Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br Poult Sci ; 52(5): 558-63, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22029782

ABSTRACT

The impact of combined lower concentrations of organically-complexed versus inorganic copper, zinc and manganese on meat quality in chickens was investigated. A total of 200 male broiler chicks (Ross-308), 1-d-old and weighing approximately 40 g, were divided into 4 groups comprising three experimental groups and one control group, with each consisting of 50 chicks. All groups were also divided into 5 subgroups, with each containing 10 broiler chicks. All birds were given a starter diet from d 1 to d 21, and a grower diet from d 22 to d 49. The diets were formulated according to the NRC recommendations. The mineral contents of the control diet were supplied using a standard inorganic mineral premix (containing 8 mg Cu as CuSO4, 40 mg Zn as ZnSO4, and 60 mg Mn as MnO, per kg). For the experimental diets, a mineral premix was prepared using organically complexed forms of those minerals at 1/3 (L1), 2/3 (L2) and 3/3 (L3) proportions. After slaughtering and evisceration, the carcases were stored at 3 ± 0·5°C for 10-12 h, and then the breast fillets removed from the carcases, and stored in a deep-freezer (-86°C) until analysis (for 30 d). For analyses, the breast muscles were then thawed at 4-6°C for 24 h. 6. The concentration of organically complexed mineral in the diet had no statistically significant effect on pH values of breast fillets. Treatments significantly affected the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) values. Lightness (L* value) of the fillet from broilers fed the diet containing inorganic minerals was significantly lower than that for broilers fed on the diets containing organically complexed minerals. The redness (a* value) and Chroma (C* value) significantly decreased while Hues (H* value) were higher in the fillet from broilers fed organically complexed minerals compared with those fed inorganic minerals. The yellowness (b* value) was not changed by dietary treatment.


Subject(s)
Chickens/metabolism , Meat/standards , Minerals/metabolism , Animal Feed , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Copper/administration & dosage , Copper/metabolism , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Linear Models , Male , Manganese/administration & dosage , Manganese/metabolism , Minerals/administration & dosage , Random Allocation , Zinc/administration & dosage , Zinc/metabolism
2.
Poult Sci ; 83(1): 84-8, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14761088

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to investigate whether inclusions of humate and probiotic into diets of hens during the late laying period increases egg production and improves egg quality. Hisex Brown layers (n = 300), 54 wk of age, were fed a control diet, 0.1% humate, 0.2% humate, 0.1% probiotic, or 0.2% probiotic for 75 d. Active ingredients of humate and probiotic were polymeric polyhydroxy acids (humic, fulvic, ulmic, and humatomelanic acids) and bacterial cultures (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus spp.), respectively. Egg production and feed intake were measured daily, and egg weight was measured biweekly. Also, a sample of 12 eggs from each group was collected randomly to determine egg quality every 25 d. The data were analyzed as repeated measures with time as subplot. There were no effects of dietary treatments on feed intake and egg weight. Egg production for hens supplemented with humate and probiotic was not different but was greater than for control hens. Egg production increased linearly and mortality and feed conversion efficiency (weight of feed/weight of eggs) decreased linearly with increasing levels of supplemental humate and probiotic. There were no effects of treatments on egg quality. In conclusion, supplementation of humate and probiotic during the late laying period increased egg production, reduced mortality, and improved feed conversion efficiency but did not improve egg quality.


Subject(s)
Chickens/physiology , Eggs/standards , Humic Substances , Oviposition/drug effects , Probiotics , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Chelating Agents/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Eating/drug effects , Female , Random Allocation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...