Enhanced recovery for acute open lower limb fracture 'fix and flap'.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery (ER) aims to achieve earlier recovery, reduced hospital length of stay (LoS) whilst improving outcomes. Our ER protocol for acute lower-limb open fracture (ALLOFs) includes dangling at day 3 and mobilising fully weight-bearing from day 5. Our aims were to evaluate the outcomes of ALLOFs using our ER protocol for limb salvage, LoS following 'fix & flap', return to theatre, rate of successful flap salvage, flap failure and deep infection rates. METHODS: An observational study of a prospectively maintained lower limb flap database from September 2020 to January 2023 was undertaken. Search criteria encompassed patients with a Gustilo IIIB/C injury and a free flap reconstruction. Exclusions were for local/perforator flaps, soft tissue injury only, fracture related/prosthetic joint infections, or chronic osteomyelitis cases. RESULTS: 161 patients were available for analysis, 126 male (78 %) and 35 female (22 %) with a median age of 40 years (12-79, interquartile range 30.0). 81 % of cases were high-energy injuries. For all patients, the median time to definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage from injury was 4 days (0-30, interquartile range 2). 18 cases (11.2 %) required return to theatre for flap exploration; 11 cases were successfully salvaged (61 %). Nine free flaps failed (5.4 %). The median total LoS from admission was 10 days (6 to 46, interquartile range 5), with a median LoS following definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage of 7 days (4 to 20, interquartile range 3). The median follow-up period was 18 months (12 to 38.2, interquartile range 9), with a deep infection rate of 6.5 %. CONCLUSION: In isolated ALLOFs, our ER protocol is safe and effective in shortening the LoS. Our outcomes sit comfortably within acceptable ranges of contemporary literature for return to theatre, flap salvage/failure and deep infection. Our ER protocol actively involves our allied health professional colleagues early to facilitate discharge.

The value of a bariatric specific chart to initiate resuscitation of adult bariatric burns.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of obese adults is rising across the world with a tripling of rates since 1975. The resuscitation of large burns in obese patients brings unique challenges leading some to advocate the use of a bariatric specific burn chart. AIMS: We sought to determine whether bariatric burn specific charts can better estimate burn percentage to prevent under resuscitation. We also reviewed the impact of obesity upon the length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective case note review, of patients identified from the prospective International Burns Injury Database (iBID), was undertaken of patients' ≥18 years of age with burns ≥15% of their total body surface area. RESULTS: There were 79 overweight and 53 bariatric patients from a total of 232 patients identified. There was no statistical difference in burn percentage or fluid input estimation between the Lund & Browder and Neaman charts. Complications were seen in 51% of the normal weight patients. Obese patients had a similar incidence of death (24%) compared to the normal weight group (26%). The class I obese had the lowest complication rate at 28% and lowest mortality rate at 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric specific charts did not demonstrate any benefits in optimising bariatric resuscitation. There appears to be a 'physiological benefit' in the class I obese who sustained burns undergoing resuscitation.