Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 13(10): e0205529, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30300397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Hong Kong Government released a Reference Framework (RF-HT) for Hypertension Care for Adults in Primary Care Settings since 2010. No studies have evaluated its adoption by primary care physicians (PCPs) since its release. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the level of PCPs' adoption of the RF-HT and the potential barriers of its use in family practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study was conducted by a self-administered validated survey among all PCPs in Hong Kong through various means. METHODS: We assessed the level of and factors associated with its adoption by multivariate logistic regression modelling. RESULT: A total of 3,857 invitation episodes were sent to 2,297 PCPs in 2014-2015. We received 383 completed questionnaires. The average score of adoption was 3.43 out of 4.00, and 47.5% of PCPs highly adopted RF-HT in their daily consultations. Male practitioners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.290-0.948, p = 0.033) and PCPs of public sector (aOR = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.292-0.940, p = 0.030) were significantly less likely to adopt the RF-HT. PCPs with higher training completion or being academic fellow are more likely to adopt RF-HT than those who were "nil to basic training completion" (aOR = 0.479, 95% CI = 0.269-0.853, p = 0.012) or "higher trainee" (aOR = 0.302, 95% CI = 0.093-0.979, p = 0.046). Three most-supported suggestions on RF-HT improvement were simplification of RF-HT, provision of pocket version and promoting in patients. CONCLUSION: Among PCP respondents, the adoption level of the RF-HT was high. These findings also highlighted some factors associated with its adoption that could inform targeted interventions for enhancing its use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Hypertension/therapy , Physicians, Primary Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/methods
2.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 3165, 2017 06 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28600530

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer induces a substantial global burden. We examined its global incidence/mortality rates and their correlation with socioeconomic development (Human Development Index [HDI] and Gross Domestic Product [GDP] in 2000 as proxy measures). Data on age-standardized incidence/mortality rates in 2012 were retrieved from the GLOBOCAN database. Temporal patterns in 1998-2007 were assessed for 39 countries according to gender. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) of the incidence/mortality trends was evaluated using joinpoint regression analysis. The age-standardized incidence ranged between 0.8-8.9/100,000. When compared among countries, Brazil (AAPC = 10.4, 95%C.I. = 0.8,21) and France (AAPC = 4.7, 95%C.I. = 3.6,5.9) reported the highest incidence rise in men. The greatest increase in women was reported in Thailand (AAPC = 7, 95%C.I. = 2.1,12.1) and Ecuador (AAPC = 4.3, 95%C.I. = 1.3,7.3). For mortality, the Philippines (APCC = 4.3, 95%C.I. = 2,6.6) and Croatia (AAPC = 2, 95% C.I. = 0,3.9) reported the biggest increase among men. The Philippines (AAPC = 5.8, 95% C.I. 4.5,7.2) and Slovakia (AAPC = 3.1, 95% C.I. 0.9,5.3) showed the most prominent rise among women. Its incidence was positively correlated with HDI (men: r = 0.66; women: r = 0.70) and GDP (men: r = 0.29; women: r = 0.28, all p < 0.05), and similarly for mortality (men: r = 0.67; women: r = 0.72 [HDI]; men: r = 0.23; women: r = 0.28 [GDP]). In summary, the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer were rising in many countries, requiring regular surveillance.


Subject(s)
Economic Development/statistics & numerical data , Gross Domestic Product/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatic Neoplasms/economics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Asia/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Latin America/epidemiology , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Regression Analysis , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis
3.
Int J Cardiol ; 224: 79-87, 2016 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) has been shown to lower blood pressure in the West. However, the real-life impact of DASH on reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk in routine clinical setting has not been studied. METHODS: A parallel-group, open-labelled, physician-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in January-June 2013 and followed up for 6- and 12-months in primary care settings in Hong Kong. Patients newly diagnosed with grade 1 hypertension (aged 40-70years) who had no concomitant medical conditions requiring dietary modifications were consecutively recruited. Subjects were randomised to standard education (usual care) (n=275), or usual care plus dietitian-delivered DASH-based dietary counselling in a single one-to-one session (intervention) (n=281). Primary outcomes were the changes in estimated 10-year CV risk. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 504 (90.6%) and 485 (87.2%) patients at 6 and 12months, respectively. There was no difference in the reduction of 10-year CV risk between the two groups at 6months (-0.13%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.50% to 0.23%, p=0.477) and 12months (-0.08%, 95% CI -0.33% to 0.18%, p=0.568). Multivariate regression analyses showed that male subjects, younger patients, current smokers, subjects with lower educational level, and those who dined out for main meals for ≥4 times in a typical week were significantly associated with no improvements in CV risk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may not support automatic referral of newly diagnosed grade 1 hypertensive patients for further one-to-one dietitian counselling on top of primary care physician's usual care. Patients with those risk factors identified should receive more clinical attention to reduce their CV risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-TRC-13003014 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx).


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diet therapy , Counseling/methods , Hypertension/diet therapy , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Adult , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Counseling/trends , Diet/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/trends , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(31): e4108, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27495018

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been increasing both globally and locally. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are in a privileged position to provide first contact and continuing care for diabetic patients. A territory-wide Reference Framework for Diabetes Care for Adults has been released by the Hong Kong Primary Care Office in 2010, with the aim to further enhance evidence-based and high quality care for diabetes in the primary care setting through wide adoption of the Reference Framework.A valid questionnaire survey was conducted among PCPs to evaluate the levels of, and the factors associated with, their adoption of the Reference Framework.A total of 414 completed surveys were received with the response rate of 13.0%. The average adoption score was 3.29 (SD 0.51) out of 4. Approximately 70% of PCPs highly adopted the Reference Framework in their routine practice. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the PCPs perceptions on the inclusion of sufficient local information (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.748, 95%CI 1.597-14.115, P = 0.005) and reduction of professional autonomy of PCPs (aOR = 1.859, 95%CI 1.013-3.411, P = 0.045) were more likely to influence their adoption level of the Reference Framework for diabetes care in daily practices.The overall level of guideline adoption was found to be relatively high among PCPs for adult diabetes in primary care settings. The adoption barriers identified in this study should be addressed in the continuous updating of the Reference Framework. Strategies need to be considered to enhance the guideline adoption and implementation capacity.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Guideline Adherence , Physicians, Primary Care/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Disease Management , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/standards , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...