ABSTRACT
Objectives This study aimed to predict patients who have caesarean operations under regional anaesthesia and are at risk for intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV), for ultimately prompting anaesthetists and surgeons to take preventive measures. Methods This was a retrospective study on 209 patients who had caesarean section under spinal-epidural combined regional anaesthesia. The relevant medical history, such as severe nausea and vomiting in the first trimester, smoking, a history of motion sickness, and premenstrual syndrome (PMS), were obtained from the patients' records and interviews. Results Patients who had a female neonate, a history of severe nausea and vomiting in the first trimester, and a history of PMS and motion sickness before pregnancy experienced a significantly higher rate of IONV. Smokers were less susceptible to IONV, but this was not significant. Conclusion This study shows that some factors in the medical history of a patient can help identify those who are more likely to suffer from IONV.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/diagnosis , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Anesthesia, Spinal , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Motion Sickness/physiopathology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Premenstrual Syndrome/physiopathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking/physiopathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a disease which is estimated to be undiagnosed to a large extent. Hence, the prevalence of OSAS in pregnant women is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women with chronic diseases. METHODS: In the study, 97 pregnant women with chronic diseases and 160 healthy pregnant women were included. A form questioning socio-demographic characteristics and pregnancy characteristics, Epworth scale and the Berlin questionnaire to evaluate the risk of OSAS were applied to participants. RESULTS: It has been determined that 10-12.5% of healthy pregnant women, 34-45.4% of pregnants with chronic diseases and 20.6-23.3% of all pregnant women had a high risk of OSAS, the pregnants with chronic disease compared to healthy pregnant women had statistically significant higher risk of OSAS. The risk of OSAS was found to be significantly higher especially in pregnant women with hypertension and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: OSAS can lead to the adverse consequences in pregnancy, should be questioned for all pregnants especially those with chronic diseases. Pregnant women with OSAS should be monitored more carefully in terms of diabetes and hypertension in antenatal care.
