Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(6): 865-876, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the effect of postoperative analgesics on oncological outcomes after cancer surgery. We investigated the impact of tramadol after breast cancer surgery on recurrence and mortality and explored the mechanism by which tramadol affects cultured breast cancer cells in vitro. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery between November 2005 and December 2010 at Severance Hospital in Korea were reviewed. Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors related to postoperative recurrence and mortality. We performed the sensitivity test with propensity score matching to adjust for selection bias. In addition, we investigated the effects of tramadol on human breast adenocarcinoma (Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 [MCF-7]) cells via assessment of cell viability, clonogenic assay, and cell cycle analysis in vitro. RESULTS: Of 2588 breast cancer patients, 36.4% had received tramadol. Those who received tramadol had a 0.71-fold decreased risk of recurrence and a 0.56-fold decrease in mortality. The MCF-7 cell viability assays showed that tramadol had an anti-proliferative effect by cell cycle arrest, suppressing colony formation, and regulation of oestrogen and progesterone receptors. Tramadol induced apoptosis of MCF-7 cells via extracellular signal-regulated kinases by decreasing of 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)2B receptor and transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: After breast cancer surgery, patients who received tramadol had a decreased risk of postoperative recurrence and mortality. The anti-tumour effect of tramadol appears to involve inhibition of proliferation, induction of apoptosis, and effects on 5-HT2B receptor and TRPV-1.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tramadol/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Apoptosis/drug effects , Breast/drug effects , Breast/surgery , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Female , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , MCF-7 Cells , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 36(9): 656-666, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31083000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Propofol is an anaesthetic that resembles α-tocopherol and it has been suggested that it protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury in liver transplantation. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) presents an opportunity to test this hypothesis in both donors and recipients. OBJECTIVES: We compared clinical outcomes after LDLT following anaesthesia with propofol and desflurane against desflurane alone. DESIGN: A randomised, parallel study. SETTING: Single-centre trial, study period June 2014 and May 2017. PATIENTS: Sixty-two pairs of adult donors and recipients who underwent LDLT. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to receive either desflurane balanced anaesthesia or propofol total intravenous anaesthesia combined with desflurane anaesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was peak liver transaminase levels during the first 7 days after surgery. Liver function was assessed at 10 different time-points (before surgery, 1 h after reperfusion, upon arrival in the ICU, and daily until postoperative day 7). Creatinine was measured to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury. TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6 and TGF-ß1 were assessed in 31 donors after induction, at hepatectomy and at the end of surgery and in 52 recipients after induction, and 1, 3 and 24 h after reperfusion. RESULTS: Peak liver transaminase levels were not significantly different between the two groups. Liver function tests and creatinine were also similar between groups at all time-points. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, including acute kidney injury. With the exception of higher TNF-α in donors of the Propofol group at hepatectomy (0.60 ±â€Š0.29 vs. 1.03 ±â€Š0.53, P = 0.01) cytokine results were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Despite the simultaneous administration of propofol infusion in both donors and recipients, no improvement in laboratory or surgical outcome was observed after LDLT compared with patients who received desflurane anaesthesia alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02504138 at clinicaltrials.gov.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/methods , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reperfusion Injury/epidemiology , Adult , Allografts/blood supply , Allografts/drug effects , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Desflurane/administration & dosage , Desflurane/adverse effects , Female , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Liver/blood supply , Liver/drug effects , Liver Function Tests , Liver Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Transplant Donor Site/blood supply , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...