[Chinese multicenter randomized trial of customized chemotherapy based on BRCA1 (breast cancer susceptibility gene 1)-RAP80 (receptor-associated protein 80) mRNA expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients].

Objective: BRCA1 (breast cancer susceptibility gene 1) and RAP80 (receptor-associated protein 80) play key roles in predicting chemosensitivity of platinum and taxanes. A randomized trial was carried out to compare non-selected cisplatin-based chemotherapy with therapy customized according to BRCA1 and RAP80 expression. Methods: Advanced stage NSCLC patients whose tumor specimen was sufficient for molecular analysis were randomized (1∶3) to the control or experimental arm. Patients in the control arm received docetaxel/cisplatin; in the experimental arm, patients with low RAP80 expression received gemcitabine/cisplatin (Arm 1), those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and low/intermediate BRCA1expression received docetaxel/cisplatin (Arm 2), and those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and high BRCA1 expression received docetaxel alone (Arm 3). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 226 patients were screened and 124 were randomized in this trial. ORR in the four subgroups was 22.6%, 48.4%, 30.3% and 19.2%, respectively (P=0.08); PFS was 4.74, 5.59, 3.78 and 2.73 months, respectively (P=0.55); and OS was 10.82, 14.44, 10.86 and 10.86 months, respectively (P=0.84). The common adverse effects included neutropenia, nausea, anemia and fatigue. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference of ORR, PFS or OS is observed in the experimental arms compared with the control arm. Patients with low RAP80 mRNA levels have a trend of better survival and higher response rate to gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.

Once-weekly prophylactic treatment vs. on-demand treatment with nonacog alfa in patients with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available on optimal prophylaxis regimens of factor IX (FIX) replacements for patients with haemophilia B. AIM: This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog alfa compared with on-demand treatment in adolescent and adult patients. METHODS: Males aged 12-65 years with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2%) were eligible for enrolment. Patients received on-demand treatment for 26 weeks, followed by once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Secondary end points included response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions used to treat bleeding events, and the incidence of less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE). FIX:C was measured on day 1 and at weeks 26 and 78. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) ABR was lower during prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment [3.6 (±4.6) vs. 32.9 (±17.4) events, respectively; P < 0.0001]. The majority (88.4%) of bleeding events had excellent or good responses upon the first infusion; 82.1% of events responded to the first infusion. No incident of LETE occurred. No thrombotic events or FIX inhibitors were reported. Eight of 17 FIX:C approximately 1 week after dosing were >2 IU dL(-1) (min-max of 2.13-10.39 IU dL(-1) ). CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly prophylaxis of 100 IU kg(-1) was associated with lower ABR compared with on-demand treatment in adolescents and adults with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B. Once-weekly prophylaxis was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile as that reported during the on-demand treatment period. Residual FIX:C may be supportive of effectiveness.

The impact of haemarthropathy on the QoL of Korean severe haemophilia A patients: the critical level of haemarthropathy for the QoL.

The minimum goal of secondary prophylaxis may be to delay the progression of haemarthropathy below a critical level over which it has a great impact on the QoL of haemophilia patients. However, the critical level of haemarthropathy may be different across countries. For these reasons, the impact of haemarthropathy on the QoL in Korean haemophilia A patients was investigated. Depending on observed Pettersson scores of 27 severe haemophilia A patients, they were divided into three groups, P (Pettersson score) ≤ 10, P11~19 and P ≥ 20 groups. The QoL of each patient, assessed by the SF36, was compared between the groups. In addition, the changes in the QoL of the patients were observed according to the changes of Pettersson scores to find out the critical level of arthropathy. None of the scores of the SF36 scales were different between the P ≤ 10 and P11~19 groups. In contrast, the scores of PF and MH scales were significantly different between the P11~19 and P ≥ 20 groups. When changes in the scores of each scale in the SF36 were observed according to changes in Pettersson scores, the average P score of 13.0 ± 2.7 was thought to be the critical level of haemarthropathy because above that level, haemarthropathy and physical and mental health of the patients rapidly deteriorated. The progression of haemarthropathy to the critical level should be delayed as long as possible to prevent or to delay a rapid deterioration of the QoL of Korean patients with haemophilia.

Profiling of differentially expressed genes in haemophilia A with inhibitor.

Inhibitor development is the most significant complication in the therapy of haemophilia A (HA) patients. In spite of many studies, not much is known regarding the mechanism underlying inhibitor development. To understand the mechanism, we analysed profiles of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between inhibitor and non-inhibitor HA via a microarray technique. Twenty unrelated Korean HAs were studied: 11 were non-inhibitor and nine were HA with inhibitor (≥5 BU mL(-1)). Microarray analysis was conducted using a Human Ref-8 expression Beadchip system (Illumina) and the data were analysed using Beadstudio software. We identified 545 DEGs in inhibitor HA as compared with the non-inhibitor patients; 384 genes were up-regulated and 161 genes were down-regulated. Among them, 75 genes whose expressions were altered by at least two-fold (>+2 or <-2) were selected and classified via the PANTHER classification method. The expressions of signal transduction and immunity-related genes differed significantly in the two groups. For validation of the DEGs, semi-quantitative RT-PCR (semi-qRT-PCR) was conducted with the six selected DEGs. The results corresponded to the microarray data, with the exception of one gene. We also examined the expression of the genes associated with the antigen presentation process via real-time PCR. The average levels of IL10, CTLA4 and TNFα slightly reduced, whereas that of IFNγ increased in the inhibitor HA group. We are currently unable to explain whether this phenomenon is a function of the inhibitor-inducing factor or is an epiphenomenon of antibody production. Nevertheless, our results provide a possible explanation for inhibitor development.

Cost and effectiveness of treatments for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in haemophilia patients with inhibitors in Korea.

First-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea is currently activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) as second-line therapy or as a last resort. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost and effectiveness of aPCC vs. rFVIIa for treating mild-to-moderate bleeds in inhibitor patients from the Korean reimbursement authorities' perspective. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization data (number of doses, average dose, number of outpatient visits, inpatient stays, ambulance transport and concomitant medications) were collected from an observational study involving four Korean paediatric haemophilia centres. Cost-effectiveness was modelled using a decision analysis approach and sensitivity analyses undertaken. rFVIIa was a more effective haemostatic therapy (87.1% efficacy in bleed resolution) than aPCC (64.0%). rFVIIa effected more rapid haemostasis, resolving bleeding in a mean of 6.6 h vs. 25.2 h for aPCC. Fewer rFVIIa doses were required per bleed vs. aPCC (means 1.7 and 2.3). Mean total direct medical costs from bleed initiation to cessation were estimated at Korean Won (KRW)12 460 thousand (US$12 311) for rFVIIa given as first-line therapy and KRW18 304 thousand (US$18 085) for aPCC given as first-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa vs. aPCC given as first-line therapy. In Korea, use of rFVIIa as first-line therapy for treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients is both clinically effective and cost-effective compared with initial aPCC treatment. rFVIIa should be considered as the first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors in Korea.