Phytosterols supplementation decreases plasma small and dense LDL levels in metabolic syndrome patients on a westernized type diet.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several studies have observed a hypocholesterolemic effect of plant sterols in hypercholesterolemic patients on a balanced diet. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of phytosterol supplementation on risk factors of coronary artery disease in metabolic syndrome patients on a Westernized type diet. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized placebo-controlled design 108 patients with metabolic syndrome were assigned to consume either 2 plant sterol-enriched yogurt mini drink which provided 4 g phytosterols per day, or a yogurt beverage without phytosterols (control). The duration of the study was 2 months and the patients in both groups followed their habitual westernized type diet and recording it on food diaries. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and after 2 months of intervention. After 2 months supplementation with phytosterols, a significant reduction in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, small and dense LDL (sdLDL) levels, as well as, apoB and triglycerides concentrations were observed in the intervention group (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. In addition, phytosterol supplementation lowered serum total cholesterol by 15.9%, LDL-cholesterol by 20.3% and triglyceride levels by 19.1% (P = 0.02, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), although the patients kept their habitual westernized type diet. No differences were observed in HDL cholesterol, apoA1, glucose, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen levels and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Phytosterol supplementation improves risk factors of coronary artery disease even if the diet is a westernized type.

The effect of metformin on the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease risk factors in overweight and obese subjects--the Carmos study.

UNLABELLED: We investigated whether the addition of metformin to the treatment of overweight and obese individuals further reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T (2)DM), prediabetes and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RFs). DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 366 adults (mean age 53.0+/-0.5 SE years, and mean BMI 32.3+/-0.2 SE Kg/m (2)) without CVD. All subjects received lifestyle recommendations and drug management of CVD-RFs, whilst 95 of them were additionally given metformin. The follow-up period lasted 12 months. RESULTS: At the end of the study the frequency of T (2)DM in the metformin and non-metformin group was 1.1 and 8.1%, respectively (risk difference=-7% with 95% CI from -12.7% to -1.4%, p=0.012). Participants with prediabetes displayed a greater reduction in the incidence of T (2)DM after taking metformin compared to those who had not received this drug (risk difference=-18.5% with 95%CI from -33.1% to -3.9%, p=0.010). Metformin had a similar beneficial impact on subjects with MetS (risk difference=-12.9% with 95% from -25% to -0.7%, p=0.040) and this was attributed to the greater increase in HDL-C (p=0.046) and decrease in fasting plasma glucose levels (p=0.024). Metformin also achieved a greater reduction in total cholesterol and LDL-C levels (metformin vs. non-metformin treated subjects: -31.9 vs. -17.3 mg/dl, p=0.001, and -26.2 vs. -15.9 mg/dl, p=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin reduces the occurrence of T (2)DM in overweight and obese non-diabetic adults and decreases the rate of MetS by improving the CVD risk factor profile.

The control of dyslipidemia in outpatient clinics in Greece (OLYMPIC) Study.

The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of Greek patients referred to outpatient clinics for dyslipidemia who achieved the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) guidelines, using lifestyle changes, lipid-lowering drug treatment (LLDT), or both. Adult patients with dyslipidemia, who had been receiving a hypolipidemic diet and/or LLDT for at least 3 months were assessed in a multicenter study performed at 66 sites across Greece. Patients were followed up for an additional 3-month treatment period. Lipid levels were recorded at baseline and at the end of the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving their individual LDL-C target at the end of the study, according to their coronary heart disease (CHD) risk status or its equivalents, as defined by the NCEP-ATP III guidelines. Multivariate logistic models were used to identify determinants of undertreatment. The study included 2,660 adults (20-75 years) from 7 regions of Greece. Of the evaluable sample (n = 2,211; men 51%; mean age 62 +/-9 years) 81% were receiving LLDT (96% with statins and 3% with fibrates), 44% had a history of CHD, 61% arterial hypertension, 36% diabetes, and 26% a family history of premature CHD. Overall, 6% were at low CHD risk, 30% at medium CHD risk, and 63% at high CHD risk. At the end of the study, 26% of all patients and 30% of those receiving LLDT achieved the NCEP-specified LDL-C target levels. The percentage of patients at LDL-C goal according to CHD risk status was: low risk 67% (95% CI = 59-75), medium risk 29% (95% CI = 26-33), and high risk 20% (95% CI = 18-22). Statins proved to be more effective than fibrates (p <0.0001). Atorvastatin-treated subjects (n = 1,222, mean dose 19 mg/day) attained the LDL-C target (31% of the cases) at a higher rate than those receiving other LLDT (n = 574, 26% at target, p <0.01) or not receiving drug treatment (n = 415, 8%, p <0.001). This outcome was more evident in the high-CHD risk group (n = 1,402, 26% with atorvastatin vs 16% with other LLDT and 3% not receiving LLDT attained the LDL-C goal, ANOVA, p <0.001). The majority of dyslipidemic patients receiving LLDT, mainly those with high-CHD risk, are not achieving the NCEP LDL-C target. This is mainly explained by inadequate dose titration to ensure target goals are met. Promoting healthy lifestyle and appropriate LLDT (potent statins with sufficient dose titration) must be implemented to ensure that patients attain LDL-C treatment goals and thus benefit from the reduction in individual CHD risk.