Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Med ; 8(3): 71-8, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2247623

ABSTRACT

A total of 160 patients of two hospitals received 192 DSA examinations with different contrast administrations, and techniques of performing DSA were analyzed, compared, and evaluated with reference to the literature. It was concluded that (1) the peripheral injection of contrast material for IVDSA via cannula is simpler than that via a short catheter, but the incidences of contrast extravasation in both cases are higher than with central injection. (2) Both the lower part of the superior vena cava and the right atrial cavity are safe sites for central injection. With central injection for IVDSA, the arterial iodine concentration is approximately double that of peripheral injection, and consistent high quality examinations of the intracranial vessels may be obtained. However, neither peripheral nor central injections can visualize the small vessels clearly. (3) IVDSA may be substituted for conventional angiography only in examinations of the aorta and its main branches. (4) IADSA is becoming a superior angiographic technique and its clinical application is increasing. In addition, means of avoiding contrast extravasation during IVDSA and the main points of selecting the optimal technique for DSA are described in this paper.


Subject(s)
Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Angiography , Angiography, Digital Subtraction/methods , Child , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Injections, Intra-Arterial , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...