Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Am Econ Rev Insights ; 4(3): 389-407, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36338144

ABSTRACT

Most hospitals have financial assistance programs for low-income patients. We use administrative data from Kaiser Permanente to study the effects of financial assistance on healthcare utilization. Using a regression discontinuity design based on an income threshold for program eligibility, we find that financial assistance increases the likelihood of an inpatient, ambulatory and emergency department encounter by 3.6 pp (59%), 13.4 pp (20%), and 6.7 pp (53%), respectively, though effects dissipate three quarters after program receipt. Financial assistance also increases the detection and management of treatment-sensitive conditions (e.g., drugs treating diabetes), suggesting financial assistance may increase receipt of high-value care.

2.
JAMA Health Forum ; 3(5): e221031, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977262

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study evaluates the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and reported new medical debt from 2018 to 2021 across the US.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics
3.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 41(1): 129-137, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34982628

ABSTRACT

We tested the impact of personalized telephone calls from service center representatives on health plan enrollment in California's Affordable Care Act Marketplace, Covered California, using a randomized controlled trial. The study sample included 79,522 consumers who had applied but not selected a plan. Receiving a call increased enrollment by 2.7 percentage points (22.5 percent) overall. Among subgroups, receiving a call significantly increased enrollment among consumers with income below 200 percent of the federal poverty level (4.0 percentage points or 47.6 percent for consumers with incomes below 150 percent of poverty and 4.0 percentage points or 36.4 percent for consumers with incomes of 150-199 of poverty), as well as those who were referred from Medicaid (2.9 percentage points or 53.7 percent), those ages 30-50 (2.4 percentage points or 23.3 percent) or older than age 50 (5.1 percentage points or 34.2 percent), those who were Hispanic (2.3 percentage points or 31.1 percent), and those whose preferred spoken language was Spanish (3.2 percentage points or 74.4 percent) or English (2.6 percentage points or 18.6 percent). The intervention provided a two-to-one return on investment. Yet absolute enrollment in the target population remained low; persistent enrollment barriers may have limited the intervention's impact. These findings inform implementation of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which expands eligibility for subsidized coverage.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adult , Eligibility Determination , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Medicaid , Middle Aged , Telephone , United States
4.
JAMA ; 326(18): 1873-1874, 2021 11 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34751712
5.
JAMA ; 326(3): 250-256, 2021 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34283184

ABSTRACT

Importance: Medical debt is an increasing concern in the US, yet there is limited understanding of the amount and distribution of medical debt, and its association with health care policies. Objective: To measure the amount of medical debt nationally and by geographic region and income group and its association with Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data on medical debt in collections were obtained from a nationally representative 10% panel of consumer credit reports between January 2009 and June 2020 (reflecting care provided prior to the COVID-19 pandemic). Income data were obtained from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey. The sample consisted of 4.1 billion person-month observations (nearly 40 million unique individuals). These data were used to estimate the amount of medical debt (nationally and by geographic region and zip code income decile) and to examine the association between Medicaid expansion and medical debt (overall and by income group). Exposures: Geographic region (US Census region), income group (zip code income decile), and state Medicaid expansion status. Main Outcomes and Measures: The stock (all unpaid debt listed on credit reports) and flow (new debt listed on credit reports during the preceding 12 months) of medical debt in collections that can be collected on by debt collectors. Results: In June 2020, an estimated 17.8% of individuals had medical debt (13.0% accrued debt during the prior year), and the mean amount was $429 ($311 accrued during the prior year). The mean stock of medical debt was highest in the South and lowest in the Northeast ($616 vs $167; difference, $448 [95% CI, $435-$462]) and higher in poor than in rich zip code income deciles ($677 vs $126; difference, $551 [95% CI, $520-$581]). Between 2013 and 2020, the states that expanded Medicaid in 2014 experienced a decline in the mean flow of medical debt that was 34.0 percentage points (95% CI, 18.5-49.4 percentage points) greater (from $330 to $175) than the states that did not expand Medicaid (from $613 to $550). In the expansion states, the gap in the mean flow of medical debt between the lowest and highest zip code income deciles decreased by $145 (95% CI, $95-$194) while the gap increased by $218 (95% CI, $163-$273) in the nonexpansion states. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides an estimate of the amount of medical debt in collections in the US based on consumer credit reports from January 2009 to June 2020, reflecting care delivered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and suggests that the amount of medical debt was highest among individuals living in the South and in lower-income communities. However, further study is needed regarding debt related to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Financing, Personal/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health/economics , Medicaid/economics , Medically Uninsured , Social Determinants of Health , United States
6.
J Occup Environ Med ; 59(2): 198-204, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166126

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine workplace productivity losses attributable to breast cancer progression. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis linking 2005 to 2012 medical and pharmacy claims and workplace absence data in the US patients were commercially insured women aged 18 to 64 diagnosed with breast cancer. Productivity was measured as employment status and total quarterly workplace hours missed, and valued using average US wages. RESULTS: Six thousand four hundred and nine women were included. Breast cancer progression was associated with a lower probability of employment (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, P < 0.01) and increased workplace hours missed. The annual value of missed work was $24,166 for non-metastatic and $30,666 for metastatic patients. Thus, progression to metastatic disease is associated with an additional $6500 in lost work time (P < 0.05), or 14% of average US wages. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer progression leads to diminished likelihood of employment, increased workplace hours missed, and increased cost burden.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cost of Illness , Efficiency , Administrative Claims, Healthcare , Adolescent , Adult , Disease Progression , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , United States , Workplace/economics , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
Rev Econ Stat ; 97(2): 314-331, 2015 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937676

ABSTRACT

By influencing the size and bargaining power of private insurers, public subsidization of private health insurance may project effects beyond the subsidized population. We test for such spillovers by analyzing how increases in insurer size resulting from the implementation of Medicare Part D affected drug prices negotiated in the non-Medicare commercial market. On average, Part D lowered prices for commercial enrollees by 3.7%. The external commercial market savings amount to $1.5 billion per year, which, if passed to consumers, approximates the internal cost-savings of newly-insured subsidized beneficiaries. If retained by insurers, it corresponds to a 5% average increase in profitability.

8.
Am J Manag Care ; 18(11 Suppl): S257-64, 2012 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23327457

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Although clinical trial data have quantified patient survival gains associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia, the overall value of these benefits is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the total value of survival gains associated with first- and second-line TKI therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the fraction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)- related survival-gain value retained by patients and drug companies. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study identified CML patient data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, dasatinib clinical trials, and insurance claims data sets. METHODS: Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate improvements in CML survival associated with the introduction of first-line imatinib therapy. Survival gains associated with second-line dasatinib treatment were identified via retrospective analyses and published clinical outcomes. An economic model was developed to calculate the social value of survival gains derived from first- and second-line TKI treatment. TKI costs were used to estimate the fraction of survival gain value retained by patients and drug companies. RESULTS: The introduction of TKIs in 2001 was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.833 (P <.01). Cost analyses indicate that the TKI drug class in CML therapy has created more than $143 billion in social value. Approximately 90% of this value is retained by patients and society, while approximately 10% is recouped by drug companies. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates indicate that the introduction of TKI drugs to treat CML has generated significant social value as a result of survival gains, the vast majority of which has accrued to patients.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Social Values , Survival Analysis
10.
Health Serv Res ; 45(1): 133-51, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20002765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of Part D on 65-78-year-old noninstitutionalized dual eligibles' prescription utilization and expenditures. DATA SOURCE: Random sample of unique pharmacy customers of a national retail pharmacy chain who filled at least one prescription during both 2005 and 2006. For each subject, we obtained claims data for every prescription filled between January 1, 2005, and April 31, 2007. STUDY DESIGN: Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the experience of a "treatment" group (dual eligibles between 65 and 78 years on January 1, 2005) with that of a "control" group (near-elderly patients with Medicaid coverage between 60 and 63 years on January 1, 2005) during the first 18 months after Part D implementation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Expenditures for the treatment and control groups tracked each other closely in the pre-Part D period. Immediately following the implementation of Part D, expenditures for both groups decreased and then leveled off. There were no significant changes in trends in the dual eligibles' out-of-pocket expenditures, total monthly expenditures, pill-days, or total number of prescriptions due to Part D. CONCLUSIONS: We find no evidence that Part D adversely affected pharmaceutical utilization or out-of-pocket expenditures of dual eligibles during the transition period, nor during the 16 months subsequent to Part D implementation.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/economics , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Eligibility Determination , Medicare Part D , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Aged , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Female , Financing, Personal , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Medicaid , Middle Aged , United States
11.
J Health Econ ; 28(5): 950-62, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19671480

ABSTRACT

The Orphan Drug Act (ODA) was designed to spur the development of drugs for rare diseases. In principle, its design also incentivizes pharmaceutical firms to develop drugs for "rare" subdivisions of more prevalent diseases. I find that in response to this incentive, firms develop drugs for ODA-qualifying subdivisions of non-rare diseases. The impact in these tailored drug markets represents half of the total R&D response to the ODA. I also find that 10-percent of the innovation in subdivided disease drugs induced by the ODA would have been conducted without the policy. While modest in size, this inefficiency suggests that agency problems should be considered when designing innovation policy.


Subject(s)
Health Policy/economics , Orphan Drug Production/economics , Precision Medicine/economics , Rare Diseases/economics , Research Support as Topic/economics , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Models, Econometric , Orphan Drug Production/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 23(10): 1673-8, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18661190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little information exists regarding the impact of Medicare Part D on generic drug use. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the use of generic prescriptions attributable to Part D among a sample of Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Difference-in-difference analysis of pharmacy claims of Part D enrollees and non-enrollees aged 67-79 years from 2005 to 2006. The final sample represented approximately 2.4 million unique subjects. Analyses were conducted separately for major therapeutic classes, limited to subjects filling at least one prescription within the class during 2005 and 2006, and adjusted for subject characteristics, prescription characteristics, socio-demographic characteristics measured through zipcode-linked Census data, baseline differences between Part D and non-Part D enrollees, and secular trends in generic use. RESULTS: Generic drugs accounted for 58% of total prescriptions. Among the entire group of beneficiaries, there was a trend of increased generic drug use in 13 out of 15 drug classes examined. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the growth rate of generic drug use was lower among Part D enrollees than among non-enrollees; enrollees were slightly less likely to fill prescriptions for generic drugs vs. brand-name drugs in 2006 compared to 2005 (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Despite secular trends of increased utilization of generic drugs among both Part D enrollees and non-enrollees, the net impact of Part D among these beneficiaries was a modest decrease in the use of generic drugs. This finding, which is consistent with economic theory but contrary to several recent reports, highlights the complexity of assessing the impact of Part D on overall consumer welfare.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/economics , Drug Utilization Review , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Medicare Part D/economics , Aged , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Drug Utilization Review/trends , Female , Humans , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/trends , Male , Medicare Part D/trends , Random Allocation , United States
13.
J Health Econ ; 27(4): 1060-1077, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18395277

ABSTRACT

I study the impact of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA), which established tax incentives for rare disease drug development. I examine the flow of new clinical drug trials for a large set of rare diseases. Among more prevalent rare diseases, the ODA led to a significant and sustained increase in new trials. The impact for less prevalent rare diseases was limited to an increase in the stock of drugs. Tax credits can stimulate R & D; yet because they leave revenue margins unaffected, tax credits appear to have a more limited impact on private innovation in markets with smaller revenue potential.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry/economics , Motivation , Orphan Drug Production/economics , Health Policy , Orphan Drug Production/legislation & jurisprudence , Research , United States
14.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(3): 169-77, 2008 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18180465

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information about the effect of the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit on drug utilization and expenditures is limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate changes in prescription utilization and out-of-pocket expenditures attributable to Part D among a sample of persons eligible for the benefit. DESIGN: Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate changes in expenditures and utilization among beneficiaries. A control group was included to control for secular trends unrelated to the Part D benefit. SETTING: National pharmacy chain representing approximately 15% of all U.S. retail pharmacy sales. PARTICIPANTS: Persons age 66 to 79 years (those eligible for Part D) and a control group of persons age 60 to 63 years (those ineligible for Part D). The final sample represented approximately 5.1 million unique beneficiaries and 1.8 million unique control individuals. MEASUREMENTS: Prescription utilization (measured in pill-days) and out-of-pocket expenditures, as determined from pharmacy claims from September 2004 to April 2007. RESULTS: During the penalty-free Part D enrollment period (January 2006 to May 2006), average monthly drug utilization increased by 1.1% (95% CI, 0.5% to 1.7%; P < 0.001) and out-of-pocket expenditures decreased by 8.8% (CI, 6.6% to 11.0%; P < 0.001). After enrollment stabilized (June 2006 to April 2007), average monthly drug utilization increased by 5.9% (CI, 5.1% to 6.7%; P < 0.001) and out-of-pocket expenditures decreased by 13.1% (CI, 9.6% to 16.6%; P = 0.003). Compared with eligible nonenrollees, enrollees had higher out-of-pocket expenditures and utilization at baseline but experienced significantly larger decreases in expenditures and increases in utilization after enrollment. LIMITATIONS: Analyses were limited to claims within 1 pharmacy chain. The effect of the "doughnut hole" and the effect of changes on clinical outcomes were not evaluated. CONCLUSION: The Medicare Part D prescription benefit resulted in modest increases in average drug utilization and decreases in average out-of-pocket expenditures among Part D beneficiaries. Further research is needed to examine patterns among other beneficiaries and to evaluate the effect of these changes on health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/economics , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Medicare Part D , Aged , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...