Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
SAGE Open Med ; 11: 20503121231194429, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146496

ABSTRACT

Background: In spite of, the need for evidence-based intervention on the potential harmful effects of self-medication practices during pregnancy, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis study regarding self-medication practices in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine prevalence of self-medication practice and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia. Method: We used PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, the Wiley Online Library, and African Journals Online to choose important studies. The I-squared statistic method was used to check for heterogeneity between studies. Random effect model was used to estimate the pool prevalence of self-medication among pregnant women. Publication bias was determined by the funnel plot and Egger's test. Result: A total of 11 studies with 4643 study participants were included in this review. The finding from the current meta-analysis showed that the overall prevalence of self-medication practice among pregnant women is 33.92% (95% CI: 23.15-44.70, I² value = 80.9%). First trimester of pregnancy (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.44-3.47), women who faced health problems during pregnancies at the moment (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 3.92-8.29), previous self-medication practice (OR: 13.07, 95% CI: 5.14-33.25) and previous pregnancy-related problems (OR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.44-2.96) were positively associated with self-medication practice among pregnant women. Conclusion: The prevalence of self-medication practices among pregnant women is found to be high. Self-medication practices of the pregnant women were significantly higher among women who were in first-trimester pregnancy, encountered illness during pregnancy, previous self-medication history, and previous pregnancy-related problems.Prospero registration number: CRD42023394907.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0281260, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has a significant challenge for countries to maintain the provision of essential maternity services. Many women could experience difficulties in accessing maternal healthcare due to transport problems, anxiety, and fear of infection. A reduction in the utilization of maternity services has been suggested as a possible cause of worsened maternal health outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. METHODS: Searching of articles was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Inspection of the Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to evaluate the evidence of publication bias. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q statistic and quantified by I2. A random-effects model was used to determine pooled estimates using STATA 14. RESULTS: After reviewing 41,188 articles, 21 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled reduction was 26.62% (95% CI: 13.86, 39.37) for family planning, 19.30% (95% CI: 15.85, 22.76) for antenatal care, 12.82% (95% CI: 7.29, 18.34) for institutional delivery, 17.82% (95% CI: 8.32, 27.32) for postnatal care, and 19.39% (95% CI: 11.29, 27.49) for abortion care. This study also demonstrated that maternal perception of poor quality of care and fear of infection, lack of transport, cultural events, diversion of resources, lack of essential drugs, and lack of personal protective equipment and sanitizer were identified as the main challenges faced during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the utilization of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia significantly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Government measures, health facility-related barriers, and maternal-related factors were identified as challenges faced during the pandemic. Thus, service providers, policy-makers, and other relevant stakeholders should prioritize maternity care as an essential core healthcare service. Besides, increasing awareness of women through mass media, and making maternity services more accessible and equitable would likely increase the utilization of maternal healthcare services. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021293681.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maternal Health Services , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Pandemics , Ethiopia , Health Services Accessibility
3.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0279362, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36548273

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Traditional uvulectomy is widely practiced in Africa especially in sub-Saharan countries including Ethiopia. Studies conducted in different times and areas of the world have shown that the level of practice of uvulectomy and its associated factors were varied from country to country. Therefore, this study was carried out to assess the practice and associated factors of traditional uvulectomy among caregivers having children less than 5 years old in the South Gondar Zone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess practice and associated factors of traditional uvulectomy among caregivers having children less than 5 years old in South Gondar Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia, 2020. METHOD: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 634 participants who were selected using a multistage with a simple random sampling method. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered Amharic version questionnaire; it was entered into Epi Data and analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics were calculated and logistic regressions were fitted to declare statistical significance at p-value < 0.05 and 95% CI. RESULT: The prevalence of traditional uvulectomy in this study was 52.5% (95% CI, 48.6-56.3%). Moreover, lack of information [AOR = 2.975 (1.677-5.277)], perceived as uvula causes illness [AOR = 4.888 (2.954-8.086)], future intention or will perform [AOR = 4.188 (2.584-6.788)], perceived as traditional uvulectomy should not be eradicated [AOR = 1.893 (1.172-3.057)]), saw the previous good result [AOR = 9.396 (5.512-16.016)], health personnel hospitality problem [AOR = 5.922 (2.392-14.664)] and did not get cured by pharmacologic treatment [AOR = 3.918 (2.073, 7.405)] were significantly associated with traditional uvulectomy. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The prevalence of traditional uvulectomy was high. Lack of information, perceived as uvula causes illness, future intention to uvulectomy, perceived as traditional uvulectomy should not be eradicated, saw the previous good result, health personnel hospitality problem and did not get cured by pharmacologic treatment were the factors significantly associated with traditional uvula cutting. Therefore, special attention will be given to creating further awareness to the community at large and setting controlling mechanisms for the health care delivery system.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Uvula , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...