[Discordance between spine and hip Bone Mineral Density measurement using DXA in osteoporosis diagnosis: prevalence and risk factors]. / Prévalence et facteurs de risque de discordance de la dentisté minérale osseuse au rachis lombaire et à la hanche dans diagnostic d'ostéporose.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic discordance for osteoporosis is the presence of different categories of T-scores in 2 skeletal sites of an individual patient, falling into 2 different diagnostic categories identified by the World Health Organization classification. AIM: To determinate the prevalence and risk factors for T-score discordance between spine and hip measurement sites. METHODS: Demographic data, anthropometric measurements, and risk factors for osteoporosis were derived from a database of 1780 patients referred to the outpatient osteoporosis testing center of the departement of Rheumatology between September 2006 and February 2010. Bone mineral density (BMD) was performed by Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on L1-L4 lumbar spine and total hips for all cases. Minor discordance was considered when the difference between 2 sites was no more than 1 World Health Organization diagnostic class. Major discordance was present when 1 site is osteoporotic and the other is normal. RESULTS: In 1780 participants (1606 women and 174 males; mean age, 59.5 ± 14.3 years), concordance of T-scores, minor discordance, and major discordance were seen in 49.4%, 45.7%, and 4.8% of the cases, respectively. In both minor and major discordance BMD was lower in lumbar spine than total hips. In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis only menopause was identified as risk factors against T-score discordance with p<0.001 and [OR=5.47; IC: 2.61- 12.79]. The others factors: age, gender, BMI, fracture history, corticotherapy, rheumatoid arthritis, tobacco and diabetes were not associated with the T-score discordance. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should expect that at least half of patients tested by DXA will demonstrate T-score discordance between spine and total hip measurement sites. T-score discordance can occur for a variety of reasons related to physiologic and pathologic patient factors as well as the performance or analysis of DXA itself.

[Survival prognosis factors in multiple myeloma]. / Les facteurs pronostiques de survie au cours du myélome multiple.

BACKGROUND: Outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) is very heterogeneous in survival and therapeutic response, constantly fatale despite her therapy progress. AIM: To determine the prognostic factors and survival in MM. METHODS: We carried out a transversal study of 100 patients in the rheumatology department of hospital Monastir between 1991 and 2010. In each case we determinate the survival delay and also the clinical, laboratory, radiological data at diagnosis and therapeutic response. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.4 years and sex ratio H/F=1.27. MM is IgG type in 57%, IgA in 28% and light chain in 11% of cases. The survival mean is 34 months and the survival median is 26 months. Univariate analysis showed five prognostic factors: age (p = 0.016), anaemia (p=0.033), ß2 microglobulin ( p < 0.0001) , CRP (p = 0.0001), albumin (p = 0.002), LDH (p=0.001), plasmocyte proliferation rate (p=0.003) and rapidly therapeutic response (p <0.001). ß2 microgrobulin-CRP classification and the international staging system (ISS) presented a high prognosis signification (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated two prognostic factors: ß2 microglobulin and CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that MM presented many prognostic factors, which easily realised in daly practice. These prognostic factors are essentially to evaluate prognosis and select patients for appropriate therapeutic indication. ß2 microgrobulin- CRP classification and the international staging system (ISS) are more predictive than Durie Salmon classification in MM survival.

[Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis]. / Qualité de vie au cours de la spondylarthrite ankylosante.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing Spondylarthritis (AS) involves by its frequency and its repercussion on the functional capacity an important handicap and deterioration of the patients quality of life. AIMS: To evaluate the handicap and the quality of life during the AS and to seek the predictive factors of the deterioration of this quality of life. METHODS: A prospective study relating to 50 patients recruited in the Department of Rheumatology of F. B. Hospital of Monastir during 6 months period (Mars to September 2008). The studied parameters were the quality of life evaluated by a specific sore (ASQOL) and a generic score (SF-12). Also the physical, social and economic felt handicap was evaluated using a qualitative scale. Predictive factors (clinical, biological and radiological) of the quality of life were carried out. RESULTS: Our patients are divided in 42 men and 8 women with an average age of 38.9 ± 10.7 years. The average duration of AS is of 11.9 ± 7.6 years. The average of ASQOL is of 11.9 ± 4 (extremes: 0- 17). The average of physical SF12 is of 29.8 ± 6 (21.7-53.2) and of mental SF-12 of 35.3 ± 6.6 (22.5-55.8). The physical, social and economic felt handicap was considered to be average or important in respectively 88%, 72% and 86% of the cases. The predictive factors of a high ASQOL (faded quality of life) are absence of occupation, high BASMI, a high number of painful articulations and high BASFI, BASDAI, BASG, BASRI and EVA total pain. The factors associated to the alteration of the quality of life according to SF-12'S are male sex, professional statute, high number of painful articulations and high BASDAI, BASFI and BASRI. CONCLUSION: Our study shows the important deterioration of the quality of life in AS patients. The existence of the predictive factors of quality of life primarily related to the functional capacity of the patients and to the disease activity implicates an early and adequate disease management in order to decrease this repercussion.