Saikosaponin-d, a novel SERCA inhibitor, induces autophagic cell death in apoptosis-defective cells.

Autophagy is an important cellular process that controls cells in a normal homeostatic state by recycling nutrients to maintain cellular energy levels for cell survival via the turnover of proteins and damaged organelles. However, persistent activation of autophagy can lead to excessive depletion of cellular organelles and essential proteins, leading to caspase-independent autophagic cell death. As such, inducing cell death through this autophagic mechanism could be an alternative approach to the treatment of cancers. Recently, we have identified a novel autophagic inducer, saikosaponin-d (Ssd), from a medicinal plant that induces autophagy in various types of cancer cells through the formation of autophagosomes as measured by GFP-LC3 puncta formation. By computational virtual docking analysis, biochemical assays and advanced live-cell imaging techniques, Ssd was shown to increase cytosolic calcium level via direct inhibition of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase pump, leading to autophagy induction through the activation of the Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase-AMP-activated protein kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. In addition, Ssd treatment causes the disruption of calcium homeostasis, which induces endoplasmic reticulum stress as well as the unfolded protein responses pathway. Ssd also proved to be a potent cytotoxic agent in apoptosis-defective or apoptosis-resistant mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, which either lack caspases 3, 7 or 8 or had the Bax-Bak double knockout. These results provide a detailed understanding of the mechanism of action of Ssd, as a novel autophagic inducer, which has the potential of being developed into an anti-cancer agent for targeting apoptosis-resistant cancer cells.

Disulfiram modulated ROS-MAPK and NFκB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that disulfiram (DS), an anti-alcoholism drug, is cytotoxic to cancer cell lines and reverses anticancer drug resistance. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the major cause of chemoresistance leading to the failure of cancer chemotherapy. This study intended to examine the effect of DS on breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). METHODS: The effect of DS on BC cell lines and BCSCs was determined by MTT, western blot, CSCs culture and CSCs marker analysis. RESULTS: Disulfiram was highly toxic to BC cell lines in vitro in a copper (Cu)-dependent manner. In Cu-containing medium (1 µM), the IC(50) concentrations of DS in BC cell lines were 200-500 nM. Disulfiram/copper significantly enhanced (3.7-15.5-fold) cytotoxicity of paclitaxel (PAC). Combination index isobologram analysis demonstrated a synergistic effect between DS/Cu and PAC. The increased Bax and Bcl2 protein expression ratio indicated that intrinsic apoptotic pathway may be involved in DS/Cu-induced apoptosis. Clonogenic assay showed DS/Cu-inhibited clonogenicity of BC cells. Mammosphere formation and the ALDH1(+VE) and CD24(Low)/CD44(High) CSCs population in mammospheres were significantly inhibited by exposure to DS/Cu for 24 h. Disulfiram/copper induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and activated its downstream apoptosis-related cJun N-terminal kinase and p38 MAPK pathways. Meanwhile, the constitutive NFκB activity in BC cell lines was inhibited by DS/Cu. CONCLUSION: Disulfiram/copper inhibited BCSCs and enhanced cytotoxicity of PAC in BC cell lines. This may be caused by simultaneous induction of ROS and inhibition of NFκB.

Ocular hypertensive response to topical dexamethasone in children: a dose-dependent phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ocular-hypertensive response to different dosages of topical dexamethasone eye drops in Chinese children. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one consecutive children undergoing bilateral strabismus surgery. INTERVENTION: Topical dexamethasone (0.1%) was administered to children undergoing bilateral strabismus surgery. They were all less than 10 years of age. One eye was randomized to receive a regimen of four times daily, and another received a twice daily regimen. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was serially measured in the postoperative period for 4 weeks or more. Topical steroids were discontinued if IOP was 30 mmHg or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure was measured on the day before the surgery, on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, and 2 weeks thereafter until the IOP reached preoperative levels. Peak IOP, IOP net increase, and time to reach an IOP more than 20 mmHg in the two study groups were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (20 male, 11 female) were examined. The mean age was 5.8 +/- 2.0 years (range, 2-10 years). Preoperative IOP in groups treated twice daily and four times daily were similar. After topical dexamethasone treatment, both groups showed a significant rise in peak IOP compared with preoperative values (twice daily, 25.2 +/- 6.8 mmHg vs. 14.3 +/- 2.4 mmHg, P < 0.001; four times daily, 28.7 +/- 6.9 mmHg vs. 14.3 +/- 2.9 mmHg, P < 0.001). The peak IOP was significantly higher in the four times daily group (P < 0.001), as was the net increase in IOP (twice daily, 10.9 +/- 5.8 mmHg vs. four times daily, 14.5 +/- 6.4 mmHg; P < 0.001). There was no difference in time for both groups to achieve the peak IOP, but the time to exceed its upper normal value (20 mmHg) was shorter in the four times daily group (twice daily, 12.3 +/- 9.1 days vs. four times daily, 10.0 +/- 7.4 days; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In children treated with topical dexamethasone, ocular hypertension occurs in a dose-dependent manner. Children in the four times daily group had a quicker onset and more severe ocular hypertensive response than the twice daily group. Nevertheless, even the twice daily regimen produced significant IOP rise, suggesting that dexamethasone use in children should be avoided if possible, and it would be desirable to monitor the IOP twice weekly when it is administered to children.

Direct interaction of Jak1 and v-Abl is required for v-Abl-induced activation of STATs and proliferation.

In Abelson murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV)-transformed cells, members of the Janus kinase (Jak) family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases and the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family of signaling proteins are constitutively activated. In these cells, the v-Abl oncoprotein and the Jak proteins physically associate. To define the molecular mechanism of constitutive Jak-STAT signaling in these cells, the functional significance of the v-Abl-Jak association was examined. Mapping the Jak1 interaction domain in v-Abl demonstrates that amino acids 858 to 1080 within the carboxyl-terminal region of v-Abl bind Jak1 through a direct interaction. A mutant of v-Abl lacking this region exhibits a significant defect in Jak1 binding in vivo, fails to activate Jak1 and STAT proteins, and does not support either the proliferation or the survival of BAF/3 cells in the absence of cytokine. Cells expressing this v-Abl mutant show extended latency and decreased frequency in generating tumors in nude mice. In addition, inducible expression of a kinase-inactive mutant of Jak1 protein inhibits the ability of v-Abl to activate STATs and to induce cytokine-independent proliferation, indicating that an active Jak1 is required for these v-Abl-induced signaling pathways in vivo. We propose that Jak1 is a mediator of v-Abl-induced STAT activation and v-Abl induced proliferation in BAF/3 cells, and may be important for efficient transformation of immature B cells by the v-abl oncogene.

Retrospective investigation of intermittent bolus intrathecal morphine for cancer pain patients.

One hundred patients with intolerable cancer pain were treated with intrathecal bolus injections of morphine(IT morphine). The study began 2 days later after port-A cath implantation and continued during the 12 weeks follow-up period. During the investigation, the dosages, pain intensity, side effects, complications, activity and acceptibility were recorded. Initially, the morphine test does(0.2mg) resulted in pain relief for 8-26 hrs (mean 13.4 hrs). Then, changing the morphine dosages or frequency of injections were relied upon the effect of the opiate to provide 24 hrs pain relief. The mean morphine requirements were 0.32mg in 1st week, 0.44mg in 4th week, 1.25mg in 8th week and 1.43mg in 12th week. The mean morphine dose before IT treatment was 36.4mg. The vast majority of patients' pain intensity decreased prominently after IT morphine treatment. But pain was aggravated in the 12th week although the morphine dose increased. Side effects were minimal, and only one patient suffered from meningitis. Complications included 8 patients with port-A system dysfunction, one with anterior spinal artery syndrome, and one case of cauda equina syndrome. Activity improved significantly and all patients accepted the kind of treatment though some patients did not experience completely satisfactory relief from pain. Intrathecal morphine therapy uses only small amounts of opiate to achieve the optimal level of pain relief. So it offers a beneficial treatment option to patients whose pain has become intolerable or who have poor responsiveness to systemic narcotics.