Fifteen-year survival analysis of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Early studies have found Oxidised Zirconium (OxZr-Nb) total knee arthroplasties to have a low incidence of failure in young, high demand patients. Theoretically this is because they are low friction and hard wearing. However, there are a paucity of studies reporting on the outcome of these implants beyond ten years. The purpose of our study was to present an in-depth 15-year survival analysis of a cemented OxZr-Nb knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively and survival analysis undertaken with multiple strict end-points. Complication rates and patient reported outcomes were measured post-operatively. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventeen knee arthroplasties were analysed. Forty-nine patients required a reoperation for various reasons. Aseptic tibial loosening was the most common cause of failure (32.7%), occurring, on average, 2.8 years after the primary procedure. There was only one oxidised zirconium femoral failure recorded. Cumulative survivorship for reoperation for any reason was 91.52% at 15-years. On average, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University) score improved by 21.2 points at one-year post-surgery, which is beyond the considered minimum clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: This study presents a 15-year survival analysis of a cemented oxidised zirconium knee arthroplasty showing good survivorship over a range of analyses.

Short-Term functional comparison of three total knee arthroplasties-Journey II, Genesis II and Profix.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare the outcomes of three knee arthroplasty design philosophies and surface tribology.• A zirconium-surfaced, bicruciate-stabilised implant designed to mimic kinematic movement and improve flexion and outcomes;• A cobalt-chrome surfaced, multi-radius design with built-in femoral external rotation to aid balancing and patella tracking through a deeper trochlea groove;• A zirconium-surfaced, single-radius implant designed on surface conformity, particularly within the patello-femoral joint. METHODS: 313 knee replacements - 103 Journey II, 103 Genesis II and 107 Profix - were statistically assessed at a minimum of 2 years using WOMAC, Oxford and SF-12 scores, and range of movement. RESULTS: There was no difference between the actual or unit change in WOMAC scores (p = 0.140 and p = 0.287), SF-12 physical (p = 0.088) or mental scores (p = 0.975) between the three implants; or between the actual or unit change in Oxford score (p = 0.912 and p = 0.874) for the Journey II or Genesis II. The Journey II produced more flexion and range of movement than the Genesis II (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018) and Profix (p < 0.001 and <0.001) with no difference between the latter two (p = 0.402 and 0.568); with no difference in extension between the three implants (p = 0.086). There was no difference between those with or without a resurfaced patella. CONCLUSION: The three design philosophies and surfaces yielded no difference in outcome scores at 2 years post-operatively. The Journey II demonstrated better post-operative flexion. Resurfacing the patella did not alter the outcome scores or flexion.