ABSTRACT
Resources to support long-term medication adherence in kidney transplantation are limited. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an intervention designed for kidney transplant recipients to enhance medication adherence. A single-blind, multi-site, 12-month pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted at all five public hospitals providing adult kidney transplantation in Victoria, Australia. Participants were recruited at 4 to 6 weeks post-transplantation. Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to a 3-month intervention, involving a face-to-face meeting (a medication review and a consumer-centred video) and health coaching every two weeks. Thirty-six were randomised to receive usual care. All participants were followed for nine months post-intervention. There were no differences in adherence between groups measured by Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), however, it was underutilised by 42% of participants. Based on the self-reported Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS©) score, the percentage of adherent participants decreased significantly between baseline and 3 to 12 months in the control group (p-values < 0.001) whilst the percentage of adherent participants in the intervention group remained constant over time. No group differences were detected in other outcomes. Due to the complex medication regimen, developing and testing a medication adherence intervention is difficult in kidney transplantation.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Medication Adherence , Adult , Audiovisual Aids , Counseling , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Pilot Projects , Single-Blind Method , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Telemedicine , Telephone , Treatment Outcome , VictoriaABSTRACT
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The shortage of kidney donors and benefits of kidney transplantation make graft success imperative. Medication adherence is critical to prevent the risk of graft rejection. This paper examines how adults are prepared and supported by renal transplant co-ordinators and pharmacists to take their medications as prescribed in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Renal transplant co-ordinators and pharmacists of all five hospitals offering adult kidney transplantation in Victoria, Australia, were interviewed between November 2013 and February 2014. All data underwent qualitative descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Nine renal transplant co-ordinators and six pharmacists were interviewed. Although there was no standardized approach to education or other evidence-based strategies to facilitate medication adherence, there were similarities between sites. These similarities included printed information, pre-transplant education sessions, the use of medication lists and medication administration aids, intensive education in hospital and ensuring an adequate supply of medications post-discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplant co-ordinators and pharmacists recognized the importance of early patient education concerning immunosuppressant medication. However, each site had developed their own way of preparing a patient for kidney transplantation and follow-up in the acute hospital setting based on experience and practice. Other non-educational strategies involving behavioural and emotional aspects were less common. Differences in usual care reinforce the necessity for evidence-based health care for best patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Medication Adherence , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Base Sequence , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/urine , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Medication Knowledge , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Reminder Systems , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , VictoriaABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare complication rates and tube performance of percutaneous mushroom gastrostomy, balloon gastrostomy, and gastrojejunostomy. METHODS: Between September 9, 1999 and April 23, 2001, 203 patients underwent 250 radiologically guided percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy procedures. Follow-up was conducted through chart reviews and review of our interventional radiology database. Procedural and catheter-related complications were recorded. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: In patients receiving mushroom-retained gastrostomy catheters (n = 114), the major complication rate was 0.88% (n = 1), the minor complication rate was 5.3% (n = 6), and the tube complication rate was 4.4% (n = 5). In patients receiving balloon-retained gastrostomy tubes (n = 67), the major complication rate was 0, the minor complication rate was 4.5% (n = 3), and the tube complication rate was 34.3% (n = 23). In patients receiving gastrojejunostomy catheters (n = 69), the major complication rate was 1.4% (n = 1), the minor complication rate was 2.9% (n = 2), and the tube complication rate was 34.8% (n = 24). No statistically significant differences were found between procedural or peri-procedural complications among the different types of tubes. Mushroom-retained catheters had significantly fewer tube complications (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy have similar procedural and peri-procedural complication rates. Mushroom gastrostomy catheters have fewer tube-related complications compared with balloon gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheters. In addition, mushroom-retained catheters exhibit the best overall long-term tube patency and are therefore the gastrostomy catheter of choice.
