ABSTRACT
Introduction: Few articles have investigated patient satisfaction with laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) alone, excluding other diseases, such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient satisfaction after double-door laminoplasty for CSM and determine the preoperative and postoperative factors that affect patient satisfaction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of laminoplasty for CSM. We measured sagittal imaging parameters (cervical lordosis [CL], C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], and T1 slope [T1S]), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting patient satisfaction. Results: Ninety patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, CL decreased significantly (p<0.01), whereas cSVA increased significantly (p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative T1S values (p=0.61). The JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.01). The median patient satisfaction was 85 (range, 12-100) at 1 year postoperatively and 80 (range, 25-100) at 3 months postoperatively. In the multiple regression analysis, lower-extremity sensory disorder in the JOA score at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.01) and VAS scores for neck pain preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) were determined as factors affecting patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Cervical laminoplasty is a useful and satisfactory surgical procedure to restore patient function. However, patients with severe preoperative and postoperative neck pain and those with severe postoperative sensory disorders of the lower extremities may be less satisfied with the procedure. It is important to keep these things in mind when treating patients.
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we recount the medical trajectories of two male patients, both fourteen years of age, who sustained re-fractures of their radius and ulna six months post their primary diaphyseal fractures. Owing to the limited capacity for growth of the forearm bones between the ages of ten to sixteen years, many queries are engendered concerning apt treatment strategies. The pressing questions are whether these should be conservative or surgical and the precise method to be employed in surgical interventions. This discourse endeavors to demarcate preferred therapeutic options and shed light on a series of standard clinical dilemmas physicians encounter, along with an exhaustive scrutiny of existing literature.
ABSTRACT
The incidence of dysphagia following cervical fusion, which involves the occipital bone, is well established. However, dysphagia occurring after cervical fusion not involving the occipital bone is exceedingly rare. We present a case report of a 54-year-old male who developed unexplained dysphagia subsequent to posterior fusion up to C1-3 for an axis fracture.
