Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 72(6): 403-410, 2022 08 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Denim sandblasting-induced silicosis is a recently identified occupational disease. AIMS: In this study, we aimed to evaluate pulmonary and radiological changes in the long-term follow-up of former denim sandblasters. METHODS: Ninety former denim sandblasters were followed from 2007 to 2018. Chest X-rays were evaluated according to the International Labour Organization (ILO) classification. Baseline and final data were compared. Silicosis prevalence, radiological progression and pulmonary dysfunction were evaluated. RESULTS: All of the sandblasters were men. Their mean age was 34 ± 5 years, mean follow-up time was 9 ± 2 years (mean time since initial exposure: 17 ± 2 years) and mean duration of exposure was 34 ± 25 months. Rates of radiological progression and decline in pulmonary during follow-up were 63% and 39%, respectively. During follow-up, all patients were diagnosed with silicosis. All workers who were ILO category 0 at baseline (n = 26, 29%) progressed to higher categories. The number of patients in Category 2 doubled and the number of patients in Category 3 increased by 2.5-fold. Eleven patients developed new large opacities and the number of patients with category C opacity increased from 4 to 13. Exposure time was an independent determinant of radiological progression (OR: 1.0, P = 0.036) and decline in pulmonary function (OR: 1.3, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of silicosis in denim sandblasters increases steadily even after exposure is discontinued. Radiological progression was observed in a higher proportion of workers than a decline in lung function. Duration of exposure was the major determinant of disease progression in our study.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Silicosis , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Silicosis/diagnostic imaging , Silicosis/epidemiology , Silicosis/etiology , Textile Industry , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 69(3): 219-222, 2019 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30869783

ABSTRACT

After excluding alternative explanations, a silicosis diagnosis is based on the combination of appropriate silica exposure history and compatible clinical, radiological and occasionally pathological findings. Not taking appropriate occupational history by a physician may cause a misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of silicosis. Herein, we present a female worker in a small-scale sandblasting factory who worked as a controller. Her silicosis diagnosis was established 10 years after her first symptoms, and she underwent invasive procedures due to a lack of inquiry about her occupational history. Gender bias may be one of the reasons that her occupational history was not taken.


Subject(s)
Delayed Diagnosis/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Silicosis/diagnosis , Adult , Cough , Dyspnea , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Medical History Taking , Sexism , Silicosis/physiopathology , Textile Industry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...