ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Fluoroscopy, a widely used imaging method for RFCA, has significant implications for human health. Although no fluoroscopy or near-zero fluoroscopy strategies have gained popularity, they have limitations, such as long procedure times, additional equipment, and expertise. A simple and cost-effective radiation reduction method is needed for treating AF and is compatible with the daily workflow. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-free and lead apron-free (LAF) after transseptal puncture AF ablation with conventional ablation (CON). METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent RF catheter AF ablation. The lead apron used for protection was removed immediately before 3D reconstruction of the left atrium (LA) after transseptal puncture (TSP), while fluoroscopy was performed on stand-by and locked-in. The pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed using a 3D mapping system, a multielectrode catheter, and a Smart Touch contact force (CF) sensing catheter, via the lead-apron-free (LAF) method, which is similar to the conventional ablation (CON) method. RESULTS: This study enrolled 152 consecutive patients, with 72 and 80 patients in the LAF and CON groups, respectively. The LAF group demonstrated significantly lower values in total fluoroscopy time (6.9 vs. 14 min, P<0.001) and dose area product (DAP) values (15.4±12.1 vs. 31.5±17.4 G/m2, P<0.001) than the CON group. However, there was no significant difference in the total procedure time (83.6±21.1 vs. 77.2±11.4 min, P=0.12) between the two groups. Only four procedures (5.5%) required repositioning of the apron, and no complications were observed with the LAF method. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The LAF method reduced fluoroscopy use compared with CON, with no change in procedure time or efficacy.
