The Safety of Isotretinoin Treatment in Patients with Peanut Allergies.

Background: Isotretinoin, the gold standard treatment for nodulocystic acne vulgaris, is contraindicated in patients with a soy allergy. Due to potential cross-reactivity, a history of peanut allergy is listed as a contraindication to isotretinoin use in some countries. Objective: We sought to further evaluate the safety of isotretinoin use in patients with peanut allergy. Methods: Using Epic's SlicerDicer, patients were identified with both an allergy to peanuts and history of isotretinoin use for treatment of acne vulgaris. Clinical manifestation to peanut exposure, peanut-specific skin prick and/or IgE testing, and adverse reactions to isotretinoin use were recorded via chart review and phone interviews. Results: Ten patients were identified having both a peanut allergy and treatment for acne vulgaris with isotretinoin. All patients tolerated isotretinoin without evidence of allergy. Conclusion: Isotretinoin use did not result in allergic eruptions in patients with a known peanut allergy, however, more robust clinical studies are needed to confirm the extent of its use in this patient population.

Temporary Epiphysiodesis Using the Eight-Plate in the Management of Children with Leg Length Discrepancy: A Retrospective Case Series.

Background: Although eight-plates have been shown to be effective in correcting angular deformities of the knee, the literature is scarce regarding the efficiency of this method in treatment of children with LLD. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency, rates of correction and complications of epiphysiodesis using eight-plate in the management of children with leg length discrepancy (LLD). Methods: Eleven consecutive patients with LLD (7 boys, median age = 9, age range 6-11 years) who were treated by temporary epiphysiodesis using eight-plates were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. The main indication for temporary epiphysiodesis was an LLD between 2 and 5 cm in all patients. LLD and lower limb alignment were examined on lower extremity weight-bearing radiography preoperatively and at skeletal maturity. Longitudinal correction rate was calculated. The final LLD was categorized as ''good result'' (final LLD < 1.5 cm), ''fair result'' (1.5-2 cm), and ''poor result'' (> 2 cm). Results: The mean treatment period with the eight-plate was 44 (min to max = 32-72) months, and the mean follow-up from the index surgery to the final follow-up was 62 (min to max = 39-106) months. The mean LLD was significantly reduced from 39 (range 25-50) mm preoperatively to 22.40 (range 6-55) mm postoperatively (p = 0.006). The mean longitudinal correction rate was found to be 0.48 mm/mo. Radiographic evidence of lower limb deformity in frontal and sagittal planes was determined in neither preoperative nor postoperative deformity analysis. No major complications were recorded. Conclusion: For the management of children with LLD of 2-5 cm, temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using the eight-plate seems to be an effective treatment with low complication rates.