Impact of PEG-GCSF in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single Center Experience and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic brought many challenges in healthcare systems globally. Pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-GCSF) is recommended to reduce febrile neutropenia (FN), however there are a few reports that G-CSF might worsen COVID-19 disease, and its appropriate use during the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the association between PEG-GCSF use and COVID-19 infection and severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy at the Nagoya Tokushukai General Hospital between October 2020 and April 2023 were included. Patients with suspected COVID-19 symptoms during each chemotherapy cycle underwent COVID-19 antigen testing. To assess the potential impact of PEG-GCSF on COVID-19 severity, we collected data on patient background, chemotherapy regimens, PEG-GCSF use, COVID-19 antigen tests, and COVID-19 infection from their medical records. RESULTS: Thirty patients received chemotherapy. In total, 71 cycles were administered comprising adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC; 37 cycles), docetaxel (DTX; 26 cycles) and docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC; eight cycles). Among those patients, suspected COVID-19 symptoms were observed in only one of 62 cycles of the three regimens (1.6%) with PEG-GCSF compared to two of nine cycles (22.2%) without PEG-GCSF (p=0.0405). However, because none developed COVID-19 infection during chemotherapy, we could not assess COVID-19 severity and PEG-GCSF use. CONCLUSION: A potential role of PEG-GCSF in reducing suspected COVID-19 symptoms during chemotherapy, reducing the anxiety and need for hospital visits, thus improving patients' quality of life, is suggested. These insights could contribute to optimizing the care of breast cancer patients in situations like the current pandemic.

The Partial Iliopubic Tract Resection Technique for Incarcerated Femoral Hernia: A Case Series and a Literature Review.

Femoral hernias have a high incarceration rate, often necessitating urgent surgical intervention. In this report, we present a safe and reproducible laparoscopic technique for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel involvement, including repair. Between December 2022 and May 2023, three female patients with incarcerated femoral hernias underwent urgent laparoscopic surgery. All patients presented with abdominal pain and were diagnosed with small bowel incarceration using computed tomography. Under laparoscopy, we confirmed intestinal incarceration and performed a standard transabdominal preperitoneal approach to identify the hernia defects. The iliopubic tract on the abdominal side of the hernia defect was carefully dissected using an energy device to enlarge the hernia orifice. A spontaneous reduction of the incarcerated intestine was achieved. After confirming the absence of bowel perforation, mesh was placed to repair the hernia. Following peritoneal closure, the affected part of the intestine was extracorporeally resected and anastomosed. We performed this technique on three patients, all of whom were later discharged without complications. In conclusion, for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel obstruction, laparoscopic partial division of the iliopubic tract enables an easy, safe, and reproducible approach to incarceration release and subsequent hernia repair.

Simultaneous robot-assisted colorectal surgery for sigmoid colon cancer and portal vein embolization from the inferior mesenteric vein for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The treatment of multiple cancers requires multidisciplinary expertise. In this case, we experienced a multiple cancers case, sigmoid colon cancer and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that required preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). PVE is often approached by trans-hepatic percutaneous approach or via ileocecal vein (ICV) or veins of the small intestine. In this case, the patient was scheduled to undergo robot-assist surgery for sigmoid colon cancer, and it was planned that the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) would be cut. PVE from the IMV was performed with hope to reduce complications. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and sigmoid colon cancer. A radical cure for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was expected by left liver lobectomy. Because of concerns about postoperative liver failure, it was decided to perform PVE. PVE via IMV approach was performed simultaneously with robot-assisted surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. The patient was discharged without complications 12 days after surgery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: PVE is a very important technique for massive hepatic resection. Percutaneous trans-hepatic approach has the potential to damage vessels, bile duct, normal liver. Venous approaches, including via ICV, have the potential to damage vessels. In this case, we performed PVE from the IMV because we thought this approach would reduce the risk of complications. The patient successfully underwent PVE without complications. CONCLUSION: PVE via IMV was successfully performed without complications. In multiple cancers case, this approach would be better approach than any other PVE approach like this case.

[A Case of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Surgical Resection of Left 7th Rib Metastasis after Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

The patient was an 81-year-old man. After a liver posterior segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, a painful bulge was observed in the left anterior thoracic region during a routine outpatient visit. Elevated tumor markers and contrast- enhanced CT scan revealed a mass with contrast effect in the left 7th rib. Ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed hepatocellular carcinoma metastatic to the left 7th rib. There were no other obvious metastases, and the diagnosis of a single bone metastasis was made. The patient did not request chemotherapy and underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization 4 times. The patient did not show any improvement in tumor markers or shrinkage of the tumor, and his quality of life was deteriorated due to increased pain. The patient underwent left chest wall tumor resection and chest wall reconstruction. Postoperative tumor markers were normalized and pain improved markedly. We report a case of postoperative recurrence- free survival for 2 years.

Axillary Lymph Node Swelling After COVID-19 Booster Vaccination: Japanese Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: COVID-19 has been a global pandemic for more than 2 years, and vaccination against COVID-19 using an mRNA vaccine is widespread. The COVID-19 vaccination can cause specific side-effects, such as axillary lymph node swelling; therefore, breast oncologists should pay attention to such occurrences. Initially, only two COVID-19 vaccinations were planned; however, in some countries third or fourth vaccines have been administered. Here, we present a female case who developed axillary lymph node swelling after her third vaccination. We have also reviewed the literature regarding this side-effect after a third or fourth COVID-19 vaccination. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old woman who came to our clinic regarding a mammography abnormality in her left breast. She had no palpable mass, but a left breast mass was shown by mammography, and ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging indicated a hamartoma. At 2 months after her second COVID-19 vaccination when she underwent these tests, she had no axillary lymph node swelling. We planned a follow-up after 6 months. At her next visit, by chance, she underwent ultrasonography 14 days after she received a third COVID-19 vaccination, and a swollen axillary lymph node was observed. CONCLUSION: Axillary lymph node swelling can occur after a third COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, breast oncologists will have to consider this side-effect of COVID-19 vaccination when diagnosing breast tumors.

Timing and Duration of Axillary Lymph Node Swelling After COVID-19 Vaccination: Japanese Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: COVID-19 vaccination is now performed in most of the world to limit the spread of the disease. The first mRNA vaccine was approved in clinical settings and has specific side effects including axillary lymph node swelling, which can be misdiagnosed as breast cancer metastasis. The timing of axillary lymph node swelling and its duration are unclear. Here, we present a Japanese case and review of the existing literature. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 67-year-old woman with breast calcification. She had regular follow ups in our hospital for this calcification and received ultrasonography of the breast and axilla at every visit. She visited 6 months before having her COVID-19 vaccination, and 7 days and 6 months after the first COVID-19 vaccination. She had a swollen axillary lymph node 7 days after the first vaccination, which although it was improved, remained for 6 months. CONCLUSION: Axillary lymph node swelling occurred 7 days after vaccination and remained up to 6 months after it.

Axillary Lymph Node Swelling Mimicking Breast Cancer Metastasis After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Japanese Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: COVID-19 started to spread as a pandemic in December 2019 and COVID-19 vaccination has been initiated worldwide. The efficacy of vaccination has been scientifically proven, but it might cause axillary lymph node swelling. To diagnose patients with axillary lymph node swelling caused by COVID-19 vaccination, we herein reviewed existing literature on this symptom. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 70-year-old woman with a breast tumour. She had undergone cecum cancer surgery and regular computed tomography (CT). During breast tumour follow-up, she received scheduled CT that indicated severe axillary lymph node swelling mimicking breast cancer metastasis. We performed aspiration biopsy cytology of that lymph node, and determined this was not cancer metastasis but an effect of the COVID-19 vaccine. We confirmed this diagnosis at one month after computed tomography showed that the lymph node swelling had improved. CONCLUSION: Axillary lymph node swelling can occur after COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, it is important to consider the effect of the COVID-19 vaccination on axillary lymph node swelling when diagnosing breast tumours.

COVID-19 Screening of Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment: A Single Center Experience in Japan.

Background/Aim: Breast cancer treatment mainly involves interventional methods such as surgical resection and chemotherapy. How to best perform these treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic remains to be established. Patients and Methods: Patients with breast cancer who received SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening before cancer treatment from December 2020 to April 2021 were included. PCR screening was performed within 72 hours of the scheduled admission time and treatment. Results: A total of 19 tests in 15 patients were analysed. Fourteen cases displayed no symptoms, and five cases had some symptoms. COVID PCR tests were negative in all cases. Conclusion: COVID-19 screening can ensure that breast cancer patients do not miss scheduled treatments as a result of the pandemic. Diagnosis of patients with symptoms that are shared by COVID-19 infection, chemotherapy, and breast cancer recurrence must be performed carefully.