ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There have been doubts that SARS-CoV-2 has been circulating before the first case was announced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of COVID-19 in some cases diagnosed to be viral respiratory tract infection in the pre-pandemic period in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were admitted to our hospital's pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, and intensive care clinics with the diagnosis of viral respiratory system infection within a 6-month period between October 2019 and March 12, 2020, were screened. Around 248 archived respiratory samples from these patients were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid by real-timequantitative polymerase chain reaction. The clinical, laboratory, and radiological data of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 47.5 (18-89 years); 103 (41.5%) were female and 145 (58.4%) were male. The most common presenting symptoms were cough in 51.6% (n = 128), fever in 42.7% (n = 106), and sputum in 27.0% (n = 67). Sixty-nine percent (n = 172) of the patients were pre-diagnosed to have upper respiratory tract infection and 22.0% (n = 55) had pneumonia, one-third of the patients (n = 84, 33.8%) were followed in the service. Respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 123 (49.6%) patients. Influenza virus (31.9%), rhinovirus (10.5%), and human metapneumovirus (6.5%) were the most common pathogens, while none of the samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Findings that could be significant for COVID-19 pneumonia were detected in the thorax computed tomography of 7 cases. CONCLUSION: The negative SARS-CoV-2 real-time-quantitative polymerase chain reaction results in the respiratory samples of the cases followed up in our hospital for viral pneumonia during the pre-pandemic period support that there was no COVID-19 among our cases during the period in question. However, if clinical suspicion arises, both SARS and non-SARS respiratory viral pathogens should be considered for differential diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: New parameters in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are needed for assessing exercise capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the potential of using the desaturation distance ratio (DDR) to assess exercise capacity specifically in patients with IPF. This study aimed to investigate whether DDR is a potential tool for assessing the exercise capacity of patients with IPF. METHODS: This study conducted with 33 subjects with IPF. Pulmonary function tests and a 6MWT were performed. To calculate the DDR, first, the difference between the patient's SpO2 at each minute and the SpO2 of 100% was summed together to determine the desaturation area (DA). Next, DDR was calculated using dividing DA by the 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD) (i.e., DA/6MWD). RESULTS: When correlations of 6MWD and DDR with changes (Δ) in the severity of perceived dyspnea were examined, 6MWD did not significantly correlate with ΔBorg. Conversely, there was a significant correlation between the DDR and ΔBorg (r= 0.488, p=0.004). There were significant correlations between 6MWD and FVC % (r=0.370, p=0.034), and FEV1 % (r=0.465, p=0.006). However, DDR was significantly more correlated with FVC % (r= -0.621, p< 0.001), FEV1 % (r= -0.648, p< 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between DDR and DLCO % (r= -0.342, p=0.052). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that DDR is a promising and more useful parameter for assessing patients with IPF.
