Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Prosthodont Res ; 66(1): 167-175, 2022 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176847

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the short-term effects of thermoplastic resin removable partial dentures (TR-RPDs), referred to as non-metal clasp dentures, with those of metal-clasp-retained RPDs (MC-RPDs) on the periodontal health of abutment teeth. METHODS: A randomized cross-over trial was conducted in 28 partially dentate patients. Participants were randomized into two groups and received MC-RPDs followed by TR-RPDs, or vice versa, for 3 months. Periodontal clinical parameters, such as the plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, tooth mobility, and microbiological status of the abutment teeth, were evaluated at the delivery and 3 months after using each RPD. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients enrolled, 24 (mean age, 67.3 years) completed the trial, and 55 abutment teeth were evaluated. The periodontal condition of the abutment teeth did not deteriorate after 3 months of using both types of RPDs. There was no statistically significant difference in the plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, tooth mobility, and the red complex bacteria between TR- and MC-RPDs (p >0.05). The Periotest value for TR-RPDs was significantly lower than that for MC-RPDs (p <0.05). However, this difference was not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the influence of TR-RPDs on the periodontal health of abutment teeth was limited within 3 months of use.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Periodontal Diseases , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Abutments , Humans , Periodontal Index
2.
J Prosthodont Res ; 65(4): 495-501, 2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33692285

ABSTRACT

Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness of chewing tests after removable partial denture (RPD) treatment in this prospective cohort study.Methods Pre- and post-RPD treatment, objective masticatory function was evaluated in 248 patients via chewing tests involving peanuts, a gummy jelly, and a color-changeable gum. A statistical comparison was performed between the pre- and post-treatment scores, and the standardized response mean (SRM) was determined as the treatment effect size (ES).Results After RPD treatment, the median particle size in the sieving method using peanuts significantly decreased, and the glucose concentration in the gummy jelly method significantly increased (P < 0.001). The ESs of the sieving and gummy jelly methods were larger (|SRM| = 0.3-0.4) than that of the gum method (|SRM| = 0.1). In the subgroup analysis, the sieving and gummy jelly methods resulted in a broader effective range (|SRM| ≥ 0.3) than the gum method. In patients without pre-treatment dentures, the ES was medium in the sieving method (|SRM| = 0.6) and weak in the gummy jelly and gum methods (|SRM| = 0.3-0.4). The pre-treatment level of masticatory function was significantly correlated with ES (ρ = 0.93, P < 0.001).Conclusions These results suggest that the sieving and gummy jelly methods are more responsive than the gum method for RPD treatment and that the pre-treatment scores affect the responsiveness.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Food , Humans , Mastication , Particle Size , Prospective Studies
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 48(7): 809-816, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33738828

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The existing masticatory performance (MP) tests cannot comprehensively evaluate objective masticatory function. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness and determine the clinically minimum important difference (MID) and related factors of a newly developed MP scale to integrate food biting, comminution and mixing ability in patients with removable partial dentures (RPDs). METHODS: Masticatory performance tests using gummy jelly, peanuts and colour-changeable gum were performed before and 3 months after RPD treatment in 248 partially dentate patients. A 10-point ordinal subscale was created for each MP test based on the distributions of MP values, and the three subscales were integrated into a single scale (iMP scale). We analysed the correlations between MP values and iMP scores and determined the effect size for RPD treatments and the MID on the basis of patient perception of chewing ability. RESULTS: iMP scores exhibited moderate correlations with the three MP values (|ρ| = 0.73-0.79, p < .001) and with the change scores (|ρ| =0.61-0.64, p < .001). The mean iMP score significantly increased after RPD treatment (p < .001), and the effect size was 0.35. Of the 248 patients, 55 (22%) reported a slight improvement in chewing ability with a mean iMP score change of 2.1 points. Sex and the number of missing teeth were significantly associated with iMP scores (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The iMP scale comprehensively evaluated objective masticatory function, including food biting, comminution and mixing ability in RPD wearers, and an increase of two points on the iMP scale was considered to be the MID in RPD treatments.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Food , Humans , Mastication
4.
J Prosthodont Res ; 65(1): 52-55, 2021 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938866

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of thermoplastic resin removable partial dentures (TR-RPDs) with metal clasp-retained removable partial dentures (MC-RPDs), from the patients' perspective. METHODS: Patient-reported outcome measures (Oral health-related quality of life [OHRQoL], patient satisfaction, oral appearance) were assessed among 24 partially dentate subjects who completed a randomized crossover trial comparing TR-RPDs and MC-RPDs. The prosthetic treatment fee for patients was used as the direct cost. The cost of achieving a clinically minimum important difference (MID) in Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) summary score, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICE R) for each outcome measure were determined. RESULTS: OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and oral appearance was rated higher with TR-RPDs compared to MC-RPDs. The median cost of achieving a MID in OHRQoL with TR-RPDs ($698) was 6.5 times higher than that with MC-RPDs ($107). The ICER was $67 for the OHIP summary score, $195 for the satisfaction score, and $1,169 for the oral appearance rating. CONCLUSIONS: Although TR-RPDs provide better OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and oral appearance than MC-RPDs, the cost-effectiveness of TR-RPDs was inferior to MC-RPDs from the patients' perspective.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Oral Health , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Oral Rehabil ; 48(4): 449-457, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222268

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ability of an instrument to detect a clinically important change in patient-reported outcomes following prosthetic treatment is critical for its use in clinical practice and research settings. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the responsiveness of instruments in evaluating patient perception of chewing ability after removable partial denture (RPD) treatment in a prospective cohort. METHODS: A single 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), 20-item food intake questionnaire (FIQ) and 6-point chewing difficulty scale (CDS) were administered to 248 partially edentulous patients to evaluate chewing ability pre- and post-RPD treatment. We conducted a statistical comparison between the pre- and post-treatment scores and determined the effect size (r) of RPD treatment for the instruments. RESULTS: A significant improvement in chewing ability after RPD treatment was identified by VAS and CDS (P < .05), but not by FIQ (P = .16), which identified an improvement after controlling for sex, age, the number of missing teeth and presence/absence of existing removable dentures. The effect size was medium for VAS (r = .54), weak for CDS (r = .14-.17) and absent for FIQ (r = -.09). The increase in r was significantly associated with impaired chewing ability before treatment (ρ = -0.87, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the 100-mm VAS, followed by CDS, is the most responsive instrument to detect an improvement in chewing ability after RPD treatment. Pre-treatment impairment of chewing ability was associated with better responsiveness of the instruments.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Mouth, Edentulous , Humans , Mastication , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Oral Rehabil ; 47(7): 902-909, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important differences (MID) of the Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) are the benchmark to meaningfully interpret treatment outcomes. However, there is no available information regarding the factors impact the MID variations after removable partial denture (RPD) treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the pre-treatment OHRQoL impairment on the MID in the oral health impact profile (OHIP) after RPD treatment. METHODS: In this prospective study, OHIP and Self-reported Oral Health (SROH) questionnaires were administered to patients before and 3 months after RPD treatment. The MID in each OHIP version (OHIP-49, OHIP-20, OHIP-14 and OHIP-5) was the mean score of patients who showed a minimum SROH improvement. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of the pre-treatment OHIP summary score on the MID score. RESULTS: Among 248 participants who completed both evaluations, 85 (34%) patients had minimum SROH improvements after RPD treatment. Multiple regression analysis indicated that each 10-point increase in the pre-treatment summary OHIP score was associated with an increase in the MID score of three points for OHIP-49 and four points for OHIP-20, OHIP-14 and OHIP-5 (P < .05), after controlling for age, sex and the number of missing teeth. Therefore, the MID increased as the pre-treatment OHRQoL was impaired. CONCLUSIONS: The MID was accounted for by approximately one-third of the pre-treatment summary score, independent of the OHIP version, in the interpretation of the effects of RPD treatment on patients' OHRQoL.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Humans , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Oral Health , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
J Prosthodont Res ; 64(1): 20-25, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31196765

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This randomised cross-over trial aimed to comparatively investigate patient preference and satisfaction with thermoplastic resin removable partial dentures (TR-RPDs) and conventional metal clasp-retained removable partial dentures (MC-RPDs). METHODS: Twenty-eight partially dentate subjects were enrolled and randomised to receive MC-RPDs followed by TR-RPDs or vice versa (n=14, each group). The subjects were asked to score overall satisfaction and denture-related parameters 3 months after delivery of each denture. Additionally, they were asked to choose their preferred denture type at the end of the trial. RESULTS: Of the 28 subjects, 24 (86%; mean age, 67.3 years) completed the trial. The overall satisfaction scores and ratings for oral appearance with TR-RPDs were significantly higher than those with MC-RPDs (P<0.05). Moreover, 75% (18/24) and 83% (20/24) of the subjects reported greater overall satisfaction and better oral appearance with TR-RPDs than with MC-RPDs (P<0.001, both). Scores for mucosal pain and food impaction were significantly better with TR-RPDs than with MC-RPDs (P<0.05). Relative to MC-RPDs, TR-RPDs provided slightly better oral comfort and speech, although the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Scores for chewing ability, denture stability, and ease of denture cleaning were almost identical for both types of dentures. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TR-RPDs hold an advantage over MC-RPDs in terms of oral appearance and can offer greater satisfaction than MC-RPDs in partially dentate arches with at least an occluding pair in the posterior region. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000007310).


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Denture Retention , Humans , Mastication , Patient Satisfaction
8.
J Dent ; 92: 103246, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738967

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MID) of the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in removable partial dentures (RPDs) wearers, using the oral health impact profile (OHIP). METHODS: In this study, RPD patients were asked to complete the OHIP and self-reported oral health (SROH) questionnaires before the treatment and 3 months after the RPD treatment. The Wilcoxon signed ranked test compared the pre- and post-treatment status and the Spearman correlation analysis evaluated the relationship between the pre- and post- treatment change scores of the OHIP and SROH. The median OHIP change score in a subgroup that showed minimum SROH improvement was determined as the MID. RESULTS: Of the 277 participants, 248 (89.5 %) completed the pre-and post- treatment evaluations. SROH and OHIP scores showed significant improvements after RPD treatment (P < 0.05). The OHIP change scores showed significant moderate correlations with the SROH change scores (P < 0.05). The MIDs for the summary scores of OHIP-49, 20, 14, and 5 versions were 14, 7, 3, and 2 points, respectively. An additional 2-3 points were assigned to the four dimensions (oral function, orofacial pain, orofacial appearance, and psychological impact). CONCLUSIONS: An OHIP change of more than 14 points (OHIP-49), 7 points (OHIP-20), 3 points (OHIP-14), 2 points (OHIP-5) and 2-3 points (4 dimensions) was considered clinically meaningful in RPD treatments. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed MID scores could be used as a benchmark for clinical decision making, interpretation of RPD treatment effects on OHRQoL, and sample size calculations in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Humans , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Oral Health , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Clin Oral Investig ; 24(8): 2603-2609, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705308

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if oral dryness is associated with oral pain sensitivity in removable denture wearers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the mucosa at the midline between the central incisors in the maxilla and mandible was evaluated in 333 removable denture wearers (mean age 71.2 years, male 33.3%). The frequency of oral dryness and severity of anxiety were evaluated using self-reported questionnaires. Multilevel analyses considering the correlated data structure (jaws nested within individual) adjusted for age, sex, number of missing teeth, anxiety level, smoking status, and systemic diseases were performed to examine the association between PPT and oral dryness. Further subgroup analysis stratified by number of missing teeth was performed. RESULTS: Oral dryness was present in 122 (21.6%) of 566 jaws in 73 (21.9%) of the 333 subjects. The mean (standard deviation) of the log PPT was 2.00 (0.26) in the subjects who perceived oral dryness and 2.04 (0.22) in those who did not. Oral dryness was associated with a lower log PPT, but the relationship was not significant (coefficient - 0.017; 95% confidence interval - 0.071, 0.038). Subjects with oral dryness and edentulous oral mucosa had a significantly lower PPT (coefficient - 0.145; 95% confidence interval - 0.283, - 0.006) than their partially dentate counterparts. CONCLUSION: There was a significant association of oral dryness with increased pressure pain sensitivity in the oral mucosa only in jaws with complete dentures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The approach to oral dryness could contribute to reduction of oral pain sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Xerostomia , Aged , Denture, Complete , Denture, Partial , Female , Humans , Male , Mouth Mucosa , Pain Threshold
10.
J Oral Rehabil ; 46(12): 1095-1099, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improvement of masticatory function is critical in prosthetic treatment. Multiple factors are related to patients' perception of chewing ability in denture wearers. However, the associations between such factors and chewing ability have not yet been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between mucosal pain and subjective masticatory function in patients with partial removable dental prostheses (PRDPs). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 333 consecutive patients with PRDPs (mean age 71.2 years, male 33.3%) who were recruited from the prosthetic clinic of a dental hospital in Japan. Patients' perception of chewing ability was evaluated using a food intake questionnaire consisting of 20 items, and chewing difficulty was rated by patients using an 11-point numerical scale. Participants rated the pain intensity of the denture-supporting mucosa and oral dryness while chewing. In addition, the bilateral maximal biting force (MBF) was recorded. A structural equation model was used to identify the factors associated with chewing ability and chewing difficulty. RESULTS: The model indicated that mucosal pain, oral dryness, the number of occluding pairs, the denture type (interim/definitive PRDPs) and the MBF were significant independent predictors of chewing ability and chewing difficulty (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that mucosal pain is a risk factor for impairment of subjective masticatory function in patients with PRDPs. It is clinically important to consider the denture design and to select denture base materials with regard to the prevention of mucosal pain.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis , Denture, Partial, Removable , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Japan , Male , Mastication , Mucous Membrane , Pain
11.
BDJ Open ; 3: 17003, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29607076

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/AIMS: To describe the protocol of a prospective cohort study designed to answer the question: 'Is sleep bruxism a risk factor for (peri-)implant complications?'. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study is a single-centre, double-blind, prospective cohort study with a follow-up time of 2 years. Ninety-eight participants fulfilling inclusion criteria (planned treatment with implant-supported fixed suprastructure(s) and age 18 years or older) will be included. Sleep bruxism will be monitored at several time points as masticatory muscle activity during sleep by means of a portable single-channel electromyographic device. Our main outcomes are biological complications (i.e., related to peri-implant bleeding, probing depth, marginal bone height, quality of submucosal biofilm and loss of osseointegration) and technical complications (i.e., suprastructure, abutment, implant body or other). RESULTS: The study is currently ongoing, and data are being gathered. DISCUSSION: The results of this prospective cohort study will provide important information for clinicians treating bruxing patients with dental implants. Furthermore, it will contribute to the body of evidence related to the behaviour of dental implants and their complications under conditions of high mechanical loadings that result from sleep bruxism activity. CONCLUSION: The protocol of a prospective cohort study designed to investigate possible associations between sleep bruxism and (peri-) implant complications was presented.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...