Toward the functional interpretation of somatic structural variations: bulk- and single-cell approaches.

Structural variants (SVs) are genomic rearrangements that can take many different forms such as copy number alterations, inversions and translocations. During cell development and aging, somatic SVs accumulate in the genome with potentially neutral, deleterious or pathological effects. Generation of somatic SVs is a key mutational process in cancer development and progression. Despite their importance, the detection of somatic SVs is challenging, making them less studied than somatic single-nucleotide variants. In this review, we summarize recent advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based approaches for detecting somatic SVs at the tissue and single-cell levels and discuss their advantages and limitations. First, we describe the state-of-the-art computational algorithms for somatic SV calling using bulk WGS data and compare the performance of somatic SV detectors in the presence or absence of a matched-normal control. We then discuss the unique features of cutting-edge single-cell-based techniques for analyzing somatic SVs. The advantages and disadvantages of bulk and single-cell approaches are highlighted, along with a discussion of their sensitivity to copy-neutral SVs, usefulness for functional inferences and experimental and computational costs. Finally, computational approaches for linking somatic SVs to their functional readouts, such as those obtained from single-cell transcriptome and epigenome analyses, are illustrated, with a discussion of the promise of these approaches in health and diseases.

Ultrafast prediction of somatic structural variations by filtering out reads matched to pan-genome k-mer sets.

Variant callers typically produce massive numbers of false positives for structural variations, such as cancer-relevant copy-number alterations and fusion genes resulting from genome rearrangements. Here we describe an ultrafast and accurate detector of somatic structural variations that reduces read-mapping costs by filtering out reads matched to pan-genome k-mer sets. The detector, which we named ETCHING (for efficient detection of chromosomal rearrangements and fusion genes), reduces the number of false positives by leveraging machine-learning classifiers trained with six breakend-related features (clipped-read count, split-reads count, supporting paired-end read count, average mapping quality, depth difference and total length of clipped bases). When benchmarked against six callers on reference cell-free DNA, validated biomarkers of structural variants, matched tumour and normal whole genomes, and tumour-only targeted sequencing datasets, ETCHING was 11-fold faster than the second-fastest structural-variant caller at comparable performance and memory use. The speed and accuracy of ETCHING may aid large-scale genome projects and facilitate practical implementations in precision medicine.