Effect of thermal stress on Frank-Starling relations in humans.

The Frank-Starling 'law of the heart' is implicated in certain types of orthostatic intolerance in humans. Environmental conditions have the capacity to modulate orthostatic tolerance, where heat stress decreases and cooling increases orthostatic tolerance. The objective of this project was to test the hypothesis that heat stress augments and cooling attenuates orthostatic-induced decreases in stroke volume (SV) via altering the operating position on a Frank-Starling curve. Pulmonary artery catheters were placed in 11 subjects for measures of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and SV (thermodilution derived cardiac output/heart rate). Subjects experienced lower-body negative-pressure (LBNP) of 0, 15 and 30 mmHg during normothermia, skin-surface cooling (decrease in mean skin temperature of 4.3 +/- 0.4 degrees C (mean +/- s.e.m.) via perfusing 16 degrees C water through a tubed-lined suit), and whole-body heating (increase in blood temperature of 1.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C via perfusing 46 degrees C water through the suit). SV was 123 +/- 8, 121 +/- 10, 131 +/- 7 ml prior to LBNP, during normothermia, skin-surface cooling, and whole-body heating, respectfully (P = 0.20). LBNP of 30 mmHg induced greater decreases in SV during heating (-48.7 +/- 6.7 ml) compared to normothermia (-33.2 +/- 7.4 ml) and to cooling (-10.3 +/- 2.9 ml; all P < 0.05). Relating PCWP to SV indicated that cooling values were located on the flatter portion of a Frank-Starling curve because of attenuated decreases in SV per decrease in PCWP. In contrast, heating values were located on the steeper portion of a Frank-Starling curve because of augmented decreases in SV per decrease in PCWP. These data suggest that a Frank-Starling mechanism may contribute to improvements in orthostatic tolerance during cold stress and orthostatic intolerance during heat stress.

Effects of heat and cold stress on central vascular pressure relationships during orthostasis in humans.

Central venous pressure (CVP) provides information regarding right ventricular filling pressure, but is often assumed to reflect left ventricular filling pressure. It remains unknown whether this assumption is correct during thermal challenges when CVP is elevated during skin-surface cooling or reduced during whole-body heating. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that changes in CVP reflect those in left ventricular filling pressure, as expressed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) while subjects are normothermic, during skin-surface cooling, and during whole-body heating. In 11 subjects, skin-surface cooling was imposed by perfusing 16 degrees C water through a water-perfused suit worn by each subject, while heat stress was imposed by perfusing 47 degrees C water through the suit sufficient to increase internal temperature 0.95 +/- 0.07 degrees C (mean +/- s.e.m.). While normothermic, CVP was 6.3 +/- 0.2 mmHg and PCWP was 9.5 +/- 0.3 mmHg. These pressures increased during skin-surface cooling (7.8 +/- 0.2 and 11.1 +/- 0.3 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05) and decreased during whole-body heating (3.6 +/- 0.1 and 6.5 +/- 0.2 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05). The decrease in CVP with LBNP was correlated with the reduction in PCWP during normothermia (r = 0.93), skin-surface cooling (r = 0.91), and whole-body heating (r = 0.81; all P < 0.001). When these three thermal conditions were combined, the overall r value between CVP and PCWP was 0.92. These data suggest that in the assessed thermal conditions, CVP appropriately tracks left ventricular filling pressure as indexed by PCWP. The correlation between these values provides confidence for the use of CVP in studies assessing ventricular preload during thermal and combined thermal and orthostatic perturbations.

The plasma atrial natriuretic peptide response to arm and leg exercise in humans: effect of posture.

During arm exercise (A), mean arterial pressure (MAP) is higher than during leg exercise (L). We evaluated the effect of central blood volume on the MAP response to exercise by determining plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) during moderate upright and supine A, L and combined arm and leg exercise (A + L) in 11 male subjects. In the upright position, MAP was higher during A than at rest (102 +/- 6 versus 89 +/- 6 mmHg; mean +/- s.d.) and during L (95 +/- 7 mmHg; P < 0.05), but similar to that during A + L (100 +/- 6 mmHg). There was no significant change in plasma ANP during A, while plasma ANP was higher during L and A + L (42.7 +/- 12.2 and 43.3 +/- 17.1 pg ml(-1), respectively) than at rest (34.6 +/- 14.3 pg ml(-1), P < 0.001). In the supine position, MAP was also higher during A than at rest (100 +/- 7 versus 86 +/- 5 mmHg) and during L (92 +/- 5 mmHg; P < 0.01) but similar to that during A + L (102 +/- 6 mmHg). During supine A, plasma ANP was higher than at rest and during L but lower than during A + L (73.1 +/- 22.5 versus 47.2 +/- 15.9, 67.4 +/- 18.3 and 78.1 +/- 25.0 pg ml(-1), respectively; P < 0.05). Thus, upright A was the exercise mode that did not enhance plasma ANP, suggesting that central blood volume did not increase. The results suggest that the similar blood pressure response to A and to A + L may relate to the enhanced central blood volume following the addition of leg to arm exercise.

Arterial blood pressure and carotid baroreflex function during arm and combined arm and leg exercise in humans.

AIM: During arm cranking (A) blood pressure is higher than during combined arm and leg exercise (A + L), while the carotid baroreflex (CBR) is suggested to reset to control a higher blood pressure in direct relation to work intensity and the engaged muscle mass. METHOD: This study evaluated the function of the CBR by using neck pressure and neck suction during upright A, L and A + L in 12 subjects and, in order to evaluate a potential influence of the central blood volume on the CBR, also during supine A in five subjects. Exercise intensities for A and L were planned to elicit a heart rate response of c. 100 and 120 beats min(-1), respectively, in the upright position and both workloads were maintained during A + L and supine A. RESULTS: The CBR operating point, corresponding to the pre-stimulus blood pressure, was 88 +/- 6 mmHg (mean +/- SE) at rest. During upright A, L and A + L and supine A it increased to 109 +/- 9, 95 +/- 7, 103 +/- 7 and 104 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively, and it was thus higher during upright A than during A + L and supine A (P < 0.05). In addition, the CBR threshold and saturation pressures, corresponding to the minimum and maximum carotid sinus pressure, respectively, were higher during upright A than during supine A, A + L, L and at rest (P < 0.05) with no significant change in the maximal reflex gain. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that during combined arm and leg and exercise in the upright position the CBR resets to a lower blood pressure than during arm cranking likely because the central blood volume is enhanced by the muscle pump of the legs.

Standing up to the challenge of standing: a siphon does not support cerebral blood flow in humans.

Model studies have been advanced to suggest both that a siphon does and does not support cerebral blood flow in an upright position. If a siphon is established with the head raised, it would mean that internal jugular pressure reflects right atrium pressure minus the hydrostatic difference from the brain. This study measured spinal fluid pressure in the upright position, the pressure and the ultrasound-determined size of the internal jugular vein in the supine and sitting positions, and the internal jugular venous pressure during seated exercise. When the head was elevated approximately 25 cm above the level of the heart, internal jugular venous pressure decreased from 9.5 (SD 2.8) to 0.2 (SD 1.0) mmHg [n = 15; values are means (SD); P < 0.01]. Similarly, central venous pressure decreased from 6.2 (SD 1.8) to 0.6 (SD 2.6) mmHg (P < 0.05). No apparent lumen was detected in any of the 31 left or right internal veins imaged at 40 degrees head-up tilt, and submaximal (n = 7) and maximal exercise (n = 4) did not significantly affect internal jugular venous pressure. While seven subjects were sitting up, spinal fluid pressure at the lumbar level was 26 (SD 4) mmHg corresponding to 0.1 (SD 4.1) mmHg at the base of the brain. These results demonstrate that both for venous outflow from the brain and for spinal fluid, the prevailing pressure approaches zero at the base of the brain when humans are upright, which negates that a siphon supports cerebral blood flow.

Effect of fitness on arm vascular and metabolic responses to upper body exercise.

We investigated arm perfusion and metabolism during upper body exercise. Eight average, fit subjects and seven rowers, mean +/- SE maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) 157 +/- 7 and 223 +/- 14 ml O2. kg(-0.73).min(-1), respectively, performed incremental arm cranking to exhaustion. Arm blood flow (ABF) was measured with thermodilution and arm muscle mass was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. During maximal arm cranking, pulmonary VO2 was approximately 45% higher in the rowers compared with the untrained subjects and peak ABF was 6.44 +/- 0.40 and 4.55 +/- 0.26 l/min, respectively (P < 0.05). The arm muscle mass for the rowers and the untrained subjects was 3.5 +/- 0.4 and 3.3 +/- 0.1 kg, i.e., arm perfusion was 1.9 +/- 0.2 and 1.4 +/- 0.1 l blood.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively (P < 0.05). The arteriovenous O2 difference was 156 +/- 7 and 120 +/- 8 ml/l, respectively, and arm VO2 was 0.98 +/- 0.08 and 0.60 +/- 0.04 l/min corresponding with 281 +/- 22 and 181 +/- 12 ml/kg, while arm O(2) diffusional conductance was 49.9 +/- 4.3 and 18.6 +/- 3.2 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1), respectively (P < 0.05). Also, lactate release in the rowers was almost three times higher than in the untrained subjects (26.4 +/- 1.1 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/min, P < 0.05). The energy requirement of an approximately 50% larger arm work capacity after long-term arm endurance training is covered by an approximately 60% increase in aerobic metabolism and an almost tripling of the anaerobic capacity.

Rowing performance of female and male rowers.

This study evaluated the rowing performance of female and male rowers with regard to their body size. Body height, body mass, fat-free mass, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), and "2000-m" rowing ergometer performance were measured in 71 females (age range 18-24 years, height 153-173 cm, body mass 43-69 kg, fat-free mass 34-55 kg; VO2max 2.1-3.9 L min(-1); 2000-m time 437-556 s) and 120 males (age 18-24 years, height 164-193 cm, body mass 58-95 kg, fat-free mass 50-81 kg; VO2max 3.4-5.6 L min(-1); 2000-m time 378-484 s). Rowing performance was correlated to body height (r=-0.81, P<0.001), body mass (r=-0.85, P<0.001), fat-free mass (r=-0.91, P<0.001), and VO2max (r=-0.90, P<0.001). However, rowing time was slower in the females than in the males with a similar body height (by approximately 10%) and body mass (by approximately 9%), but the sex difference was smaller when the fat-free mass (by approximately 4%) and VO2max (by approximately 4%) were matched. This study suggests that individuals with large body size and aerobic capacity possess an advantage for a 2000-m row on an ergometer. However, among females and males the variation in body size and aerobic capacity cannot explain the entire sex difference in ergometer rowing performance.