Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 34(2): 77-81, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31922438

ABSTRACT

Nebulized fentanyl is well established for analgesia but its use for dyspnea requires further investigation. The aim of our study was to determine the effectiveness of nebulized fentanyl in treating patients with dyspnea and to determine if there were harmful side effects described by patients or their providers. We used a convenience sample of patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2018 and performed a retrospective chart review. We found that 360 doses of nebulized fentanyl were given to 73 patients during that time period. Of the 73 patients evaluated, 32 patients (43.8%) were female and forty-one were male (56.1%). The median age was 67 and the median length of stay was 9 days. There were no documented findings of bronchospasm, hypotension, or allergic reaction in any of the medical records reviewed. Patients treated with nebulized fentanyl for dyspnea showed a mean decreased respiratory rate of 4.3 breaths/min and a mean increased oxygen saturation of 2.3%. Also, 71% of patients with documented responses experienced an improvement in their dyspnea. Our preliminary data suggest that nebulized fentanyl has limited side effects and may have a role in the treatment of dyspnea. Further research is necessary to determine its efficacy.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea/drug therapy , Fentanyl/therapeutic use , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
2.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 1(6): 463-474, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427049

ABSTRACT

Description The world is in the midst of a pandemic from COVID-19, a disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2. Despite broad mitigation efforts, new cases continue with 74 million cases and 1.6 million deaths worldwide. Regardless of previous research efforts, there is no commercially available vaccine for any coronavirus. Novel vaccine development has historically taken at least 10 years from discovery to availability with only a 6% market entry probability. With the global impact, there is an urgency to expedite a vaccine to protect the population. The U.S. government launched Operation Warp Speed with the goal to produce and deliver 300 million doses of safe and effective vaccines by January 2021. Efforts toward this goal have included coordinated government agency support, parallel clinical trial deployment, de-risking manufacturing earlier in the development process and real-time U.S. Food & Drug Administration evaluation of the safety and efficacy data. Safety is a priority and key analysis has not been eliminated during the compressed timeframe. The two frontrunner candidates show promising efficacy rates for preventing COVID-19 with Moderna reporting 94.1% efficacy and Pfizer reporting 95.0% efficacy. Despite the herculean efforts by scientists to develop an effective vaccine in such a short timeframe, several national surveys suggest that public confidence in these vaccines is low with less than 50% of the survey respondents willing to be vaccinated. According to experts, the U.S. needs the vaccine to be at least 70-80% effective and a 70-80% vaccination rate in order to return to normal. Significant education and promotion is planned in coordination with the Centers for Disease Control.

3.
J Virol ; 80(14): 6952-63, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16809301

ABSTRACT

Of 30 baculovirus genomes that have been sequenced to date, the only nonlepidopteran baculoviruses include the dipteran Culex nigripalpus nucleopolyhedrovirus and two hymenopteran nucleopolyhedroviruses that infect the sawflies Neodiprion lecontei (NeleNPV) and Neodiprion sertifer (NeseNPV). This study provides a complete sequence and genome analysis of the nucleopolyhedrovirus that infects the balsam fir sawfly Neodiprion abietis (Hymenoptera, Symphyta, Diprionidae). The N. abietis nucleopolyhedrovirus (NeabNPV) is 84,264 bp in size, with a G+C content of 33.5%, and contains 93 predicted open reading frames (ORFs). Eleven predicted ORFs are unique to this baculovirus, 10 ORFs have a putative sequence homologue in the NeleNPV genome but not the NeseNPV genome, and 1 ORF (neab53) has a putative sequence homologue in the NeseNPV genome but not the NeleNPV genome. Specific repeat sequences are coincident with major genome rearrangements that distinguish NeabNPV and NeleNPV. Genes associated with these repeat regions encode a common amino acid motif, suggesting that they are a family of repeated contiguous gene clusters. Lepidopteran baculoviruses, similarly, have a family of repeated genes called the bro gene family. However, there is no significant sequence similarity between the NeabNPV and bro genes. Homologues of early-expressed genes such as ie-1 and lef-3 were absent in NeabNPV, as they are in the previously sequenced hymenopteran baculoviruses. Analyses of ORF upstream sequences identified potential temporally distinct genes on the basis of putative promoter elements.


Subject(s)
Genes, Viral/genetics , Moths/virology , Multigene Family/genetics , Nucleopolyhedroviruses/genetics , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Amino Acid Motifs/genetics , Animals , Base Composition/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...