Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Cells ; 31(3): 281-7, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21331777

ABSTRACT

The circadian clock in plants regulates many important physiological and biological processes, including leaf movement. We have used an imaging system to genetically screen Arabidopsis seedlings for altered leaf movement with the aim of identifying a circadian clock gene. A total of 285 genes were selected from publicly available microarrays that showed an expression pattern similar to those of the Arabidopsis core oscillator genes. We subsequently isolated 42 homozygous recessive mutants and analyzed their leaf movements. We also analyzed leaf movements of activation tagging mutants that showed altered flowering time. We found that agl6-1D plants, in which AGAMOUS-LIKE 6 (AGL6) was activated by the 35S enhancer, showed a shortened period of leaf movement as well as a high level of ZEITLUPE (ZTL) expression, reduced amplitude of LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) expression, and arrhythmic TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1)/CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) expression. A shortened period of leaf movement was also seen in 35S-AGL6-myc plants, although 35S-amiRAGL6 plants, transgenic plants overexpressing an artificial miRNA (amiR) targeting AGL6, showed unaltered leaf movement. The amplitude of CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEIN 2 (CAB2) expression, a circadian output gene, was also reduced in agl6-1D plants. Taken together, these results suggest that AGL6 plays a potential role in the regulation of the circadian clock by regulating ZTL mRNA level in Arabidopsis.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Arabidopsis/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Movement , Period Circadian Proteins/genetics , Phenotype , Plant Leaves/physiology , Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Circadian Clocks , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes/genetics , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Period Circadian Proteins/metabolism , Plant Leaves/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation
2.
Plant J ; 65(1): 62-76, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21175890

ABSTRACT

MADS-box genes encode a family of transcription factors that regulate diverse developmental programs in plants. The present work shows the regulation of flowering time by AGL6 through control of the transcription of both a subset of the FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) family genes and FT, two key regulators of flowering time. The agl6-1D mutant, in which AGL6 was activated by the 35S enhancer, showed an early flowering phenotype under both LD and SD conditions. Its early flowering was additively accelerated by CONSTANS (CO) overexpression. The agl6-1D mutation strongly suppressed the late flowering of fve-4 and fca-9 mutants. Endogenous AGL6 transcript accumulation was photoperiod-independent and the AGL6:GFP protein was preferentially localized in the nucleus. In agl6-1D plants, the expression of FLC, MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING (MAF) 4, and MAF5 was downregulated. Interestingly, late flowering of a functional FRIGIDA (FRI) FLC allele was dramatically suppressed by the agl6-1D mutation. AGL6 activation in the flc-3 background further enhanced FT expression, suggesting that AGL6 also regulates FT expression independently of FLC mRNA level. A near RNA-null ft-10 mutation completely suppressed early flowering of the agl6-1D plants, suggesting that FT is a major downstream output of AGL6. Transgenic plants overexpressing an artificial microRNA targeting AGL6 showed a late-flowering phenotype. In these plants, FT expression was downregulated, whereas FLC expression was upregulated. The present results suggest that AGL6 acts as a floral promoter with a dual role, the inhibition of the transcription of the FLC/MAF genes and the promotion of FT expression in Arabidopsis.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Flowers/metabolism , MADS Domain Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/physiology , Arabidopsis/ultrastructure , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Flowers/genetics , Flowers/physiology , Flowers/ultrastructure , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , MADS Domain Proteins/genetics , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 38(9): 3081-93, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20110261

ABSTRACT

Flowering is the primary trait affected by ambient temperature changes. Plant microRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs playing an important regulatory role in plant development. In this study, to elucidate the mechanism of flowering-time regulation by small RNAs, we identified six ambient temperature-responsive miRNAs (miR156, miR163, miR169, miR172, miR398 and miR399) in Arabidopsis via miRNA microarray and northern hybridization analyses. We also determined the expression profile of 120 unique miRNA loci in response to ambient temperature changes by miRNA northern hybridization analysis. The expression of the ambient temperature-responsive miRNAs and their target genes was largely anticorrelated at two different temperatures (16 and 23 degrees C). Interestingly, a lesion in short vegetative phase (SVP), a key regulator within the thermosensory pathway, caused alteration in the expression of miR172 and a subset of its target genes, providing a link between a thermosensory pathway gene and miR172. The miR172-overexpressing plants showed a temperature-independent early flowering phenotype, suggesting that modulation of miR172 expression leads to temperature insensitivity. Taken together, our results suggest a genetic framework for flowering-time regulation by ambient temperature-responsive miRNAs under non-stress temperature conditions.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis/genetics , Flowers/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Temperature , Arabidopsis/growth & development , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Flowers/growth & development , Flowers/metabolism , Gene Expression Profiling , MicroRNAs/genetics , Mutation
4.
Plant Cell Physiol ; 48(1): 169-78, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17164321

ABSTRACT

In order to understand the mechanisms underlying plant development, a necessary first step involves the elucidation of the functions of the genes, via the analysis of mutants that exhibit developmental defects. In this study, an activation tagging mutant library harboring 80,650 independent Arabidopsis transformants was generated in order to screen for developmental mutants. A total of 129 mutants manifesting dominant developmental abnormalities were isolated, and their T-DNA insertion loci were mapped. The activation of one or more genes adjacent to a T-DNA insertion locus was confirmed in eight dominant mutants. A gene adjacent to the right border was usually activated by the 35S enhancers. Interestingly, the transcriptional activation of multiple genes within a broad range was observed in one of the mutants, which raises the possibility that activation by the 35S enhancers was not limited strictly to a single gene. In order to gain a better understanding of sexual reproduction in higher plants, we isolated 22 mutants exhibiting defects in female gametophyte development, and determined their T-DNA insertion loci. We propose that this mutant population may prove useful in the further determination of the functions of genes that play important roles in plant development.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Plant/genetics , Mutation , Plants/genetics , Base Sequence , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Plant/chemistry , Flowers/genetics , Gene Amplification , Molecular Sequence Data , Plant Leaves/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction
5.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 348(3): 929-36, 2006 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16899218

ABSTRACT

MADS box genes are known to perform important functions in the development of various plant organs. Although the functions of many MADS box genes have previously been elucidated, the biological function of the type I MADS box genes remains poorly understood. In order to understand the function and regulation of the type I MADS box genes, we conducted molecular genetic analyses of AGL28, a member of the Malpha class of type I genes. AGL28 was expressed in vegetative tissues in a photoperiod-independent manner, but not within the reproductive apex. This indicates that AGL28 plays a role in the vegetative phase. Overexpression of AGL28 caused precocious flowering via the upregulation of the expression of FCA and LUMINIDEPENDENS (LD), both floral promoters within the autonomous pathway. However, the loss of AGL28 function did not result in any obvious flowering time phenotype, which suggests that AGL28 may perform a redundant function. Collectively, our data suggest that AGL28 is a positive regulator of known floral promoters within the autonomous pathway in Arabidopsis.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/biosynthesis , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Flowers/genetics , MADS Domain Proteins/biosynthesis , MADS Domain Proteins/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , Up-Regulation/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/physiology , Arabidopsis Proteins/classification , Arabidopsis Proteins/physiology , Base Sequence , Flowers/physiology , MADS Domain Proteins/classification , MADS Domain Proteins/physiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Plants, Genetically Modified , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Signal Transduction/physiology
6.
Plant Physiol ; 139(2): 770-8, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16183837

ABSTRACT

CONSTANS (CO) regulates flowering time by positively regulating expression of two floral integrators, FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1), in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). FT and SOC1 have been proposed to act in parallel pathways downstream of CO based on genetic analysis using weak ft alleles, since ft soc1 double mutants showed an additive effect in suppressing the early flowering of CO overexpressor plants. However, this genetic analysis was inconsistent with the sequential induction pattern of FT and SOC1 found in inducible CO overexpressor plants. Hence, to identify genetic interactions of CO, FT, and SOC1, we carried out genetic and expression analyses with a newly isolated T-DNA allele of FT, ft-10. We found that ft-10 almost completely suppressed the early flowering phenotype of CO overexpressor plants, whereas soc1-2 partially suppressed the phenotype, suggesting that FT is the major output of CO. Expression of SOC1 was altered in gain- or loss-of-function mutants of FT, whereas expression of FT remained unchanged in gain- or loss-of-function mutants of SOC1, suggesting that FT positively regulates SOC1 to promote flowering. In addition, inactivation of FT caused down-regulation of SOC1 even in plants overexpressing CO, indicating that FT is required for SOC1 induction by CO. Taken together, these data suggest that CO activates SOC1 through FT to promote flowering in Arabidopsis.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Arabidopsis/growth & development , Arabidopsis/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Genes, Plant , MADS Domain Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Flowers/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Models, Biological , Phenotype , Photoperiod , Plants, Genetically Modified
7.
Planta ; 221(4): 523-30, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15682278

ABSTRACT

Positive selection of transgenic plants is essential during plant transformation. Thus, strong promoters are often used in selectable marker genes to ensure successful selection. Many plant transformation vectors, including pPZP family vectors, use the 35S promoter as a regulatory sequence for their selectable marker genes. We found that the 35S promoter used in a selectable marker gene affected the expression pattern of a transgene, possibly leading to a misinterpretation of the result obtained from transgenic plants. It is likely that the 35S enhancer sequence in the 35S promoter is responsible for the interference, as in the activation tagging screen. This affected expression mostly disappeared in transgenic plants generated using vectors without the 35S sequences within their T-DNA region. Therefore, we suggest that caution should be used in selecting a plant transformation vector and in the interpretation of the results obtained from transgenic approaches using vectors carrying the 35S promoter sequences within their T-DNA regions.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Genetic Markers , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Plants, Genetically Modified , Transformation, Genetic , Transgenes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...