ABSTRACT
Beef genetics are used with increasing frequency on commercial dairies. Although use of beef genetics improves calf value, variability has been reported in beefâ ×â dairy calf phenotype for traits related to muscularity and carcass composition. The objective of this study was to characterize morphometric and compositional differences between beef, beefâ ×â dairy, and dairy-fed cattle. Tested treatment groups included Angus-sired straightbred beef steers and heifers (Aâ ×â B; nâ =â 45), Angusâ ×â Holstein crossbreds (Aâ ×â H; nâ =â 15), Angusâ ×â Jersey crossbreds (Aâ ×â J; nâ =â 16), and straightbred Holsteins (H, nâ =â 16). Cattle were started on trial at mean BW of 302â ±â 29.9 kg and then fed at 196â ±â 3.4 d. Morphometric measures were recorded every 28 d during the finishing period, ultrasound measures were recorded every 56 d, and morphometric carcass measures were recorded upon slaughter. Muscle biopsies were collected from the longissimus thoracis of a subset of steers (nâ =â 43) every 56 d. Strip loins were collected from carcasses (nâ =â 78) for further evaluation. Frame size measured as hip height, hip width, and body length was greatest for H cattle (Pâ <â 0.05), and Aâ ×â H cattle had greater hip height than Aâ ×â J cattle (Pâ <â 0.05). Relative to BW as a percentage of mature size, ribeye area of all cattle increased at a decreasing rate (negative quadratic term: Pâ <â 0.01), and all ultrasound measures of fat depots increased at an increasing rate (positive quadratic term: Pâ <â 0.01). Although no difference was observed in muscle fiber area across the finishing period from the longissimus thoracis (Pâ =â 0.80), H cattle had a more oxidative muscle phenotype than Aâ ×â B cattle (Pâ <â 0.05). Additionally, H cattle had the smallest area of longissimus lumborum in the posterior strip loin, greatest length-to-width ratio of longissimus lumborum in the posterior strip loin, and least round circumference relative to round length (Pâ <â 0.05). Beef genetics improved muscularity in portions of the carcass distal to the longissimus thoracis.
Divergent selection of beef and dairy breeds has caused differences in skeletal size and muscularity. When calves from dairy systems enter the beef supply chain, variability in mature size and carcass composition are introduced. The objective of this study was to characterize morphometric differences in cattle populations with different proportions of beef and dairy genetics. Body measurements confirmed differences in mature size of beef-type cattle, dairy-type cattle, and beefâ ×â dairy cattle; Holstein influence was associated with greater skeletal growth. With advancing maturity, the rate of muscle accretion decreased quadratically while the rate of fat accretion increased quadratically. Although muscularity across all cattle types was similar in the longissimus near the last rib, differences were observed in the posterior end of the strip loin, the forearm, and the round. Differences in mature size, muscularity, and steak dimensions were observed between beef-type cattle, dairy-type cattle, and beefâ ×â dairy cattle.
Subject(s)
Body Composition , Muscle, Skeletal , Cattle/genetics , Animals , Female , Body Composition/genetics , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Meat , Body Weight/genetics , Muscle Fibers, SkeletalABSTRACT
In the feedlot, there can be a decrease in dry matter intake (DMI) associated with reimplanting cattle that negatively affects growth performance. This study was conducted to determine the mechanisms causing a decrease in DMI after reimplanting and identify a strategy to mitigate the decrease. Crossbred steers (nâ =â 200; 10 pens/treatment; initial bodyweight [BW]â =â 386â ±â 4.9 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design experiment. Cattle were implanted with Revalor-IS on day 0. Treatments included a Revalor-200 implant on day 90 before feeding with the following management practices imposed: 1) steers were returned to their home pen immediately after reimplant (PCON); 2) steers were placed in pens and restricted from feed and water for 4 h (RES); 3) steers were walked an additional 805 m after reimplant and then returned home (LOC); 4) steers were restricted from feed and water for 4 h and walked an additional 805 m (RESâ +â LOC); 5) steers were given an oral bolus of Megasphaera elsdenii (Lactipro; MS Biotec, Wamego, KS) and were restricted from feed and water for 4 h, and then walked an additional 805 m (LACT). One hundred steers were given an ear tag to record minutes of activity (ESense Flex Tags, Allflex Livestock Intelligence, Madison, WI). As a percentage of BW, DMI was 5% greater (Pâ =â 0.01) from reimplant to end for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RESâ +â LOC treatments. Likewise, as a percentage of BW, DMI was 6.6% greater (Pâ =â 0.03) from reimplant to end and 4.0% greater (Pâ =â 0.05) overall for the PCON treatment vs. the LOC treatment. Overall, DMI as a percentage of BW was 3.3% greater (Pâ =â 0.02) for PCON vs. RES, LOC, and RESâ +â LOC treatments. There was an increase in G:F from reimplant to end (Pâ =â 0.05) for RESâ +â LOC vs. the LACT treatment. From these data, we conclude that restricting cattle from feed and water for 4 h after reimplanting did not alter subsequent DMI. Increasing locomotion had the greatest negative effect on DMI and growth performance. Management strategies to decrease locomotion associated with reimplanting would be beneficial to DMI and overall growth performance of finishing beef steers.