Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 58(6): 1857-60, 1992 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1622261

ABSTRACT

API Listeria is a new 10-test strip for 24-h biochemical identification of Listeria isolates. With this commercial system, 85% of 646 Listeria strains, including atypical isolates selected for this study, were recognized at the species and subspecies level without a complementary test. A new test differentiates Listeria monocytogenes from L. innocua on the basis of the absence of arylamidase from the former. With this system, 97.7% (252 of 258) of the L. monocytogenes strains tested were correctly identified and differentiated from 99.4% (175 of 176) of the L. innocua strains also tested. Gram-positive bacteria other than Listeria spp. gave quite different biochemical patterns. This system considerably reduced the time needed for conventional identification, since results were available within 18 to 24 h.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques , Listeria/isolation & purification , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Listeria/classification , Listeria/metabolism , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeria monocytogenes/metabolism , Listeriosis/diagnosis , Time Factors
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 58(6): 2011-5, 1992 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1622280

ABSTRACT

The MICRO-ID LISTERIA system, designed to identify Listeria isolates to species level within 24 h, was compared with conventional biochemical identification. MICRO-ID LISTERIA used in combination with the CAMP test correctly identified 409 (98.8%) of 414 strains isolated from human, animal, food, and environmental sources belonging to the seven species currently defined within the genus Listeria. The kit was easy to use and simple to interpret. However, 8 of the 15 tests (i.e., phenylalanine deaminase, hydrogen sulfide, indole, ornithine decarboxylase, lysine decarboxylase, malonate, urease, and o-nitrophenyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside) were considered superfluous for the differentiation of Listeria spp. The CAMP test was indispensable when using the MICRO-ID LISTERIA system, in particular to differentiate CAMP test-positive L. monocytogenes from the nonhemolytic, rhamnose-positive L. innocua. The hemolytic L. seeligeri and L. ivanovii strains and the nonhemolytic, non-rhamnose-acidifying L. welshimeri strains could also be differentiated from one another only on the basis of their CAMP test results. The very few strains of L. grayi and L. murrayi were easily differentiated from the other nonhemolytic species. Catalase-negative cocci should not be tested, because 12 out of 19 catalase-negative strains (all enterococci) in our test were misidentified as Listeria spp. The MICRO-ID LISTERIA system identified strains within 18 to 24 h and is thus less time-consuming than conventional tests. The system could, therefore, be used together with correctly done CAMP tests for the rapid identification of Listeria isolates, especially food and environmental isolates, for which rapid species differentiation is important.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques , Listeria/isolation & purification , Animals , Environmental Microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Food Microbiology , Humans , Listeria/classification , Listeria/metabolism , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...