Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 125(3S): 101846, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556167

ABSTRACT

Oral and maxillofacial tumors pose a significant clinical challenge due to their tendency to recur, despite advancements in surgical removal techniques. The jaw's intricate structure further complicates treatments and affects patient quality of life. Consequently, emphasis has shifted towards pharmacological interventions, to potentially reduce invasive surgical procedures. One promising approach targets BRAF mutations, specifically the common V600E mutation. BRAF, a critical protein kinase, regulates cell growth and differentiation via the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAP kinase pathway. A specific nucleotide change at position 1799, swapping Thymine (T) for Adenine (A), results in the V600E mutation, causing unchecked cell growth. This mutation is common in certain oral and maxillofacial tumors like ameloblastoma. A recent neoadjuvant therapy targeting BRAF, involving the use of dabrafenib and trametinib, has showcased a promising, safe, and effective strategy for organ preservation in the treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma. This convergence of molecular insights and targeted therapies holds the key to managing BRAF-mutated oral and maxillofacial tumors effectively, promising improved patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Ameloblastoma , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Humans , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Ameloblastoma/genetics , Ameloblastoma/therapy , Ameloblastoma/diagnosis , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Oximes/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/genetics , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(2): e190-e195, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the changes in hard tissue after applying invisible orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and the digital design, and to explore the accuracy of the treatment effect of maxillofacial tissue after invisible orthodontic treatment and orthognathic treatment. METHODS: From September 2020 to January 2022, 25 patients with class III skeletal malocclusion and 7 patients with class II skeletal malocclusion, were treated with invisible orthodontic treatment and orthognathic combined treatment. Orthodontic treatment with preoperative invisible orthodontic treatment followed by orthodontic surgery. All patients had cephalometric lateral films after surgery to analyze orthognathic surgery's goals and surgical effects of orthognathic surgery and the digital design. Measure the angle of the sella-nasion-A point angle, angle of sella-nasion-B point, ANB angle, maxillary convex angle, mandibular plane (MP) angle, 1-SN angle, 1-MP angle, etc, and compare surgery outcome with digital design. RESULT: All patients were satisfied with the effect and no complications occurred. Angle of sella-nasion-A point, angle of sella-nasion-B point, ANB angle, maxillary convex angle, MP angle, 1-SN angle, and 1-MP angle had no significant difference between the postoperative effect and the purpose of digital design ( P >0.05), there was no apparent deviation between the upper and lower jaw and the chin ( P >0.05). CONCLUSION: The combined invisible orthodontic treatment and orthognathic treatment are accurate and effective, and are worthy of promotion. It supplements traditional orthognathic therapy and is suitable for corresponding patients.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Orthognathic Surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Mandible/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Chin , Cephalometry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...