Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 21(4): 791-800, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393955

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the benefits of intensive statin therapy on reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with hyperlipidaemia and retinopathy in a primary prevention setting in Japan. In the intension-to-treat population, intensive therapy [targeting LDL cholesterol <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL)] was no more effective than standard therapy [LDL cholesterol ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L (≥100 to <120 mg/dL)]; however, after 3 years, the intergroup difference in LDL cholesterol was only 0.72 mmol/L (27.7 mg/dL), and targeted levels were achieved in <50% of patients. We hypothesized that the intergroup difference in CV events would have been statistically significant if more patients had been successfully treated to target. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory post hoc analysis focused on intergroup data from patients who achieved their target LDL cholesterol levels. The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of CV events. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incidence of the primary endpoint in patients who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels in each group. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 1909 patients (intensive: 703; standard: 1206) who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol at 36 months was 1.54 ± 0.30 mmol/L (59.7 ± 11.6 mg/dL) in the intensive group and 2.77 ± 0.46 mmol/L (107.1 ± 17.8 mg/dL) in the standard group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, the composite incidence of CV events or deaths associated with CV events was significantly lower in the intensive than the standard group (HR 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.82; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests that achieving LDL cholesterol target levels <1.81 mmol/L may more effectively reduce CV events than achieving target levels ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and diabetic retinopathy.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, LDL/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diabetic Retinopathy/metabolism , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/etiology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/complications , Hyperlipidemias/metabolism , Intention to Treat Analysis , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Planning , Primary Prevention , Proportional Hazards Models
2.
Diabetes Care ; 41(6): 1275-1284, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29626074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is associated with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, particularly in patients with dyslipidemia and diabetic complications. We investigated the incidence of CV events with intensive or standard lipid-lowering therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia, diabetic retinopathy, and no history of coronary artery disease (treat-to-target approach). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intensive statin therapy targeting LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL (n = 2,518) or standard statin therapy targeting LDL-C 100-120 mg/dL (n = 2,524). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 37 ± 13 months. LDL-C at 36 months was 76.5 ± 21.6 mg/dL in the intensive group and 104.1 ± 22.1 mg/dL in the standard group (P < 0.001). The primary end point events occurred in 129 intensive group patients and 153 standard group patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84 [95% CI 0.67-1.07]; P = 0.15). The relationship between the LDL-C difference in the two groups and the event reduction rate was consistent with primary prevention studies in patients with diabetes. Exploratory findings showed significantly fewer cerebral events in the intensive group (HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.31-0.88]; P = 0.01). Safety did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant decrease in CV events or CV-associated deaths with intensive therapy, possibly because our between-group difference of LDL-C was lower than expected (27.7 mg/dL at 36 months of treatment). The potential benefit of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL in a treat-to-target strategy in high-risk patients deserves further investigation.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Comorbidity , Diabetic Retinopathy/blood , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...