Fate of small remnant pancreatic tail in splenic hilum after laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective study.

Purpose: When performing laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP), sometimes, anatomically challenging patients are encountered, where the pancreatic tail is deep in the splenic hilum. The purpose of this study was to discuss the experience with the surgical technique of leaving the deep pancreatic tail of the splenic hilum in these patients. Methods: Eleven patients who underwent LSPDP with remnant pancreatic tails between November 2019 and August 2021 at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea were included in the study. Their short-term postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The mean operative time was 168.6 ± 26.0 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 172.7 ± 95.8 mL, and the postoperative length of stay was 6.1 ± 1.0 days. All 11 lesions were in the body or tail of the pancreas and included 2 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 6 neuroendocrine tumors, 2 cystic neoplasms, and 1 patient with chronic pancreatitis. In 10 of the 11 patients, only the pancreatic tail was left inside the distal portion of the splenic hilum of the branching splenic vessel, and there was a collection of intraabdominal fluid, which was naturally resolved. One patient with a remnant pancreatic tail above the hilar vessels was readmitted due to a postoperative pancreatic fistula with fever and underwent internal drainage. Conclusion: In spleen preservation, leaving a small pancreatic tail inside the splenic hilum is feasible and more beneficial to the patient than performing splenectomy in anatomically challenging patients.

Pancreatic Metastasectomy for Secondary Malignancy of the Pancreas: A Single-institution Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Metastasis to the pancreas is rare, and the benefit of resection for secondary pancreatic cancer is poorly defined. Furthermore, there are no guidelines for pancreatic metastasectomy in such patients. The purpose of this study was to discuss our experience with the operative management of secondary pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 76 patients who underwent pancreatic metastasectomy for secondary pancreatic cancer between January 2000 and December 2020 at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. RESULTS: Among the study subjects, 44 underwent distal pancreatectomy, 21 pancreaticoduodenectomy, 5 total pancreatectomy, and 6 enucleation or wedge resection for metastasis. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were higher in the patients with RCC than in patients with other malignancies (p=0.004 and p=0.051, respectively). Statistically significant differences were not observed in OS and RFS between patients with right RCC (rRCC) or left RCC (lRCC; p=0.523 and p=0.586, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic metastasectomy may offer promising outcomes regarding curative intent in instances of secondary pancreatic metastasis, particularly in the context of RCC. However, regarding the side of primary RCC, no statistically significant differences were found in OS and RFS between rRCC and lRCC.

Upfront Surgery and Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Postoperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In cases where neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is administered, research on short-term postoperative outcomes appears to be insufficient. We compared short-term outcomes of upfront surgery (UpS) cases and NAT cases for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,228 cases that had elective pancreatectomy at Samsung Medical Center from 2010 to 2020. All cases were classified into resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) according to NCCN guidelines 2017. In each group, factors were compared between the UpS and NAT groups. RESULTS: Rate of vascular resection was higher in the NAT group in RPC, compared to that in the NAT group in LAPC. Short-term postoperative outcomes had no significant differences between the UpS and NAT groups in both RPC and LAPC. CONCLUSION: In the NAT group, there were no significant differences from UpS in terms of short-term postoperative outcomes. Conversion surgery following NAT is a favorable strategy.

Realistic Advantages of Early Surgical Drain Removal after Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

The latest guidelines from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society stated that early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is beneficial in decreasing complications including postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs). This study aimed to ascertain the actual benefits of early drain removal after PD. The data of 450 patients who underwent PD between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical outcomes were compared between patients whose drains were removed within 3 postoperative days (early removal group) and after 5 days (late removal group). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for clinically relevant POPFs (CR-POPFs). Among the patients with drain fluid amylase < 5000 IU on the first postoperative day, the early removal group had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than the late removal group (30.9% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001; 9.8 vs. 12.5 days, p = 0.030, respectively). The incidences of specific complications including CR-POPFs were comparable between the two groups. Risk factor analysis showed that early drain removal did not increase CR-POPFs (p = 0.163). Although early drain removal has not been identified as apparently beneficial, this study showed that it may contribute to an early return to normal life without increasing complications.

Appraisal of 5-year recurrence-free survival after surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is regarded as incurable, with a limited survival rate after curative resection. The aim of this study was to explore long-term survival and late recurrence of PDAC after surgery. METHODS: Medical data of 859 patients who underwent resection between 1995 and 2014 were retrospectively examined. The clinicopathological features of the 5-year recurrence-free survivors and the patients with recurrent disease after 5 years were investigated separately. RESULTS: Among the 768 patients who were finally included in this study, elevated CA 19-9, tumor size, poor differentiation, and positive lymph node metastasis were associated with recurrence. In 89 patients with 5-year RFS, age, tumor size, differentiation, and lymph node metastasis were statistically significant predictive factors. Among these patients, disease relapse occurred in 11 patients; age was the only difference compared to those who remained free of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Most prognosticators failed to predict the risk of recurrence in the 5 years following surgery for PDAC, and recurrence can occur even at time points up to 100 months. Therefore, cure of PDAC cannot be guaranteed by a 5-year recurrence-free interval, and further studies into the inherent nature of PDAC are needed to develop adequate surveillance systems which may lead to improvements in survival.