Dysphagia after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to determine the prevalence of swallowing impairment in adults after cardiac surgery and examine associated risk factors and health-related outcomes. METHODS: A prospective single-center study was conducted in postoperative adult cardiac surgery patients with no history of dysphagia. A standardized fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was performed within 72 hours of extubation. Blinded raters completed validated outcomes of swallowing safety and efficiency. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative health-related outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In 182 patients examined, imaging confirmed inefficient swallowing (residue) in 52% of patients and unsafe swallowing in 94% (65% penetrators, 29% aspirators). Silent aspiration was observed in 53% of aspirators, and 32% did not clear aspirate material. Independent risk factors for aspiration included New York Heart Association III and IV (OR, 2.9; CI, 1.2-7.0); reoperation (OR, 2.0; CI, 0.7-5.5); transesophageal echocardiogram images greater than 110 (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.3); intubation greater than 27 hours (OR, 2.1; CI, 0.8-5.3); and endotracheal tube size 8.0 or greater (OR, 3.1; CI, 1.1-8.6). Patients with 3 or 4 identified risk factors had a 16.4 (CI, 3.2-148.4) and 22.4 (CI, 3.7-244.7) increased odds of aspiration, respectively. Compared with nonaspirators, aspirators waited an additional 85 hours to resume oral intake, incurred $49,372 increased costs, and experienced a 43% longer hospital stay (P < .05). Aspiration was associated with pneumonia (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.5), reintubation (OR, 5.7; CI, 2.1-14.0), and death (OR, 2.8; CI, 1.2-9.0). CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal aspiration was prevalent, covert, and associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Aspiration Screening in Motor Neuron Disease: Preliminary Results From Utilization of the Yale Swallow Protocol.

Purpose Dysphagia is a common symptom experienced by patients with motor neuron disease (MND). The Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP) is a validated screening instrument for identifying patients at risk for aspiration. The purpose of this exploratory cross-sectional, multicenter study was to investigate how the YSP results in identifying aspiration risk in patients with MND in comparison with aspiration observed during a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). Method Participants referred for VFSS as part of clinical management were recruited from four specialized MND clinics. All participants were administered the YSP immediately prior to the VFSS by a speech-language pathologist, with results recorded as pass or fail. Aspiration on VFSS was determined using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (scores 6-8). A 2 × 2 contingency table was constructed to compare results of YSP with those on VFSS. Results Thirty-one patients with MND (13 males, 18 females; M age = 64 ± 12 years) referred for VFSS participated in this study. Of the 22 patients who failed the YSP, interrupted drinking was the most frequent reason (65%). Compared to the VFSS, the YSP yielded a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 33%, positive predictive value of 36%, and negative predictive value of 78%. Conclusions The YSP is a simple tool and easy to utilize and has a high sensitivity in identifying aspiration risk in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A future investigation with a larger sample size is needed to better investigate the utility of YSP as a screening tool for this population.

Diagnostic utility of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to detect pharyngeal dysphagia in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is the most commonly utilized instrument to index bulbar function in both clinical and research settings. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed impairments in swallowing safety (penetration or aspiration) and global pharyngeal swallowing function in individuals with ALS. METHODS: Two-hundred and one individuals with ALS completed the ALSFRS-R and the gold standard videofluoroscopic swallowing exam (VFSE). Validated outcomes including the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) were assessed in duplicate by independent and blinded raters. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess accuracy of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and swallowing item to detect radiographically confirmed unsafe swallowing (PAS > 3) and global pharyngeal dysphagia (DIGEST >1). RESULTS: Although below acceptable screening tool criterion, a score of ≤ 3 on the ALSFRS-R swallowing item optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 64%, AUC: 0.68) and penetration/aspiration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 60%, AUC: 0.72). Depending on score selection, sensitivity and specificity of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale ranged between 34-94%. A score of < 9 optimized classification accuracy to detect global pharyngeal dysphagia (sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 68%, AUC: 0.76) and unsafe swallowing (sensitivity:78%, specificity:62%, AUC: 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale or swallowing item did not demonstrate adequate diagnostic accuracy to detect radiographically confirmed swallowing impairment. These results suggest the need for alternate screens for dysphagia in ALS.