Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 26(1): 56-65, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077861

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis in children. Treatment options have been expanded since the introduction of biologics, which are highly effective. The existing local JIA treatment guideline was published more than a decade ago, when use of biologics was not as common. In this article, we review the latest evidence on using biologics in three JIA subtypes: JIA of polyarticular course (pcJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Based on the latest information, an update on eligibility, response assessment, termination, and safety information for using biologics in these patients was performed. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The JIA Work Group, which consisted of nine paediatricians experienced in managing JIA, was convened in 2016. Publications before July 2017 were screened. Eligible articles were clinical trials, extension studies, systemic reviews, and recommendations from international societies and regulatory agencies about the use of biologics in pcJIA, ERA, and PsA. Evidence extraction, appraisal, and drafting of propositions were performed by two reviewers. Extracted evidence and drafted propositions were presented and discussed at the first two meetings. Overwhelming consensus was obtained at the final meeting in May 2018. Seven practice consensus statements were formulated. Regular review should be performed to keep the practice evidence-based and up-to-date.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Biological Products/adverse effects , Child , Consensus , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 43(9): 2144-7, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10471555

ABSTRACT

A total of 3,205 group A streptoccal isolates were collected in 1997 through a private laboratory which serves community physicians in southern Ontario and which represents a population base of 6 million people. Nonsusceptibility to erythromycin was detected for 67 (2.1%) isolates both by disk diffusion and by broth microdilution. Of these, 47 (70%) were susceptible to clindamycin and were found by PCR to possess the mef gene. Of the other 20 strains, 18 and 2 showed inducible and constitutive resistance, respectively, to clindamycin. Nineteen of these strains were shown by PCR to possess the ermTR gene, and a single constitutively resistant strain harbored an ermB gene. Sixteen (24%) erythromycin-resistant strains were also resistant to tetracycline. All were susceptible to penicillin and chloramphenicol.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Erythromycin/pharmacology , Streptococcus pyogenes/drug effects , Streptococcus pyogenes/genetics , Drug Resistance, Microbial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Genotype , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ontario , Phenotype , Prevalence , Streptococcus pyogenes/classification , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...