Personality traits and workplace bullying among contract trainee doctors in Malaysia.

Introduction: Workplace bullying (WPB) among trainee doctors is a concerning problem in Malaysia. However, there is still limited understanding regarding the influence of trainee doctors' personality traits on WPB. Furthermore, the impact of contract employment status on WPB among trainee doctors is not yet well-defined. To address these gaps, this study was aimed to determine the prevalence of WPB among trainee doctors and to examine the association of sociodemographic characteristics, job characteristics, and personality traits with WPB among trainee doctors in Malaysia. Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted with 264 trainee doctors in Selangor, Malaysia. Eligible participants were provided with sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire, job characteristics questionnaire, WPB questionnaire, and the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Chi-square tests were used to examine the association between: (i) sociodemographic characteristics and WPB, (ii) job characteristics and WPB; and (iii) personality traits and WPB. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between the significant independent variables (as determined from Chi-square tests) and WPB. Results: The prevalence of WPB was 45.1 %, with verbal abuse being the most common form of bullying (46.2 %). Chi-square test showed that only marital status and low agreeableness were significantly associated with WPB. Subsequently, multiple logistic regression demonstrated that being married (OR: 1.866; 95 % CI: 1.077-3.234) and low agreeableness (OR: 2.287; 95 % CI: 1.169-4.473) were significant predictors of WPB. Conclusion: The high prevalence of WPB among trainee doctors could be attributed by marriage and low agreeableness personality traits in this population. In order to minimise WPB and maximise workforce potential, it is essential for healthcare institutions and medical training programmes to recognise this vulnerabilities and take steps to protect and support trainee doctors who are married and/or with low agreeableness personality trait.

Facilitators and barriers of digital health technologies implementation in hospital settings in lower-income and middle-income countries since the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of digital health technologies (DHTs) in hospitals worldwide has been uneven since the COVID-19 pandemic. Ambiguity in defining the landscape of DHTs adds to the complexity of this process. To address these challenges, this scoping review aims to identify the facilitators and barriers of implementing DHTs in hospitals in lower-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) since COVID-19, describe the DHTs that have been adopted in hospital settings in LMIC during this period, and develop a comprehensive classification framework to define the landscape of DHTs implemented in LMIC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature. Descriptive statistics will be used to report the characteristics of included studies. The facilitators and barriers to DHTs implementation, gathered from both quantitative and qualitative data, will be synthesised using a parallel-results convergent synthesis design. A thematic analysis, employing an inductive approach, will be conducted to categorise these facilitators and barriers into coherent themes. Additionally, we will identify and categorise all available DHTs based on their equipment types and methods of operation to develop an innovative classification framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data collection is not involved in this study. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and meetings with key stakeholders and partners in the field of digital health.

Development and validation of a medication non-adherence scale for Malaysian hypertensive patients: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications can lead to hypertension-related complications. One of the most effective preventive measures to mitigate these complications is to understand the underlying determinants of medication non-adherence using various scales. Unfortunately, existing scales for measuring non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications have certain limitations, such as insufficient consideration of validity, dimensionality, and cultural adaptation. In response, the current study aimed to develop and validate a measure of non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications-known as the Malaysian Anti-hypertensive Agent Non-Adherence Scale (MAANS)-for use in local hypertensive patients. METHODS: A two-phase mixed-methods approach was used. Phase 1 involved qualitative interviews with hypertensive patients from two health clinics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The themes extracted from these interviews were used to generate items for the MAANS. In Phase 2, data from 213 participants were analysed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to establish the scale's factor structure, thereby created the modified version of the MAANS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a separate dataset of 205 participants to confirm the factor structure, resulted in the final version of the MAANS. The reliability of the final MAANS version was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The MAANS scores were used to predict subscales of the Malay version of the WHO Quality-of-Life (QOL) BREF, demonstrating the scale's predictive validity. RESULTS: Ten qualitative interviews yielded 73 items. The EFA produced a modified MAANS with 21 items grouped into five factors. However, the CFA retained three factors in the final scale: Perceived Non-Susceptibility, Poor Doctor-Patient Relationship, and Unhealthy Lifestyle. The final 14-item, 3-factor MAANS demonstrated moderate reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.64) and exhibited partial predictive validity, with the Poor Doctor-Patient Relationship and Unhealthy Lifestyle subscales significantly predicting Social QOL and Environmental QOL. CONCLUSION: The MAANS is a reliable, valid, and multidimensional scale specifically developed to evaluate non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications in local clinical settings with the potential to further the advancement of research and practice in sociomedical and preventive medicine.

Insights into frontline healthcare workers' mental health amidst COVID-19 - Sources of workplace worries and coping strategies.

Introduction: This study was aimed to measure the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress as well as to evaluate the associations of these mental disorders with sociodemographic factors, workplace worries, and coping strategies among frontline HCWs in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sociodemographic data questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21, sources of workplace worries questionnaire, and Brief-COPE inventory were randomly distributed to frontline HCWs who worked at the medical, emergency, and anaesthesiology departments. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests and multivariable linear regression analysis. Results: A total of 137 frontline HCWs responded to the questionnaires. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress was 69.3%, 77.4%, and 57.7%, respectively. None of the sociodemographic characteristics was associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. Depression was associated to all sources of workplace worries, except "fear of getting infected" (p = 0.089), while anxiety and stress were associated with all sources of workplace worries. Humour (ß = 0.821), self-blame (ß = 0.686), denial (ß = 0.676), substance use (ß = 0.835), and behavioural disengagement (ß = 0.583) were positively correlated to depression. However, active coping (ß = -0.648) and acceptance (ß = -0.602) were negatively correlated to depression. On the other hand, active coping (ß = 0.913), planning (ß = 0.879), acceptance (ß = 0.831), religion (ß = 0.704), and self-distraction (ß = 0.929) were positively correlated to stress. Only substance use (ß = -0.417) was negatively correlated to stress. All coping strategies did not correlate to anxiety. Conclusion: The high prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress is attributed by the various sources of workplace worries and the inappropriate coping strategies among the frontline HCWs. Measures that minimise workplace worries and inappropriate coping strategies must be implemented promptly.

Assessing 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Malaysians With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Framingham Cardiovascular Versus United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Equations.

In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk equations to predict the 10-year CVD risk among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Malaysia. T2DM patients (n = 660) were randomly selected, and their 10-year CVD risk was calculated using both the Framingham CVD and UKPDS risk equations. The performance of both equations was analyzed using discrimination and calibration analyses. The Framingham CVD, UKPDS coronary heart disease (CHD), UKPDS Fatal CHD, and UKPDS Stroke equations have moderate discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic [aROC] curve = 0.594-0.709). The UKPDS Fatal Stroke demonstrated a good discrimination (aROC curve = 0.841). The Framingham CVD, UKPDS Stroke, and UKPDS Fatal Stroke equations showed good calibration (P = .129 to .710), while the UKPDS CHD and UKPDS Fatal CHD are poorly calibrated (P = .035; P = .036). The UKPDS is a better prediction equation of the 10-year CVD risk among T2DM patients compared with the Framingham CVD equation.

Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in a Primary Care Setting: An Evaluation of the QKidney Model

Abstract@#Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thus, making routine screening among the diabetic group is necessary in order to reduce the burden of the disease. As such, various risk prediction models including QKidney model have been developed for early detection of CKD. However, the Qkidney model has not been validated in Malaysia. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of QKidney model in predicting a 5-year risk of developing CKD in a cohort of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the primary care setting. Methods: A total of 377 T2DM patients attended the primary care clinic at the town of Rawang, aged 30-74 years old, and free of CKD outcomes at baseline were recruited and followed-up for 5 years. Their CKD risk was calculated using the QKidney model. The predictive performance of QKidney model was assessed through discrimination and calibration analyses. Results: At the end of the 5-year follow-up, a total median QKidney score was 3.9% (IQR: 5.9). The median QKidney score of male participants (7.3%) was significantly higher than that of the females (3.0%) (p < 0.001). The QKidney model has a moderate discrimination in which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.748, with good calibration (χ2 = 13.039, p = 0.111). Conclusion: It was found that the QKidney model had a moderate discriminative ability with good calibration. When taken together, it was suggested that the QKidney model could be utilized to predict a moderate-to-severe CKD risk in Malaysians with T2DM.