscopy and biochemically using Western blotting and ELISA. The combination resulted in an additive cytotoxic effect at the doses used. Fragmented and/or pyknotic nuclei, which is a feature of apoptosis, were observed after treatment with fenretinide or TRAIL. However, the combinatorial treatment further increased apoptotic figures. Confirming apoptosis, active caspase-3 and cleaved PARP were increased by fenretinide or TRAIL in both western blotting and ELISA. Again, apoptosis was further increased by the combination. The combination warrants further studies due to its superior cytotoxic activity in the metastatic setting of breast cancer.

Data for a proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib.

This data article contains data related to the research article entitled, "A proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer cell line" by Yerlikaya et al. [1]. The research article presented 2-DE and nLC-MS/MS based proteomic analysis of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib-induced changes in the expression of cellular proteins. The report showed that GRP78 and TCEB2 were over-expressed in response to treatment with bortezomib for 24 h. In addition, the report demonstrated that Hsp70, the 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 and sequestosome 1 were increased at least 2 fold in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. The data here show for the first time the increased expressions of Card10, Dffb, Traf3 and Trp53bp2 in response to inhibition of the 26S proteasome. The information presented here also shows that both Traf1 and Xiap (a member of IAPs) are also downregulated simultaneously upon proteasomal inhibition. The increases in the level of Card10 and Trp53bp2 proteins were verified by Western blot analysis in response to varying concentrations of bortezomib for 24 h.

Anticancer agent ukrain and bortezomib combination is synergistic in 4T1 breast cancer cells.

The identification and in-depth understanding of intracellular signalling pathways led to the synthesis and discovery of many agents targeting cancer cells. In this study, we investigated for the first time the effect of anticancer agent ukrain as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, quercetin and bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer and B16F10 melanoma cells. It was found that ukrain is cytotoxic and apoptotic in 4T1 breast carcinoma and B16F10 melanoma cells when given alone. The IC50 value of ukrain in 4T1 cells was found as 40 ± 6.8 µM and that in B16F10 cells as 76 ± 10 µM. It was then found that apoptosis can be induced in 4T1 breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner in response to ukrain treatment, based on DNA fragmentation evidence. The induction of apoptosis was corroborated by the analysis of cleavage products of caspase-3 in 4T1 cells using Western blot technique. When ukrain was tested in combination with cisplatin and etoposide, no significant enhancement of cytotoxicity was detected as compared with single agent treatments. Similarly, 5-fluorouracil and quercetin also did not potentiate the cytotoxic effects of ukrain in 4T1 cells. Finally, we examined the effect of various concentrations of ukrain in combination with 10 nM bortezomib in 4T1 cells. Determination of combination index values showed that bortezomib potentiated the effect of ukrain. And the combination was found to cause synergistic cell death. The lowest combination index detected was 0.57 which was obtained when the cells were treated with 10 nM bortezomib + 100 µM ukrain. Likewise, when cells were treated with different doses of bortezomib in the presence of 25 µM ukrain, synergism was similarly detected between the two drugs in a dose-dependent manner. Altogether, the results presented here suggest that the combination of ukrain + bortezomib may be further evaluated and tested in clinical settings.

Effect of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and 5­fluorouracil on 4T1 breast cancer cells.

Bortezomib is a highly selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. It has been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. A number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of bortezomib either alone or in combination with several cytotoxic agents and radiation. In the current study, the efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination with cisplatin and 5­fluorouracil was evaluated in 4T1 breast cancer cells, a highly metastatic murine cancer cell line. Using MTT assay, IC50 values of cisplatin and 5­fluorouracil were determined to be 14.2 and 8.9 µM for cisplatin and 5­fluorouracil, respectively. The effects of different concentrations of cisplatin and 5­fluorouracil in combination with two different concentrations of bortezomib were examined in the 4T1 cells. Statistically significant differences were found when 1 or 5 µM cisplatin was combined with 10 or 50 nM bortezomib. Similarly, 1 µM 5­fluorouracil or 5 µM 5­fluorouracil in combination with 10 nM bortezomib caused significant cell death as compared to treatment with single agents. However, 1 or 5 µM 5­fluorouracil did not potentiate the effects of higher concentrations of bortezomib (50 nM). The effect of the combination of cisplatin, 5­fluorouracil and bortezomib was determined by soft agar assay. It was confirmed that a combination of cisplatin and bortezomib was more effective than each drug as a monotherapy. Therefore, the combination of cisplatin and bortezomib should be tested further in clinical settings.

The significance of ubiquitin proteasome pathway in cancer development.

The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is the most significant intracellular proteolytic pathway. The target proteins are usually ubiquitinated prior to degradation by the proteasome; however, ubiquitin-independent targeting mechanisms have also been reported (e.g., the antizyme-mediated degradation of ornithine decarboxylase). Aberrations in the components of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway are commonly observed in many cancers, and uncontrolled growth of cancer cells can result either from stabilization of oncoproteins (e.g., c-jun) or increased degradation of tumor suppressor proteins (e.g., p53). In addition, due to the pleiotropic functions of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway in cells, there is great interest in developing inhibitors to specifically block this pathway for cancer treatment. This review summarizes the recent literature and several patented inventions on the ubiquitin proteasome pathway with respect to its role in cancer development and treatment.

Expression of heme oxygenase-1 in response to proteasomal inhibition.

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is an antioxidant, antiapoptotic and cytoprotective enzyme, catalysing the degradation of heme to carbon monoxide, biliverdin and ferrous iron. Recent studies indicated that expression of HO-1 is under the control of proapoptotic transcription factor p53 and antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2. Whether each of these transcription factors act independently or there is a cooperation between them in inducing HO-1 expression remains to be elucidated. In this study, we examined the expression of HO-1 in B16F10 melanoma and 4T1 breast cancer cells after cell exposure to proteasome inhibitors. We found that HO-1 protein level is increased by about 70% in p53-wt B16F10 cells in response to proteasome inhibitor MG132 after 6 h. Likewise, a 6.8 fold increase in HO-1 level was observed after cell exposure to the highly specific proteasome inhibitor bortezomib after 6 h of treatment in B16F10 cells. Whereas no induction of HO-1 was observed in p53-null 4T1 cells after treatment with bortezomib for 6 h. Next, we aligned HO-1 untranslated region with a consensus p53-responsive element. This bioinformatic analysis identified a p53-responsive element within the untranslated region of HO-1. Then, we examined HO-1 expression after a prolonged exposure to bortezomib in both B16F10 and 4T1 cell. These analyses similarly indicated that HO-1 is strongly induced in B16F10 cells in a dosedependent; contrary to our expectations, a strong induction of HO-1 is also observed in 4T1 cells. Therefore, it is concluded that HO-1 expression is under the control of p53 during early time points of proteasomal inhibition. However, during prolonged incubation with proteasome inhibitors, HO-1 expression can be induced in a p53-independent manner, suggesting participation of other protein(s) with longer half-lives.