ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of two bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) was shown to lead to survival benefit. However, operators are reluctant to use BITA with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) because of concerns of increased rates of sternal wound infection and lack of studies supporting survival benefit compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting. The aim of this study is to compare outcome BITA grafting versus of SITA and vein grafts in PVD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-one PVD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 372 patients who underwent SITA. RESULTS: SITA patients were older and more likely more likely to have comorbidities (female, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, renal insufficiency, cerebrovascular disease, and emergency operation). Operative mortality (5.1 vs. 4.5%, in the SITA and BITA, respectively, P=0.758), rate of sternal wound infection (5.1 vs. 3.9%, P=0.421), and strokes (4.8 vs. 7.4%, P=0.141) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have significantly better 10-year survival (52.6 vs. 45.9%, P=0.087) and after propensity score matching (302 well-matched pairs), BITA was not associated with improved survival (hazard ratio: 0.902; 95% confidence interval: 0.742-1.283; P=0.784) (Cox model). CONCLUSION: The routine use of BITA versus SITA in PVD patients does not improve long-term survival. Selective use of BITA in lower risk patients might unmask the benefits of BITA.
Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/methods , Mammary Arteries/transplantation , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/surgery , Risk Assessment , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/complications , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/mortality , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting with a composite T-graft enables right coronary artery (RCA) system revascularization with the distal end of the free right internal thoracic artery (RITA). This study compares this grafting technique to left-sided BITA grafting and RCA revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) and saphenous vein grafts (SVG). METHODS: From April 1996 to July 1999, 1000 consecutive patients underwent left-sided revascularization with BITA. In 231 patients RCA grafting was performed with free RITA, in 246 with RGEA, in 142 with SVG, and 381 did not receive any graft to the RCA (no-graft group). RESULTS: Female gender, old age (> 70), emergency, and congestive heart failure were less prevalent in the RGEA group, and prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was more prevalent in the no-graft group. Thirty-day mortality (3.6%, 4.9%, 2%, and 3.4% in the RITA, SVG, RGEA, and no-graft groups, respectively) and occurrence of perioperative complications (sternal infection, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and bleeding) were similar. Overall, however, the trend was toward a higher complication rate in the RITA group (10.3%, 4.9%, 5.6%, and 7.3% respectively, p = 0.06). Midterm follow-up (40 to 78 months) showed similar 6-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) (88%, 87%, 89.5%, and 85.5%, respectively) and similar return of angina (10.8%, 6.3%, 10.6%, and 9.5%, respectively) in the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early and midterm results in patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting are not affected by the conduit used for RCA grafting.
