Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
RNA Biol ; 17(1): 75-86, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31559901

ABSTRACT

High-throughput sequencing is increasingly favoured to assay the presence and abundance of microRNAs (miRNAs) in biological samples, even from low RNA amounts, and a number of commercial vendors now offer kits that allow miRNA sequencing from sub-nanogram (ng) inputs. Although biases introduced during library preparation have been documented, the relative performance of current reagent kits has not been investigated in detail. Here, six commercial kits capable of handling <100ng total RNA input were used for library preparation, performed by kit manufactures, on synthetic miRNAs of known quantities and human total RNA samples. We compared the performance of miRNA detection sensitivity, reliability, titration response and the ability to detect differentially expressed miRNAs. In addition, we assessed the use of unique molecular identifiers (UMI) sequence tags in one kit. We observed differences in detection sensitivity and ability to identify differentially expressed miRNAs between the kits, but none were able to detect the full repertoire of synthetic miRNAs. The reliability within the replicates of all kits was good, while larger differences were observed between the kits, although none could accurately quantify the relative levels of the majority of miRNAs. UMI tags, at least within the input ranges tested, offered little advantage to improve data utility. In conclusion, biases in miRNA abundance are heavily influenced by the kit used for library preparation, suggesting that comparisons of datasets prepared by different procedures should be made with caution. This article is intended to assist researchers select the most appropriate kit for their experimental conditions.


Subject(s)
Gene Library , Genetic Engineering/methods , MicroRNAs/genetics , Genetic Engineering/standards , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , MicroRNAs/chemical synthesis , Reproducibility of Results , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
2.
Dev Biol ; 419(1): 184-197, 2016 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26808209

ABSTRACT

Land plant bodies develop from meristems, groups of pluripotent stem cells, which may persist throughout the life of a plant or, alternatively, have a transitory existence. Early diverging land plants exhibit indeterminate (persistent) growth in their haploid gametophytic generation, whereas later diverging lineages exhibit indeterminate growth in their diploid sporophytic generation, raising the question of whether genetic machinery directing meristematic functions was co-opted between generations. Class III HD-Zip (C3HDZ) genes are required for the establishment and maintenance of shoot apical meristems in flowering plants. We demonstrate that in the moss Physcomitrella patens, C3HDZ genes are expressed in transitory meristems in both the gametophytic and sporophytic generations, but not in the persistent shoot meristem of the gametyphyte. Loss-of-function of P. patens C3HDZ was engineered using ectopic expression of miR166, an endogenous regulator of C3HDZ gene activity. Loss of C3HDZ gene function impaired the function of gametophytic transitory meristematic activity but did not compromise the functioning of the persistent shoot apical meristem during the gametophyte generation. These results argue against a wholesale co-option of meristematic gene regulatory networks from the gametophyte to the sporophyte during land plant evolution, instead suggesting that persistent meristems with a single apical cell in P. patens and persistent complex meristems in flowering plants are regulated by different genetic programs.


Subject(s)
Bryopsida/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Genes, Plant , Homeodomain Proteins/physiology , Plant Leaves/growth & development , Plant Proteins/physiology , Transcription Factors/physiology , Base Sequence , Bryopsida/growth & development , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Leucine Zippers/genetics , Life Cycle Stages , Meristem/cytology , Meristem/metabolism , Multigene Family , Phylogeny , Plant Leaves/metabolism , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Shoots/growth & development , Plant Shoots/metabolism , RNA, Plant/genetics , Reproduction , Sequence Alignment , Species Specificity , Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
Science ; 339(6123): 1067-70, 2013 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23449590

ABSTRACT

Unlike animals, land plants undergo an alternation of generations, producing multicellular bodies in both haploid (1n: gametophyte) and diploid (2n: sporophyte) generations. Plant body plans in each generation are regulated by distinct developmental programs initiated at either meiosis or fertilization, respectively. In mosses, the haploid gametophyte generation is dominant, whereas in vascular plants-including ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms-the diploid sporophyte generation is dominant. Deletion of the class 2 KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX (KNOX2) transcription factors in the moss Physcomitrella patens results in the development of gametophyte bodies from diploid embryos without meiosis. Thus, KNOX2 acts to prevent the haploid-specific body plan from developing in the diploid plant body, indicating a critical role for the evolution of KNOX2 in establishing an alternation of generations in land plants.


Subject(s)
Bryopsida/anatomy & histology , Bryopsida/growth & development , Diploidy , Genes, Plant/physiology , Germ Cells, Plant/growth & development , Haploidy , Homeodomain Proteins/physiology , Bryopsida/genetics , Gene Deletion , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...