Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Regen Med ; 15(4): 1550-1560, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356480

ABSTRACT

In the South Korean health technology assessment system, prices of alternative medicines, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in pharmaco-economic evaluations and patient access improvement systems such as risk-sharing agreements are the most important factors concerning the reimbursement of regenerative medicine (RM). Research and development companies in RM should review the key features of these medicines throughout the product development cycle to increase the probability of successful reimbursement. In addition, the South Korean government should take steps to improve the system to reflect the unique characteristics and value of RM in the reimbursement and pricing policy, to revitalize research and development, and increase patient access.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Policy/economics , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Regenerative Medicine/economics , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Humans , Republic of Korea
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357397

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to identify orphan drug accessibility and impact on pharmaceutical budgets in South Korea by analyzing the status of orphan drug designation, approval, reimbursement, and pharmaceutical expenditure. We analyzed the dataset on orphan drugs designated, approved, and reimbursed from 2007 to 2019 based on long-term real-world data. The designated and approved orphan drugs were 165 and 156, respectively, and 88 out of 156 approved products were reimbursed. Total expenditure on orphan drugs increased annually to account for about 1.44% of total pharmaceutical expenditure in 2018. Orphan drug expenditure per patient increased on average by 8.7% per year. The average annual cost of orphan drugs was USD 27,000-USD 47,000, with the maximum value of USD 260,000-USD 560,000. As there are a number of orphan drugs that have not yet been reimbursable after approval, a reimbursement policy should be established that considers the characteristics of orphan drugs. Since the rapid increase in orphan drug expenditure can be a potential threat to the insurance budget, budget management should also be considered. In conclusion, it is necessary to take preemptive measures to manage the health insurance budget efficiently while improving patient accessibility to orphan drugs.


Subject(s)
Data Analysis , Health Services Accessibility , Orphan Drug Production , Rare Diseases , Budgets , Humans , Rare Diseases/drug therapy , Republic of Korea
3.
BioDrugs ; 33(4): 423-436, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201616

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the economic burden of treating cancer patients has been soaring in European countries, performing a budget impact analysis is becoming one of the requirements for payers' application dossiers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the budgetary impact of introducing the biosimilar trastuzumab (CT-P6) from the payer's perspective and to determine the number of additional patients who could be treated with resulting savings in 28 European countries. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to analyze the financial impact of switching from originator trastuzumab to biosimilar CT-P6 in the treatment of early and metastatic breast cancer and metastatic gastric cancer with a time horizon of 1-5 years. Budgetary savings and the number of patients potentially affected were measured based on epidemiological and sales volume data. The base-case analysis assumed that the price of CT-P6 is 70% of the originator price, the switching rate of originator to CT-P6 in the first year is 20%, and the annual growth in the switching rate for each subsequent year is 5%. RESULTS: For analyses using the base-case scenario following CT-P6 introduction, the total estimated budgetary savings over a 5-year period (depending on the scenario) ranged from €1.13 billion to €2.27 billion based on epidemiological data, or from €0.91 billion to €1.82 billion based on sales volume data. In the first year only, the projected budgetary savings ranged from €58 million to €136 million, and the number of additional patients who could be treated using the savings ranged from 3503 to 7078 by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The conducted budget impact analysis assessing a switch from originator trastuzumab to biosimilar CT-P6 in 28 European countries indicates that budget savings could be between €0.91 billion and €2.27 billion over the next 5 years. These savings could be used to help improve patient access to local biologics in their respective countries while simultaneously strengthening the overall public health landscape across the European Union.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/economics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Substitution/economics , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Trastuzumab/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Budgets/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Female , Humans , Models, Economic , Stomach Neoplasms/economics , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30669602

ABSTRACT

This study reviews and evaluates the national drug formulary system used to improve patient access to new drugs by making reimbursement decisions for new drugs as part of the South Korean national health insurance system. The national health insurance utilizes three methods for improving patient access to costly drugs: risk-sharing agreements, designation of essential drugs, and a waiver of cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients want reimbursement for new drugs to be processed quickly to improve their access to these drugs, whereas payers are careful about listing them given the associated financial burden and the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. However, pharmaceutical companies are advocating for drug prices above certain thresholds to maintain global pricing strategies, cover the costs of drug development, and fund future investments into research and development. The South Korean government is expected to develop policies that will improve patient access to drugs with unmet needs for broadening health insurance coverage. Simultaneously, the designing of post-listing management methods is warranted for effectively managing the financial resources of the national health insurance system.


Subject(s)
Drug Costs , Formularies as Topic , Health Services Accessibility , National Health Programs/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Republic of Korea
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...