Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(7): 785-789, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551523

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent health care-associated infection. We aimed to reduce SSI risk after joint arthroplasty and spine surgery by reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization burden with presurgery intranasal povidone-iodine (PVP-I) application in conjunction with skin antisepsis ("the intervention"). METHODS: Retrospective case-control study; postintervention cohort versus a historical cohort. Adults who underwent joint arthroplasty or spine surgery during February 2018 through October 2021 ("post-intervention cohort") included. In the analysis cases any patient who underwent surgery and developed SSI within 90 days postsurgery, controls had no SSI. Postintervention cohort data were compared with a similar retrospective 2016 to 2017 patient cohort that did not use intranasal PVP-I. RESULTS: The postintervention cohort comprised 688 consecutive patients aged 65y/o, 48.8% male, 28 cases, and 660 controls. Relatively more cases than controls had diabetes mellitus (P = .019). There was a 39.6% eradication rate of S aureus nasal colonization post intranasal PVP-I (P < .0001). SSI rate was higher in patients positive versus those negative for S aureus on a 24-hour postsurgery nasal culture (P < .0001). The deep SSI rate per 100 operations postintervention versus the historical cohort decreased for all surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Semiquantitative S aureus nasal colony reduction using intranasal PVP-I is effective for decreasing SSI rate in joint arthroplasty and spine surgery. In patients with presurgery S aureus nasal colonization additional intranasal PVP-I postsurgery application should be considered.


Subject(s)
Povidone-Iodine , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcus aureus , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Male , Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Nose/microbiology , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(8): 937-942, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303045

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multifaceted approach effectively influenced antibiotic use in an orthopedics department. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing the readmission rate and antibiotic use before and after an intervention. SETTING: A 1,000-bed, tertiary-care, university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to the orthopedics department between January 2015 and December 2018. METHODS: During the preintervention period (2015-2016), 1 general orthopedic department was in operation. In the postintervention period (2017-2018), 2 separate departments were created: one designated for elective "clean" surgeries and another that included a "complicated wound" unit. A multifaceted strategy including infection prevention measures and introducing antibiotic stewardship practices was implemented. Admission rates, hand hygiene practice compliance, surgical site infections, and antibiotic treatment before versus after the intervention were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of admissions and hospitalization days in the 2 periods did not change. Seven-day readmissions per annual quarter decreased significantly from the preintervention period (median, 7 days; interquartile range [IQR], 6-9) to the postintervention period (median, 4 days; IQR, 2-7; P = .038). Hand hygiene compliance increased and surgical site infections decreased in the postintervention period. Although total antibiotic use was not reduced, there was a significant change in the breakdown of the different antibiotic classes used before and after the intervention: increased use of narrow-spectrum ß-lactams (P < .001) and decreased use of ß-lactamase inhibitors (P < .001), third-generation cephalosporins (P = .044), and clindamycin (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Restructuring the orthopedics department facilitated better infection prevention measures accompanied by antibiotic stewardship implementation, resulting in a decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a significant reduction in readmission rates.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Hand Hygiene , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...