Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Schedule II Opioids: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopedic surgeons are the third highest prescribers of narcotics. Previous work demonstrated that surgeons prescribe three times the narcotics required, and most patients do not properly dispose of leftover medication following surgery. This has prompted the creation of multimodal pain regimens to reduce reliance on narcotics. It is unknown if these pathways can effectively eliminate opioids following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our purpose was to evaluate a multimodal regimen without schedule II narcotics following TKA, in a randomized, blinded fashion. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain scores between groups. METHODS: A total of 43 narcotic-naïve patients participated in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Postoperative protocols were identical between cohorts, except for the study medication. The narcotic group received an encapsulated 5 mg oxycodone, whereas the control group received an encapsulated placebo. Perioperative outcomes were compared with routine statistical analysis. RESULTS: Four patients withdrew early secondary to pain: three in the placebo group and one in the narcotic group (p=1.00). We found no difference in hospital length of stay (p=0.09) or pain scores at all time points between cohorts (all p>0.05). There was a higher proportion of patients using a narcotic in the opioid treatment arm at day 30 (40% vs. 21.4%, p=0.29) and day 60 (20% vs. 7.1%, p=0.32), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A multimodal regimen without schedule II narcotics demonstrates equivalent pain scores and may reduce the risk of long-term opioid dependence following TKA.

Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.

Background: Patient specific implants (PSI) represent a novel innovation aimed to improve patient satisfaction and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, longitudinal patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for PSI are not well described. We sought to primarily evaluate PROMs of patients undergoing TKA with either PSI or off-the-shelf (OTS) implants at mid-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively collected cohort of 43 primary, cruciate-retaining TKAs performed with PSI (n = 23) and OTS implants (n = 20) by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, range of motion (ROM) return, reoperations, and outcomes [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) T-score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and Knee Society Score-Function (KSS-F)] were compared. Mean follow-up was 5 years. Results: TKA performed with either PSI and OTS implants demonstrated no difference in obtaining ROM by 3 months (extension 3° short of full extension vs. 0°, p = 0.16) or flexion (114° vs. 115°, p = 0.99) and final ROM was identical [0° extension to 120° flexion (p = 1)]. Although not significant (p = 0.42), 5 (22%) PSI TKA and 2 (10%) OTS implant patients required manipulation under anesthesia. KSS-F and PROMIS T-scores were higher in the PSI versus OTS TKA patients, respectively (90 vs. 73, p = 0.002; 51.6 vs. 44.5, p = 0.01). However, after multivariable analysis, none of these continuous outcome measures were significantly different (p = 0.28 for KSS and p = 0.45 for PROMIS T-score) between the groups. Conclusion: In a series of TKAs performed with PSI, no difference existed in postoperative ROM, reoperations, or patient-reported outcomes compared to OTS implants at 5 years. Surgeons may utilize the equivocal midterm results during TKA preoperative patient discussion of implant technologies.

Maximizing outcomes in a Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open tibia fracture with segmental bone loss: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open fractures are severe injuries associated with multiple complications and threaten the viability of the limb. In addition, large segmental bone defects pose reconstructive challenges when treating open fractures and outcomes can be unpredictable. This case report highlights a good outcome in a patient with a type IIIB open tibia fracture with segmental bone loss that was successfully treated with a staged induced membrane technique and latissimus dorsi free flap. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old female sustained a Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open tibia fracture with segmental bone loss after a motor vehicle collision. While amputation seemed inevitable, her extremity was able to be salvaged using the staged induced membrane technique and free flap coverage. She made an exceptional recovery and at 24-month follow-up, her short form-12 scores and foot and ankle outcome scores were close to the average for a healthy adult. CONCLUSION: Our patient's outcome represents the benefits of a shared decision-making process with a multidisciplinary approach and highlights the benefit of limb salvage in a healthy patient.